Its simple produce the documents and source proving how the election was hacked and how that supposed hack "influenced" the election results. The New Times story has already been proven to be a fabricated "lie". 1. The RNC was never hacked 2. Those 17 agencies "never" reached a consensus. FYI: those sources you are touting as evidence were referenced the source as the NY TIMES article. Talk about circular LIES.
Time to put up or shut up.
Document the anonymous source....and present the evidence. He said, She said does not work in the real world.
And? Just what are we the people to do with this information? Attack Russia? Have a do over election? Impeach Trump before taking office? Or...the pragmatic reality reaction.....form another useless congressional investigation to get to the bottom of a subject where the CIA refuses to present the supposed information because they know they will be busted yet again for spreading "misinformation"?
None of this really matters in relation to the Election Process....as "Barry" the asshole in chief has just certified the election and stated very unambiguously that, "THE ELECTION itself was never physically violated....the votes are counted and Trump won."
Now again....show us how this information effected that vote. The revealed truth found to exist in the DNC's own communications somehow caused the people to be well informed? The People should not have access to the TRUTH? You want the election results dismissed because TRUTHFUL information was revealed prior to the actual voting process took place? Just how did those e-mail dumps effect the election? You don't think THE PEOPLE already knew about the DNC and its practices? Really? Nothing new was released....those e-mails "validate" the reason that the DEMOCRATS lost everything.
That reason? They will do anything to win....just like this thread proves, take FAKE NEWS and run with it like its real. Again its a simple request. Produce the anonymous GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS and the supposed evidential official reports....and explain just how this information caused the election results to be flawed...after the votes have been counted and recounted and the machines have been checked and rechecked.
Is transparency now a negative in a free election process?
Last edited:
