Russiaism is the new Birtherism

anatta

100% recycled karma
While the FBI was investigating Bill Clinton for the White Water corruption situation, President Clinton fired the FBI Director. The media took President Clinton’s actions at face value. They did not question him. In fact, conservatives who raised red flags were dismissed. Today, we get to see what happens when a Republican does what Bill Clinton did.

The hysterics from the left over Donald Trump firing James Comey would be silly, except that many reporters who shape the news are part of that contingent. Witness Jeffrey Toobin,
a leftist who CNN gives the veneer of objectivity to, railing about the President of the United States exercising lawful constitutional duty to fire a man many on the left wanted fired. Who is now in charge of the FBI after this? A Democrat whose wife’s run for the Virginia Senate was supported by Clintonites. Yes friends, in the hysteria of claims about Russia, everyone ignored who now runs the FBI. The man is not exactly Trump friendly.

But even the defense does ignore some reasonable nuance. Yes, I think the timing was designed to distract from Sally Yates’ Senate testimony. Yes, it does look bad given the FBI’s ongoing investigation into Russia’s election interference. It comes as a grand jury is issuing subpoenas related to Mike Flynn.

The preponderance of the evidence, however, suggests the President did fire Comey based on the advice of senior Department of Justice officials and not on his own. The preponderance of evidence does suggest that Trump fired Comey because of his botched testimony before congress about Huma Abedin and his handling, in general, of the Clinton email situation. And yes, the preponderance of evidence suggests it was not a coverup considering Andrew McCabe is now in charge of the FBI.

Still, this is another reason why I do think the Russian situation is so serious that it deserves an outside investigation. It deserves resources Republicans demanded of the Whitewater investigation, which only involved a President’s potentially corrupt dealings with a land deal and a law firm. This involves a foreign power attempting to subvert the American democratic process. There is no allegation that President Trump did anything wrong. But there are serious allegations about Russia that deserve a thorough, independent review.

The reality, however, is that many of those most critical of the President firing Comey were the same people demanding Comey be fired for his handling of Hillary Clinton’s emails. We have a hyper-partisan environment in which all sides too easily and too quickly abandon intellectual honesty. It is notable that Lindsey Graham and Susan Collins, two of the GOP’s most strident critics of Donald Trump, are okay with this firing.

It is not a constitutional crisis, nor is it a dark day for democracy. It is a President exercising his constitutional duties on the advice of his cabinet ministers. The timing is bothersome and looks bad, but the underlying rationale suggests the decision was made thoughtfully. However, the left will never believe President Trump nor believe anything other than the worst possible conspiracies about him.
Russiaism is the new Birtherism.

http://theresurgent.com/no-room-for-reason-on-trump-firing-comey/
 
decent article. I don't agree with it all, but i thought the parts about "CNN veneer of objectivity" was spot on
( just enough so you can tell yourself this isn't fake news)..

and of course everything Russia is now the Democratic birtherism -
the difference there is that it infects the entire body-unlike birtherism by the Republicans
 
There were a couple of notable exceptions, but most Democrats did NOT call for Comey's firing despite his election intrusion.

This article is very partisan. How are we supposed to know or trust Trump's motivations for firing Comey when he had his staff give 3 different reasons for the firing, and then threw them all under the bus yesterday by giving a 4th reason?

Another apologist, one-sided thread from anatta.
 
The birtherism parallel is also bull. Sorry, anatta - this is an actual investigation that started w/ the FBI and our intel community. It's not a bunch of conspiracy hearsay.
 
There were a couple of notable exceptions, but most Democrats did NOT call for Comey's firing despite his election intrusion.

This article is very partisan. How are we supposed to know or trust Trump's motivations for firing Comey when he had his staff give 3 different reasons for the firing, and then threw them all under the bus yesterday by giving a 4th reason?

Another apologist, one-sided thread from anatta.
read the article thing -not what it says
The reality, however, is that many of those most critical of the President firing Comey were the same people demanding Comey be fired for his handling of Hillary Clinton’s emails.
the article is far from 1 sided..are you that far gone you're reduced to just using the same meme about anyhting I post?
apparently so. I even mentioned I don't agree with it all, and the article is balanced. Unlike Democrats/yourself.
 
The birtherism parallel is also bull. Sorry, anatta - this is an actual investigation that started w/ the FBI and our intel community. It's not a bunch of conspiracy hearsay.
However, the left will never believe President Trump nor believe anything other than the worst possible conspiracies about him.
Russiaism is the new Birtherism.
they are not one and the same..^ this is the parallel.

If you don't think the left believes "the worst possible conspiracies" (Russiagate and more) -
COMPLETELY WITHOUT ANY PROOF ( i.e.birtherism ) you are completely gone
 
The article is pure hackery. Again - there is no comparison to birtherism.

Your opinion is basically meaningless to me. You're a mindless apologist. Zero credibility.
no worries.
...you've devolved into full fledged TDS.
 
they are not one and the same..^ this is the parallel.

If you don't think the left believes "the worst possible conspiracies" (Russiagate and more) -
COMPLETELY WITHOUT ANY PROOF ( i.e.birtherism ) you are completely gone

What is wrong with you?

There was never a shred of evidence that Obama was born in the radical muslim madrassas of Kenya. The assertion was not only wholly without merit, it did not even pass the laugh test.

Investigating member's of Drumpfs campaign for their potential questionable ties to Russia must at a minimum be based on evidence and probable cause, otherwise America's top law enforcement agency would not be investigating it.

Remind me, what American law enforcement agency was investigating Obama's supposed birth in Kenya?
 
What is wrong with you?

There was never a shred of evidence that Obama was born in the radical muslim madrassas of Kenya. The assertion was not only wholly without merit, it did not even pass the laugh test.

Investigating member's of Drumpfs campaign for their potential questionable ties to Russia must at a minimum be based on evidence and probable cause, otherwise America's top law enforcement agency would not be investigating it.

Remind me, what American law enforcement agency was investigating Obama's supposed birth in Kenya?

The "Russiagate" has become a new bitherism - hang "Russia on or near it- no matter how badly conflated
and you get to deligitimize an entire presidency- just like the Repubs tried to do.
That's the point of the OP..

It is using the Russiagate to deligitimize is the parallel - and the Dems trot it out without regard for the fact there
is no evidence of Russian collusion -which is where it matters or not.
we already know Flynn/Manafort had "Russian ties -maybe "questionable Russian tie"as you say.

But that doesn't de-legitimize Trump's presidency -which birtherism,and the Democratic resistance conflate.
 
There were a couple of notable exceptions, but most Democrats did NOT call for Comey's firing despite his election intrusion.

This article is very partisan. How are we supposed to know or trust Trump's motivations for firing Comey when he had his staff give 3 different reasons for the firing, and then threw them all under the bus yesterday by giving a 4th reason?

Another apologist, one-sided thread from anatta.

Many did. Sorry that conflicts with your narrative, but it is true.

Your side spent months accusing Comey of interfering with the election which is what you also think Russia did.

Why isn't interfering with an election a fireable offense to you?
 
The "Russiagate" has become a new bitherism - hang "Russia on or near it- no matter how badly conflated
and you get to deligitimize an entire presidency- just like the Repubs tried to do.
That's the point of the OP..

It is using the Russiagate to deligitimize is the parallel - and the Dems trot it out without regard for the fact there
is no evidence of Russian collusion -which is where it matters or not.
we already know Flynn/Manafort had "Russian ties -maybe "questionable Russian tie"as you say.

But that doesn't de-legitimize Trump's presidency -which birtherism,and the Democratic resistance conflate.

Wow.

I guess you do not place any value on your credibility. Are you emotionally invested in Drumpf? To the point that you spend endless hours on an obscure message board, even at the expense of your personal life, defending him and providing cover for him?

The premise of your thread is laughable. There is no analogy.

There is a real investigation into members of Drumpfs campaign by a real American law enforcement agency.

Even righwingers - the smart ones - new the birth certificate-Kenya thing was a lie from the get go. Only poorly edumacated knuckledraggers were duped into buying it. Everyone with an IQ over 80 knew what the real objective of the birther nonsense was: to attempt to make American's first black president look vaguely un-American, foreign, something not palatable to middle America. Anything to detract from the facts of who he really was, a mainstream, left of center American politician with a fairly typical and generally recognizable American family story and history.
 
From the article: "While the FBI was investigating Bill Clinton for the White Water corruption situation, President Clinton fired the FBI Director. The media took President Clinton’s actions at face value. They did not question him. In fact, conservatives who raised red flags were dismissed. Today, we get to see what happens when a Republican does what Bill Clinton did."

"Administration officials said Mr. Barr's memorandum adopted the report's findings, concluding that Mr. Sessions falsely claimed a tax exemption on the home-to-work use of his official limousine, billed the Government for personal trips on Federal Bureau of Investigation aircraft, built a security fence for his home at Government expense and did not cooperate with investigators looking into accusations that he received special treatment from a bank on his mortgage loan for his house in Washington."

http://www.nytimes.com/1993/01/19/us/fbi-chief-plans-to-fight-for-job.html
 
From the article: "While the FBI was investigating Bill Clinton for the White Water corruption situation, President Clinton fired the FBI Director. The media took President Clinton’s actions at face value. They did not question him. In fact, conservatives who raised red flags were dismissed. Today, we get to see what happens when a Republican does what Bill Clinton did."

"Administration officials said Mr. Barr's memorandum adopted the report's findings, concluding that Mr. Sessions falsely claimed a tax exemption on the home-to-work use of his official limousine, billed the Government for personal trips on Federal Bureau of Investigation aircraft, built a security fence for his home at Government expense and did not cooperate with investigators looking into accusations that he received special treatment from a bank on his mortgage loan for his house in Washington."

http://www.nytimes.com/1993/01/19/us/fbi-chief-plans-to-fight-for-job.html

Your point ?

Is it that Comey did not deserve to be fired after publically interfering with the election, but Sessions did over tax exemptions ?
 
Wow.

