What's the problem with democrats and slavery?

cant handle the truth? Democrats supported slavery in the past. You claim your party "changed" and is still pushing illegals/ i mean slaves now.

You dumbfucks keep getting the label confused with the ideology. The Democrats of the KKK days were CONSERVATIVES. Republicans of today hardly resemble Reagan Republicans much less the Party of Lincoln.
 
cant handle the truth? Democrats supported slavery in the past. You claim your party "changed" and is still pushing illegals/ i mean slaves now.

You dumbfucks keep getting the label confused with the ideology. The Democrats of the KKK days were CONSERVATIVES. Republicans of today hardly resemble Reagan Republicans much less the Party of Lincoln.

Republicans today are the ones who want the cheapest labor possible, so don't piss in our legs and tell us it's raining.
 
You dumbfucks keep getting the label confused with the ideology. The Democrats of the KKK days were CONSERVATIVES. Republicans of today hardly resemble Reagan Republicans much less the Party of Lincoln.

Republicans today are the ones who want the cheapest labor possible, so don't piss in our legs and tell us it's raining.

i recall we ran our entire campaign on emancipating the slaves and sending them home. Numerous democrats said we couldnt do it because prices would rise.
 
i recall we ran our entire campaign on emancipating the slaves and sending them home. Numerous democrats said we couldnt do it because prices would rise.

11 million? Another one of Trump's lies.

Make no mistake, it's businessmen that want the dirt cheap labor. CONSERVATIVES almost to a person. From construction to farming.
 
You dumbfucks keep getting the label confused with the ideology. The Democrats of the KKK days were CONSERVATIVES. Republicans of today hardly resemble Reagan Republicans much less the Party of Lincoln.

Republicans today are the ones who want the cheapest labor possible, so don't piss in our legs and tell us it's raining.

Yup idiotic but equally dishonest.
 
Democrats are still pissed because the Republicans took away their slaves.....


they still can't get over that....
 
11 million? Another one of Trump's lies.

Make no mistake, it's businessmen that want the dirt cheap labor. CONSERVATIVES almost to a person. From construction to farming.

That GOP is dead. We killed it. In this election who was fighting to free the slaves and send them home and who was saying they had to remain slaves otherwise prices of foods and other stuff would go higher?
 
That GOP is dead. We killed it. In this election who was fighting to free the slaves and send them home and who was saying they had to remain slaves otherwise prices of foods and other stuff would go higher?

In my state, it's the CONSERVATIVE farmers, ranchers, dairymen, meat producers, construction industry that hire the illegals. Deal with that reality.

Fine and put those motherfuckers in jail for hiring the illegals. You'll see a major falloff in illegals.
 
In my state, it's the CONSERVATIVE farmers, ranchers, dairymen, meat producers, construction industry that hire the illegals. Deal with that reality.

Fine and put those motherfuckers in jail for hiring the illegals. You'll see a major falloff in illegals.

who campaigned to free the slaves and sent them home and who campaigned on keeping the slaves so that slave labor can be used to lower prices?
 
That's a Limbaugh revision of history, southern CONSERVATIVE Democrats fought for slavery, the same entity that just elected your man, did you really think Limcoln and his supporters were labeled the Radical Republicans because they were conservative?
Well you would be wrong friend.
Most Southerners were not slave owners anyway. Far and away the majority didnt own a slave.
They fought for States Rights and freedom from foreign (Washington DC) rule over their decisions and life's.
Limbaugh's a blowhard idiot. Turn him off. Listen to music.
 
Well you would be wrong friend.
Most Southerners were not slave owners anyway. Far and away the majority didnt own a slave.
They fought for States Rights and freedom from foreign (Washington DC) rule over their decisions and life's.
Limbaugh's a blowhard idiot. Turn him off. Listen to music.

1) There's no such thing as state's rights, nor was their fiction mentioned in the various secession documents. Slavery was, and often was the only issue cited.
2) Most Americans are not homeowners, but most plan to be. Cost was the only object in the way for most southerners, who nearly all wanted to own slaves
 
That's a Limbaugh revision of history, southern CONSERVATIVE Democrats fought for slavery, the same entity that just elected your man, did you really think Limcoln and his supporters were labeled the Radical Republicans because they were conservative?

Lincoln was not a Radical Republican. He would have spent much of his second term negotiating the matter of Reconstruction with them (probably in favor of his own vision rather than theirs).
 
Well you would be wrong friend.
Most Southerners were not slave owners anyway. Far and away the majority didnt own a slave.
They fought for States Rights and freedom from foreign (Washington DC) rule over their decisions and life's.
Limbaugh's a blowhard idiot. Turn him off. Listen to music.[/QUOTE

Yep... Since they had no skin in the game, smart politicians found something & convinced them that "states rights" was worth being killed for..:palm:
 
Well you would be wrong friend.
Most Southerners were not slave owners anyway. Far and away the majority didnt own a slave.
They fought for States Rights and freedom from foreign (Washington DC) rule over their decisions and life's.
Limbaugh's a blowhard idiot. Turn him off. Listen to music.[/QUOTE

Yep... Since they had no skin in the game, smart politicians found something & convinced them that "states rights" was worth being killed for..:palm:

No one fought for state's rights. The secession documents didn't mention them. The documents did mention slavery, the purity of the white race, etc. It's a giant fiction that southerners have invented. They certainly didn't respect northern "state's rights" when they supported Dred Scott and the Fugitive Slave Laws.
 
The bogus assertion:

"1) There's no such thing as state's rights" T #36

The fact of law:
B. O. R. ARTICLE #10: Ratified December 15, 1791
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
"1) There's no such thing as state's rights" T #36

piffle

Please tell the Easter Bunny I said hello.
 
Back
Top