Do I? Find where I said that.
Sookie is a lying cunt.
I put the piece of shit on ignore.
Do I? Find where I said that.
Sookie is a lying cunt.
I put the piece of shit on ignore.
cant handle the truth? Democrats supported slavery in the past. You claim your party "changed" and is still pushing illegals/ i mean slaves now.
cant handle the truth? Democrats supported slavery in the past. You claim your party "changed" and is still pushing illegals/ i mean slaves now.
You dumbfucks keep getting the label confused with the ideology. The Democrats of the KKK days were CONSERVATIVES. Republicans of today hardly resemble Reagan Republicans much less the Party of Lincoln.
Republicans today are the ones who want the cheapest labor possible, so don't piss in our legs and tell us it's raining.
i recall we ran our entire campaign on emancipating the slaves and sending them home. Numerous democrats said we couldnt do it because prices would rise.
You dumbfucks keep getting the label confused with the ideology. The Democrats of the KKK days were CONSERVATIVES. Republicans of today hardly resemble Reagan Republicans much less the Party of Lincoln.
Republicans today are the ones who want the cheapest labor possible, so don't piss in our legs and tell us it's raining.
11 million? Another one of Trump's lies.
Make no mistake, it's businessmen that want the dirt cheap labor. CONSERVATIVES almost to a person. From construction to farming.
Here's a clue, moron. The Republicans of today have ZERO resemblance to the Party of Lincoln.
Only according to car smashing retards like you
That GOP is dead. We killed it. In this election who was fighting to free the slaves and send them home and who was saying they had to remain slaves otherwise prices of foods and other stuff would go higher?
In my state, it's the CONSERVATIVE farmers, ranchers, dairymen, meat producers, construction industry that hire the illegals. Deal with that reality.
Fine and put those motherfuckers in jail for hiring the illegals. You'll see a major falloff in illegals.
Well you would be wrong friend.That's a Limbaugh revision of history, southern CONSERVATIVE Democrats fought for slavery, the same entity that just elected your man, did you really think Limcoln and his supporters were labeled the Radical Republicans because they were conservative?
Here's a clue, moron. The Republicans of today have ZERO resemblance to the Party of Lincoln.
Well you would be wrong friend.
Most Southerners were not slave owners anyway. Far and away the majority didnt own a slave.
They fought for States Rights and freedom from foreign (Washington DC) rule over their decisions and life's.
Limbaugh's a blowhard idiot. Turn him off. Listen to music.
That's a Limbaugh revision of history, southern CONSERVATIVE Democrats fought for slavery, the same entity that just elected your man, did you really think Limcoln and his supporters were labeled the Radical Republicans because they were conservative?
Well you would be wrong friend.
Most Southerners were not slave owners anyway. Far and away the majority didnt own a slave.
They fought for States Rights and freedom from foreign (Washington DC) rule over their decisions and life's.
Limbaugh's a blowhard idiot. Turn him off. Listen to music.[/QUOTE
Yep... Since they had no skin in the game, smart politicians found something & convinced them that "states rights" was worth being killed for..![]()
Well you would be wrong friend.
Most Southerners were not slave owners anyway. Far and away the majority didnt own a slave.
They fought for States Rights and freedom from foreign (Washington DC) rule over their decisions and life's.
Limbaugh's a blowhard idiot. Turn him off. Listen to music.[/QUOTE
Yep... Since they had no skin in the game, smart politicians found something & convinced them that "states rights" was worth being killed for..![]()
No one fought for state's rights. The secession documents didn't mention them. The documents did mention slavery, the purity of the white race, etc. It's a giant fiction that southerners have invented. They certainly didn't respect northern "state's rights" when they supported Dred Scott and the Fugitive Slave Laws.
"1) There's no such thing as state's rights" T #36B. O. R. ARTICLE #10: Ratified December 15, 1791
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.