I guess you do not place any value on your credibility. Are you emotionally invested in Drumpf? To the point that you spend endless hours on an obscure message board, even at the expense of your personal life, defending him and providing cover for him?
adhoms are meaningless - just yourself telling yourself you are somehow superior, when you've demonstrated nothing but an ability to boot-lick Hillary.
I work online. it's easy to drop by. Now are you happy I've explained this to you?

The premise of your thread is laughable. There is no analogy.
there is an analogy of purpose - to use rank innuendo
( and recall the Democratic resistance has no core operating principle except de-legitimization)
to de-rail a president. It was disgusting by the Repubs, and it's the same by the Dems

There is a real investigation into members of Drumpfs campaign by a real American law enforcement agency.
no shit Sherlock..and the (one) point of the OP is that:
However, the left will never believe President Trump nor believe anything other than the worst possible conspiracies about him. Russiaism is the new Birtherism.
i didn't write that. The left/fake news media won't even consider anything but the "worst possible conspiracy"
To spoon feed that for you; it doesn't mean one dismisses the FBI investigation.
But conflating everything back to Russiaphobia as a reason ( like Comey's firing here) is the illustration of purpose
Even righwingers - the smart ones - new the birth certificate-Kenya thing was a lie from the get go. Only poorly edumacated knuckledraggers were duped into buying it. Everyone with an IQ over 80 knew what the real objective of the birther nonsense was: to attempt to make American's first black president look vaguely un-American, foreign, something not palatable to middle America. Anything to detract from the facts of who he really was, a mainstream, left of center American politician with a fairly typical and generally recognizable American family story and history.
who cares about Obama's background? why add this in there?
The parallels of birtherism to distract/detract with the Dem's Russiaism hold fast and true.
The other day it was a "Constitutional Crisis!- Watergate redux..lol
 
Wow.

I guess you do not place any value on your credibility. Are you emotionally invested in Drumpf? To the point that you spend endless hours on an obscure message board, even at the expense of your personal life, defending him and providing cover for him?

The premise of your thread is laughable. There is no analogy.

There is a real investigation into members of Drumpfs campaign by a real American law enforcement agency.

Even righwingers - the smart ones - new the birth certificate-Kenya thing was a lie from the get go. Only poorly edumacated knuckledraggers were duped into buying it. Everyone with an IQ over 80 knew what the real objective of the birther nonsense was: to attempt to make American's first black president look vaguely un-American, foreign, something not palatable to middle America. Anything to detract from the facts of who he really was, a mainstream, left of center American politician with a fairly typical and generally recognizable American family story and history.

APPLUASE :hand: :hand:
 
Donald Trump Has Compromised Every Major Investigation Into Alleged Russian Interference
Comey, fired. Nunes, recused. Burr, compromised. There’s a pattern here.

WASHINGTON ― When President Donald Trump fired FBI Director James Comey on Tuesday, it was the latest in a months-long string of actions that have undermined or compromised every major investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and whether Trump campaign associates colluded with Moscow.

The breadth of the president’s interference in the investigations of his own campaign has shocked officials at law enforcement agencies and on Capitol Hill, both for the extent to which it disregards political norms and the potential it has to upend legitimate oversight. And it’s forced a major readjustment within those agencies to try and immunize themselves from White House influence. More than 100 lawmakers, including at least three Republicans, have now called for an independent probe of the Russia matter.

“It’s highly suspicious that the President has now fired at least three people who were investigating his administration, especially in light of his pattern of undermining the ongoing Congressional investigations,” Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) told HuffPost in an email ― referring to Comey, former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, and U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, who was reportedly investigating one of Trump’s Cabinet secretaries. “To get to the bottom of this, we need an independent investigation led by a special prosecutor who has the trust of the American people.”

Trump has been undermining investigations for months. In February,*he compromised the probes of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees alike by enlisting House committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) and Senate committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.), both allies of his, to rebut negative press stories related to the Trump team’s ties to Russia. Then he further undermined the House probe by secretly inviting Nunes to the White House to view intelligence reports — a decision that ultimately led to Nunes recusing himself from the investigation. And this week, Trump undermined the FBI’s investigation into the Russia matter by firing the director who was leading it and then claiming he’d done so on the advice of Rod Rosenstein, the top Justice Department official overseeing it.

It all feels a bit familiar.*

“It is so clumsy and butchered the way he handled it, that the natural conclusion you would come to is that he is trying to block the Russian investigation,” said John Dean, who served as White House counsel for President Richard Nixon. “But again, is he that foolish and blatant? It makes it more likely for a special prosecutor [to be appointed]. And it makes it more likely that the FBI is going to double down.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...e4b00f308cf3f3a1?sn&ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
 
Pffffttthhhht!!!!!!!
ROFLMAO.gif


Not even close!!!!

Somewhere a village is missing at idiot annette, and it's you.
 
Your point ?

Is it that Comey did not deserve to be fired after publically interfering with the election, but Sessions did over tax exemptions ?

The point is that Sessions was a tax cheat and a grifter... come to think of it, just like trump. No wonder you refuse to criticize him.
 
Back
Top