Bannon: Trump like an 11 year-old child and Javanka is everything wrong with the WH

Thing1 said:
I'm not really sure how that matters. If Trump organized any kind of obstruction, it would be a fairly serious offense.
Click to expand...
it would not be "organized"..that would mean a conspiracy.
The obstruction could be the Comey firing; in fact that's all that is possible -nothing to do with Russian collusion/conspiracies.

And that would be a hard charge to prove,as it would have to be shown Comey was fired solely by Trump for a corrupt motive
 
blackascoal said:
What voters are you talking about?

SUPPORT FOR DONALD TRUMP’S IMPEACHMENT IS HIGHER THAN HIS RE-ELECTION CHANCES
http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-impeachment-reelection-2020-753546

The economy is doing well right now .. and Trump still remains at HISTORIC lows in approval.
Click to expand...
considering the noise surrounding Trump day by day, and the fact the FBI leadership is just now being shown to be corrupt..it's not all that surprising.

What is really worrisome is Americans don't give a REASON for Impeachment!!

We are entering a phase of really gross ignorance of politics and civics by the American people.
Some of that is the way DC comports itself, but some is just pure stupidity and lack of motivation
to understand ones country's governance
 
noise said:
because I follow politics outside of this board?
Look around for yourself. It's not even on the table
Click to expand...

Not on the table? Investigators have interviewed pretty much everybody associated with that June meeting. Do a search on ANY of those names. Know what you get? Quotes from articles written about that meeting that say things such as (just a couple of examples):

"Trump Jr. had agreed to the meeting with Veselnitskaya after being promised dirt on then-2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. He had been told Veselnitskaya would provide “official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary (Clinton) and her dealings with Russia,” by Rob Goldstone, a British music promoter who works for Russian oligarchs with connections to the Kremlin and who shares business and social connections to the Trumps."

"Donald Trump Jr. accepted the June 9, 2016 meeting after an associate offered him damaging information on Hillary Clinton."

They may not use the word "solicit", but these descriptions fit the definition in CFR to a T.

However, the violation is merely election law and doesn't carry a heavy penalty. Conspiracy, however, does.

Keep your head stuffed up your rectum, moron. It's safer for you there.
 
domer76 said:
Not on the table? Investigators have interviewed pretty much everybody associated with that June meeting. Do a search on ANY of those names. Know what you get? Quotes from articles written about that meeting that say things such as (just a couple of examples):

"Trump Jr. had agreed to the meeting with Veselnitskaya after being promised dirt on then-2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. He had been told Veselnitskaya would provide “official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary (Clinton) and her dealings with Russia,” by Rob Goldstone, a British music promoter who works for Russian oligarchs with connections to the Kremlin and who shares business and social connections to the Trumps."

"Donald Trump Jr. accepted the June 9, 2016 meeting after an associate offered him damaging information on Hillary Clinton."

They may not use the word "solicit", but these descriptions fit the definition in CFR to a T.

However, the violation is merely election law and doesn't carry a heavy penalty. Conspiracy, however, does.

Keep your head stuffed up your rectum, moron. It's safer for you there.
Click to expand...
there was an offer and an acceptance -nowhere was there a solicitation ,and especially no solicitation for a quid pro quo.

You'd have to cite the election law,,and where you see a solitictation..
 
domer76 said:
Not on the table? Investigators have interviewed pretty much everybody associated with that June meeting. Do a search on ANY of those names. Know what you get? Quotes from articles written about that meeting that say things such as (just a couple of examples):

"Trump Jr. had agreed to the meeting with Veselnitskaya after being promised dirt on then-2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. He had been told Veselnitskaya would provide “official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary (Clinton) and her dealings with Russia,” by Rob Goldstone, a British music promoter who works for Russian oligarchs with connections to the Kremlin and who shares business and social connections to the Trumps."

"Donald Trump Jr. accepted the June 9, 2016 meeting after an associate offered him damaging information on Hillary Clinton."

They may not use the word "solicit", but these descriptions fit the definition in CFR to a T.

However, the violation is merely election law and doesn't carry a heavy penalty. Conspiracy, however, does.

Keep your head stuffed up your rectum, moron. It's safer for you there.
Click to expand...

Notice how you bolded the word "accepted".

Now tell us how that fits the definition of solicit.

You won't, because you don't know.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top