Hillary as Sec of State
- Thread starter anatta
- Start date
Cfan nastiness, salaciousness, and anything gossipy is your area of contribution.
I defended Duggar when the accusation was of his behavior as a 13 year old- that defense was not dismissive, but an attempt to allow it as a past anomaly. When it was further revealed that he had continued sexual deviations- I acknowledged it. I, unlike you am a reasonable person.
You go in for assassination politics. You're nasty.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Start with police murdering unarmed people.
Are you on support of new regulations, guidelines, and federal oversight of rogue police officers and departments?
Are you in support of eliminating grand juries in police shootings?
Are you in support of citizen oversight of police departments?
Any politician who isn't should not expect black support.
Are you on support of new regulations, guidelines, and federal oversight of rogue police officers and departments?
Are you in support of eliminating grand juries in police shootings?
Are you in support of citizen oversight of police departments?
Any politician who isn't should not expect black support.
I mentioned Trumps quality parenting in a response to BAC and Cfan went on the attack-
Would you consider those things to be more important than a lot of the other issues?
Nice try but that's not what happened. The fact that you considered his molestations to be "an anomaly" says everything about you.
And let me remind you of all the lies you posted about Hillary, starting with the one about wearing diapers. Talk about character assassination.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Yes ma'am, I do. Those issues are at the very top of my list.
I wouldn't care if a nuclear bomb was sitting on top of the Statute of Liberty .. I need those issues addressed before it goes off.
Police oversight is reasonable. I'd also like media oversight and prosecution of individuals if they engage in sensationalizing events.
Ask J Craft. He brought it up in #102 as a defense of Trump.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Find a conservative politician that thinks like that, and we'd have a reasonable starting point for a conversation.
That should also include prosecution and jail for rogue police officers.
ok thank you. I have one good friend who is black but she isn't as sympathetic to those issues as you seem to be and so I was wondering how those issues ranked for you.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
I appreciate your questions. Your friend may have a different opinion, but the vast majority of black voters have the same opinion on those issues.
It's exactly what happened- your dishonesty is once again showing.
I posted that wikileaks said she wears diaper's. I believe she does- Wikileaks has not been wrong yet.
So, Hillary, who has benefited from DOJ interference is going to now ensure integrity with the DOJ?
Obama poiticized DoJ. That's ethical corruption. Lynch has to go.
Given Clinton's penchant for "pay for play"...and political appointees already there..don't look for any changes
If those issues got fixed then what would be the next set of issues that would be important for black voters?
I searched wikileaks and found NOTHING. Maybe you could search it and prove me wrong.
An image purportedly proving that the Democratic presidential candidate is incontinent was digitally manipulated.
Claim: An image serves as photographic proof that Hillary Clinton is incontinent.
Example: [Collected via e-mail, June 2016]
I keep seeing on FB a pic of Hillary Clinton getting on a plane with what appears to be a wet spot on her behind. It is labeled "Incontinent Hillary". Is it real, photoshoped? something else?
Origin:In May 2016, a distasteful meme purportedly showing Hillary Clinton with a wet spot on her backside started making the rounds on social media, along with speculation that the Democratic presidential candidate was possibly incontinent...
The above-displayed image has been photoshopped. The real image was taken by photographer Luke Frazza in 1996, and shows then-First Lady Hillary Clinton boarding Air Force One with then-President Bill Clinton:
US President Bill Clinton (L) and his wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton (R), board Air Force One on their way to the Atlanta Olympics after meeting with the relatives of the victims of TWA flight 800 25 July 1996 at a hotel near John F. Kennedy International Airport. The president later proposed increased security measures for air travel in the US.
Last updated: 07 June 2016
http://www.snopes.com/photograph-incontinent-hillary-clinton/
Last edited:
Excerpts from "Are the Clinton WikiLeaks emails doctored, or are they authentic?"
It’s possible to verify the legitimacy of some, but not all, of the emails, cybersecurity experts said. So we can’t definitively say none of the thousands of leaked emails, which came from campaign chair John Podesta's account, have been doctored...
"I've looked at a lot of document dumps provided by hacker groups over the years, and in almost every case you can find a few altered or entirely falsified documents," said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of cybersecurity firm Taia Global. "But only a few. The vast majority were genuine. I believe that's the case with the Podesta emails, as well."
Experts pointed to the Democratic National Committee email hack that happened earlier this year. Metadata from the stolen and leaked documents showed the hackers had edited documents. For example, hackers were kicked out of the DNC network June 11, yet among their documents is a file that was created on June 15, found Thomas Rid, a war studies professor at King’s College London.
A few weeks later, Guccifer 2.0, the hacker believed to have Russian ties, released documents supposedly stolen from the Clinton Foundation. But security analysts reviewed the documents and found that they actually came from the DNC hacks, not the foundation. And some of the information was likely fabricated, like a folder conspicuously titled "Pay to Play."
...digital signatures are embedded in the raw sources available on the WikiLeaks website and can be used to "concretely prove that many of the emails in the Wikileaks dump are undoctored," said cybersecurity consultant Matt Tait. However, some of the emails in the WikiLeaks dump — especially among emails sent to Podesta — don’t have these signatures and can’t be technically verified. And digital signature verification wouldn’t detect tampering by omission, like if the hackers were to withhold certain emails.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...inton-wikileaks-emails-doctored-or-are-they-/
It’s possible to verify the legitimacy of some, but not all, of the emails, cybersecurity experts said. So we can’t definitively say none of the thousands of leaked emails, which came from campaign chair John Podesta's account, have been doctored...
"I've looked at a lot of document dumps provided by hacker groups over the years, and in almost every case you can find a few altered or entirely falsified documents," said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of cybersecurity firm Taia Global. "But only a few. The vast majority were genuine. I believe that's the case with the Podesta emails, as well."
Experts pointed to the Democratic National Committee email hack that happened earlier this year. Metadata from the stolen and leaked documents showed the hackers had edited documents. For example, hackers were kicked out of the DNC network June 11, yet among their documents is a file that was created on June 15, found Thomas Rid, a war studies professor at King’s College London.
A few weeks later, Guccifer 2.0, the hacker believed to have Russian ties, released documents supposedly stolen from the Clinton Foundation. But security analysts reviewed the documents and found that they actually came from the DNC hacks, not the foundation. And some of the information was likely fabricated, like a folder conspicuously titled "Pay to Play."
...digital signatures are embedded in the raw sources available on the WikiLeaks website and can be used to "concretely prove that many of the emails in the Wikileaks dump are undoctored," said cybersecurity consultant Matt Tait. However, some of the emails in the WikiLeaks dump — especially among emails sent to Podesta — don’t have these signatures and can’t be technically verified. And digital signature verification wouldn’t detect tampering by omission, like if the hackers were to withhold certain emails.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...inton-wikileaks-emails-doctored-or-are-they-/