IT’S BEGUN: MOTHER JAILED FOR REFUSING TO VACCINATE SON

Covfefe said:
It should be obvious since the mother was in contempt.
Click to expand...

having pointed out numerous cases from around the country about how government ignores the law or civil decisions in order to enforce a popular position, why the hell would you think this is obvious and NOT answer the question directly?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
I see you're trying to avoid answering the question....
what was the court order she ignored that resulted in a contempt of court citation?
Click to expand...
Judge Karen McDonald wrote that Bredow had signed an agreement to immunize her son in November 2016, and that no appeal of the order, which stemmed from a custody battle, was ever received.Bredow indicated last week she had no plans to follow the judge’s orders, and insisted she’d sooner go to jail than vaccinate her son.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
having pointed out numerous cases from around the country about how government ignores the law or civil decisions in order to enforce a popular position, why the hell would you think this is obvious and NOT answer the question directly?
Click to expand...
Judge Karen McDonald wrote that Bredow had signed an agreement to immunize her son in November 2016, and that no appeal of the order, which stemmed from a custody battle, was ever received.
Bredow said she was never informed of her ex’s desire to vaccinate their son, and that the court decided upon the order without her input.

It sounds like a custody battle and at this point both must have equal rights, but mother was found in contempt because she agreed to immunizations and didn't.

 
Althea said:
Judge Karen McDonald wrote that Bredow had signed an agreement to immunize her son in November 2016, and that no appeal of the order, which stemmed from a custody battle, was ever received.Bredow indicated last week she had no plans to follow the judge’s orders, and insisted she’d sooner go to jail than vaccinate her son.
Click to expand...

thanks. that was exactly what i needed to see.
 
Covfefe said:
Judge Karen McDonald wrote that Bredow had signed an agreement to immunize her son in November 2016, and that no appeal of the order, which stemmed from a custody battle, was ever received.
Bredow said she was never informed of her ex’s desire to vaccinate their son, and that the court decided upon the order without her input.

It sounds like a custody battle and at this point both must have equal rights, but mother was found in contempt because she agreed to immunizations and didn't.
Click to expand...

that works for me. thank you.
 
Althea said:
Refusing to comply with a court order.

Anyone can parent in the fashion they deem fitting. Just keep your diseased kids out of my kid's school.
Click to expand...

fuck no


I will not allow anyone to abuse their child

FOR THAT CHILDS SAKE
 
evince said:
fuck no


I will not allow anyone to abuse their child

FOR THAT CHILDS SAKE
Click to expand...

it's NOT YOUR CALL to tell anyone else what to do to their child if they are not beating, mistreating, or neglecting said children, you evil dictator. are you sure you don't like trump? because isn't he a dictator?
 
yes it is my call you idiot!

this soceity will take your child if you refuse to protect it your self.


and it always will


a child is not a posession
 
evince said:
its child abuse asshole


refusing to allow your child medical care is evil
Click to expand...

Does that include the millions that refused to provide healthcare to their children pre-Obamacare?

How many of them were jailed for abusing their children?
 
evince said:
yes it is my call you idiot!

this soceity will take your child if you refuse to protect it your self.


and it always will


a child is not a posession
Click to expand...

No it's not. That's your problem, bitch. You think the government should raise children. Perhaps that's your fucking problem. Your whore mother let the government do it and see how it turned out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top