the value is tangible, yurtroll
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Bannon: Trump like an 11 year-old child and Javanka is everything wrong with the WH
- Thread starter blackascoal
- Start date
the value is tangible, yurtroll
cancel2 2022
Canceled
He won't, he's just turned into a shit and run poster.Ironic post is ironic.
Prove intent is all that matters. Cite the law or STFU.
Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
LOL, Dumber gets smacked down
Smacked down by a lie?
I don't think so yurtroll
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
yes it is, liar
Cite
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
He won't, he's just turned into a shit and run poster.
Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
I assumed he was always like this. I don't expect him to prove his claims, he is a pathological liar.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
He did try to be a tad more logical and reasoned in the past, nowadays he just shits and runs.I assumed he was always like this. I don't expect him to prove his claims, he is a pathological liar.
Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
the value is tangible, yurtroll
tan·gi·ble
ˈtanjəb(ə)l/Submit
adjective
1.
perceptible by touch.
Stupid Drunktard
For someone who claims to have a patent pending, you know shit about tangible vs intangible. If you had a patent, it is intangible property you fucking epic moron.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
He did try to be a tad more logical and reasoned in the past, nowadays he just shits and runs.
Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
It is clear as day he is a raging alcoholic. Hopefully he gets help.
Fair enough.
The fly in the ointment for democrats is Comey. If Comey brings an obstruction indictment congressional democrats are going to feel some significant pressure to bring impeachment charges—-regardless of whether most democrats in congress think it’s a good idea or not.
Many of their constituents want Trump gone—-they don’t care how it’s done.
Comey can't bring charges you fucking halfwit. STFU
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
the value is tangible, yurtroll
Can you TOUCH it?
the patent is intellectual property (assets) -yestan·gi·ble
ˈtanjəb(ə)l/Submit
adjective
1.
perceptible by touch.
Stupid Drunktard
For someone who claims to have a patent pending, you know shit about tangible vs intangible. If you had a patent, it is intangible property you fucking epic moron.
you are beyond stupid. There needs to be a word for just you- 'Runesque' type stupidity.There didn't need to be an actual gain;
intent is all that is required and intent was proven by e-mails.
You may want to reconsider whom you call stupid...as BAC said you are not illustrating much intelligence.
you are the one that brought up "illegal gains".
Not only can you not connect dots, you can't even follow an idea in conversation.
"Intent" for WHAT?? exactly ( and if you say "illegal gains" kindly blow out your brains first)
There had to be a solicitation of an offer by the Trump camp.
there was none, much less a collusion with the Russian lawyer/agent as acceptance
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
the patent is intellectual property (assets) -yes
Correct. And?
don't see any solicitation..not all at.. "something of value" is likely tangible goods
Yep. Right up there with Yaya on illiteracy. The definitions are there.
Too bad for that willful ignorance.
Hillary’s campaign did it first lol?
You’d have to check with the firm that hired the firm, wouldn’t you? Unlike with Donnie, you just ask him directly.
Pathetic stretch.
you're so much fun, debating with a dumbass is soooo delightful.
So tell us, "dumber" what did Trump solicit? and receive?
As with the other illiterate fucks, you fail to comprehend written English. Find where 300.2 requires receipt of anything.
Sad little fucktard.
Ironic post is ironic.
Prove intent is all that matters. Cite the law or STFU.
The law has been cited.
Donnie’s excitement over the prospect of dirt exists in his emails.
Stupid Trumptard apologist.
We’ll ignore the offer/solicit distinction because I don’t want to waste bandwidth on it with you.
What manner of logical contortions exempts Hillary’s campaign from the same charge? Why is it criminal ‘solicitation’ when Trump attempts it but ‘opposition research’ when Hillary actually does it—-AND pays for it, for crying out loud.
Or is it like Comey’s ‘extreme carelessness’ rewrite?
Donnie in the first person, baby!
Let’s see, the Clinton campaign hired a firm that hired a firm that contacted who? Steele? Not a Russian.
Hillary? Nope
Donnie? Face to face, baby!
Darth Omar
Russian asset
you are beyond stupid. There needs to be a word for just you- 'Runesque' type stupidity.
you are the one that brought up "illegal gains".
Not only can you not connect dots, you can't even follow an idea in conversation.
"Intent" for WHAT?? exactly ( and if you say "illegal gains" kindly blow out your brains first)
There had to be a solicitation of an offer by the Trump camp.
there was none, much less a collusion with the Russian lawyer/agent as acceptance
That whole thing was kind of sketchy anyway.
The Russian adoption lawyer had ties to Fusion GPS. It’s entirely plausible that the meeting was a set up to try and entice Junior into doing something illegal—-like offering to pay for dirt on Hillary. If Fusion was trying to validate the claims in the Dossier they were pushing, then it makes perfect sense they would try and set up Junior.
As it is, the meeting was a dud. And there isn’t a national level politician that would turn down *freely offered* dirt from Russians—-Hitler himself or Attila The Fricking Hun, for that matter.
It is actually intangible you fucking eternal retard. You can't touch it you eternal retard.
Good job Mr. I am a genius!
300.2 doesn’t say “tangible”.
Next, retard.