This explains some things

Darth Omar said:
This has nothing to do with the Russian theory or the Russian investigation.

Trump and/or his staff would be the victims so it makes sense that Nunes would go to Trump first. In any event, it's an attempt to distract from *the fact* a felony was committed within the IC---against Trump and his campaign.

And if the actual source [not the whistle blower] is from the Daily Intelligence Briefings, Obama, Brennen, Comey and Rogers are all implicated.

When people say this could be bigger than Watergate they aren't being hyperbolic.
Click to expand...
This is MUCH bigger than Watergate, but not for the reasons you cite.
 
Darth Omar said:
Distraction.

It doesn't matter where it was viewed or where Nunes went with it first. It's a fact, that people were unmasked when they shouldn't have been and that, illegal intelligence, then apparently found its way into the Daily Intelligence Briefing.

By whose order?
Click to expand...
Yes...you are attempting to distract. Someone in the White House staff had to bring Nunes into the SCIF. Who would have done that? Does the right hand not know what the left hand is doing in the trump White House?
 
Althea said:
Yes...you are attempting to distract. Someone in the White House staff had to bring Nunes into the SCIF. Who would have done that? Does the right hand not know what the left hand is doing in the trump White House?
Click to expand...

Who cares who let him in the door lol.

It doesn't mitigate the fact people were illegally unmasked and their names then appeared in the intelligence briefings. In all the months of Russian obsession we only know of one actual crime.

And it had nothing to do with Russians: It was committed against people in Trumps campaign---and perhaps even against Trump himself.

Your apathy is noted.
 
Darth Omar said:
Who cares who let him in the door lol.

It doesn't mitigate the fact people were illegally unmasked and their names then appeared in the intelligence briefings. In all the months of Russian obsession we only know of one actual crime.

And it had nothing to do with Russians: It was committed against people in Trumps campaign---and perhaps even against Trump himself.

Your apathy is noted.
Click to expand...
You don't understand the problem with the White House being complicit in this cover up, yet you cite Watergate? Nunes said that he saw no evidence of any laws being broken with respect to unmasking.

Why is trump afraid of what Yates/Clapper/Brennan were about to say in that canceled hearing?
 
Darth Omar said:
Do you have actual evidence or is this going to be like the Russian bunny hole?
Click to expand...
Do you support the attempts to collect as much information as possible, or do you support Nunes canceling the hearing that would have testimony from Yates/Brennan/Clapper?


You do realize that lying to the FBI is criminal....yes?
 
Althea said:
You don't understand the problem with the White House being complicit in this cover up, yet you cite Watergate? Nunes said that he saw no evidence of any laws being broken with respect to unmasking.

Why is trump afraid of what Yates/Clapper/Brennan were about to say in that canceled hearing?
Click to expand...

How do you know he is?
 
Althea said:
Because he instructed Nunes to cancel the hearing. He canceled all hearings for this week. Good thing the Senate is still working on this.
Click to expand...

It's your partisan assumption.

They should bring Comey, Brennen and Rodgers before a closed hearing so they can't hide behind the 'can't answer, it's classified' mantra.
 
Darth Omar said:
It appears, most likely, someone (aka mysterious tipster), simply told Nunes which dates to review. Hence the Executive Branch SCIF was utilized. The ACTUAL intelligence product itself was the Executive Office Presidential Daily Intelligence Briefing.

Most likely a Clapper (ODNI), Rogers (NSA), Comey (FBI Counter Intel), and Brennan (CIA) work product. Remember, President Obama preferred written intel briefings which he reviewed from his secure iPad.

https://theconservativetreehouse.co...-to-every-nunes-public-statement-in-sequence/
_____________

It was kind of curious that Nunes went to the WH to meet his source. But Nunes' source was only telling him which dates to view on the daily intelligence briefings that are subject to the SCIF directive.

That intelligence isn't supposed to be transported from one site to another, so Nunes viewed it there. Why go to the trouble of moving it?

And since it was part of the POTUS daily intelligence briefings, Obama was aware that a crime was being committed in unmasking US citizens. As were Brennen and Comey.

But I expect this to go exactly no where.
Click to expand...

HAHAHAHA, "It appears..."
 
Micawber said:
You simply post like any right wing Fox consumer. All the exact same talking points all the time. You are indistinguishable to Sean Hannity, except for your lack of intelligence. It's just strange, you used to be BAC's fluffer for YEARS and resident dissident second in command. To see you morph into a right wing IDIOT is just weird.
Click to expand...

Perhaps if you watched more Fox News you wouldn't have morphed into a leftist moron? Mere words cannot describe the repugnant stupidity you wallow in. Dunce.
 
Althea said:
This is MUCH bigger than Watergate, but not for the reasons you cite.
Click to expand...

There you go people; the gullible "idiots" Gruber described in his behind door comments actually think they can morph this non-story into a scandal.

Any questions?
 
While I appreciate Darth's patience with leftist trolls and idiots, it is all a waste of time and will only end in the predictable circle of stupidity liberals love to wallow in.

FACT: there is no "there" there and when, after all the wasted time, money and investigating is done and nothing comes of it, liberals will still be too stupid, petty, partisan and dishonest to be embarrassed by their repugnant efforts to diminish the Presidency.

Why? Because liberal Fascism does not accept any other views that do not march in goose-step fashion with their own nor are they mature or capable enough to accept the results of an election they demanded from their opposition.
 
Althea said:
It's even more disappointing when you've known him for even longer. It boggles the mind. Fine...he changed ideology because he simply cannot get past his hatred for Clinton.

But the talk of 'deep state' is the most disappointing, especially given all the facts on the table despite trump's extreme actions to hide the truth.
Click to expand...
look dude have some balls and man up if you want to talk about me - you do on FB- so either unmask yourself here
or kindly STFU about my posts here. thanks
 
Althea said:
It's even more disappointing when you've known him for even longer. It boggles the mind. Fine...he changed ideology because he simply cannot get past his hatred for Clinton.

But the talk of 'deep state' is the most disappointing, especially given all the facts on the table despite trump's extreme actions to hide the truth.
Click to expand...
I'll simplify for you..WHO IS DOING THE LEAKING??

It HAS TO BE "IC leadership -only they can decide not to unmask "incidental collections" of US names-
( if the name is a significant part of a report) -otherwise the name in masked.

So get it thru your partisan mind that the IC i using selective leakage to damage Trump..
and then you can see the Deep State.
 
Darth Omar said:
It's your partisan assumption.

They should bring Comey, Brennen and Rodgers before a closed hearing so they can't hide behind the 'can't answer, it's classified' mantra.
Click to expand...
which is what they are dong if i follow this since open hearings are a dog and pony show
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top