White House fails to make case that Russian hackers tampered with election

christiefan915 said:
Why should we believe Assange when he admitted outright he has a vendetta against Hillary?
Click to expand...
Assange has WIKI's entire credibility at stake too . I find it hard to believe he'd throw all that away just for a vendetta.
I mean anything's possible -but Wiki doesn't make stuff up/alter - or work with state actors.
The "Russian hackers" are all NGO's as far as I know of -but it would be out of character.

PS congrats on the Steelers win!. Thankfully the game was only pay per view here *ouch*
 
anatta said:
Assange has WIKI's entire credibility at stake too . I find it hard to believe he'd throw all that away just for a vendetta.
I mean anything's possible -but Wiki doesn't make stuff up/alter - or work with state actors.
The "Russian hackers" are all NGO's as far as I know of -but it would be out of character.

PS congrats on the Steelers win!. Thankfully the game was only pay per view here *ouch*
Click to expand...

Thanks, I appreciate the congratulations. Tomorrow we face the Browns but I'm still not taking anything for granted. :)

As for Assange, I can only go by what he himself says. Here's a link from Newsmax. I rarely post from RW sites. I saw this on other sites also.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/wikileaks-clinton-election-2016-politics/2016/10/23/id/754926/
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Obama has a well developed sense of self-importance lol.
Click to expand...
I think it wasyou who mentioned something about "how does Obama know what to sanction before Congress holds hearings."

Man did you nail that one! read the OP link:it's worth your time
In fairness, the reticence in both cases is likely justified by the interest in protecting sources and methods used to detect such attacks. And as Lee was quick to note, strong technical evidence is likely to be included in reports to Congress that later may be declassified. Still, it's hard to escape the conclusion that Thursday's Joint Analysis Report provides almost no new evidence to support the Obama Administration's claims Russia attempted to interfere with the US electoral process. Absent something more, the increasingly bitter debate may rage on indefinitely.
Click to expand...
 
christiefan915 said:
Thanks, I appreciate the congratulations. Tomorrow we face the Browns but I'm still not taking anything for granted. :)

As for Assange, I can only go by what he himself says. Here's a link from Newsmax. I rarely post from RW sites. I saw this on other sites also.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/wikileaks-clinton-election-2016-politics/2016/10/23/id/754926/
Click to expand...
thanks -very informative -from your link:
"But if an anonymous or pseudonymous group comes offering anti-Clinton leaks, they’d have found a host happy not to ask too many awkward questions: he's set up almost perfectly to post them, and push for them to have the biggest impact they can."
Click to expand...
all this Spook stuff..who knows..
 
christiefan915 said:
Thanks, I appreciate the congratulations. Tomorrow we face the Browns but I'm still not taking anything for granted. :)

As for Assange, I can only go by what he himself says. Here's a link from Newsmax. I rarely post from RW sites. I saw this on other sites also.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/wikileaks-clinton-election-2016-politics/2016/10/23/id/754926/
Click to expand...
The best credibility is Hillary's silence regarding their veracity. That and the DNC firing Wasserman, then Brazile. Plus Podesta never claimed hoax. They were their emails, alright.

The Dems need a different strategy. Maybe a recount.
 
GazzaQueen said:
The best credibility is Hillary's silence regarding their veracity. That and the DNC firing Wasserman, then Brazile. Plus Podesta never claimed hoax. They were their emails, alright.

The Dems need a different strategy. Maybe a recount.
Click to expand...

Just think about that lol: democrats are mad because they got caught cheating.
 
tsuke said:
only russia has the resources... how much resources do you actually need to send a phsing email?
Click to expand...

Hardly the truth. The 'NSA' has the means, the method, and the desire to ham string Clinton over her pompous use of classified communications that has resulted in the deaths of several deep cover operatives in the middle east. What's to stop some inside person from the NSA contacting Wikileaks and passing on the e-mails from the DNC? What? The NSA does not have the technology to recover these personal communications? Really? And what were they actually revealing? Nothing but the truth....as no one can deny the fact of these e-mails originating from any other place except within the DNC and Clinton's campaign.

The Russian deflection was just that....a deflection. Who better to blame ? :) That the very reason no one will ever seen any actual, objective evidence tying Russia directly to the careless, poorly secured DNC cyber system....none exists.
 
Nomad said:
Imagine that.

Right-wingers disavowing claims made by Obama while giving more cred to some online magazine article than to US intelligence sources.

Go figure. :palm:
Click to expand...
Why don't you show how the article is wrong. Cite facts from the report that proves it was Russia.
 
anatta said:
Assange has vehemently denied there were "Russian hackers" hitting the DNC. Lone wolves would explain much.

WTF was Obama doing by hitting sanctions on Russia on such nebulous crap?
Click to expand...

actually what Assange says is that there could have been hackers for all he knows but as far as wikileaks is concerned their source was a leak.
 
Mr. Meeseeks said:
exactly lol. a fucking 13 year old could phish podesta. the fact that people claim you need some state actor with super computers and the most sophisticated minds in russia to do this is patently laughable.
Click to expand...
The twat had his iPhone and iPad wiped within minutes of receiving an email from his assistant telling him that his Apple ID runner4567. That tells me that he is a stupid sod who deserved to get hacked!

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Mr. Meeseeks said:
your guy's bullshit propaganda is already falling apart.
Click to expand...

...and your head is so far up your ass you can't see daylight. The only propaganda we see is the shit your orange boy lies about day in and day out. Your fucking blue head must not be getting any oxygen up there.
 
anatta said:
Assange has vehemently denied there were "Russian hackers" hitting the DNC. Lone wolves would explain much.

WTF was Obama doing by hitting sanctions on Russia on such nebulous crap?
Click to expand...

Amazing how you can fit Assange's wang in your mouth while kissing Putin's ass at the same time.

You definitely have some mad skillz there.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Don't waste your energy, it's going to blow over soon lol.
Click to expand...
"Putkin is a KGB murderous thug!"
*drain the bottle*
Russian-Standard-Vodka2-lg.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top