Bailey Holt. 15. Say her name NRA.

Half the liberal Democrats want to take our guns away, the other half wants to take our Bibles away. Make my decision in the voting booth that much easier.
 
WinterBorn said:
I call it what it is. It is negligence by the people who treat the dangerously mentally ill.

The good use buying a gun makes sense. They are used hundreds of thousands of times a year to stop or prevent a crime. They are also used to put meat on the table for many people. And not just the hunters. Many who hunt donate meat to food banks and shelters.
Click to expand...

The odds of a person to be injured by their own gun is greater than them being protected by it. Now, place a disabled person in that equation.
 
WinterBorn said:
YOu are advocating removing the rights of thousands of people because of what they "might" do.
Click to expand...

Well, what do you think any law does?

I am advocating keeping as many weapons out of the hands of people deemed incapable of taking care of themselves. Snd you keep inserting just those who can’t keep track of finances.

Due process for all.
 
domer76 said:
Look up the processes to diagnose and determine mental illness yourself, lazy fuck. I did.
Click to expand...

That has ZERO to do with being put on the list you dumbass. You're even entitled to an attorney to be deemed mentally unfit you stupid stupid person.

Just stop talking about the law, you know Jack shit
 
domer76 said:
Well, what do you think any law does?

I am advocating keeping as many weapons out of the hands of people deemed incapable of taking care of themselves. Snd you keep inserting just those who can’t keep track of finances.

Due process for all.
Click to expand...

Inability to keep track of finances is not the only reason people get a payee.

And yes, due process for all.
 
WinterBorn said:
That old crock of shit has been debunked so many times.
Click to expand...

Wrong again.

"a gun in the home was far more likely to be used to threaten a family member or intimate partner than to be used in self-defense."

http://www.slate.com/articles/healt...e_the_risk_of_homicide_accidents_suicide.html

"For every time a gun in the home was used in a self-defense or legally justifiable shooting, there were four unintentional shootings, seven criminal assaults or homicides, and 11 attempted or completed suicides."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/9715182/

"Guns kept in the home are more likely to be involved in a fatal or nonfatal unintentional shooting, criminal assault or suicide attempt than to be used to injure or kill in self-defense."

http://lawcenter.giffords.org/guns-in-the-homesafe-storage-statistics/#footnote_1_6247

"If you have a gun, everybody in your home is more likely than your non-gun-owning neighbors and their families to die in a gun-related accident, suicide or homicide.
Furthermore, there is no credible evidence that having a gun in your house reduces your risk of being a victim of a crime. Nor does it reduce your risk of being injured during a home break-in."

https://www.minnpost.com/second-opinion/2012/12/health-risk-having-gun-home
 
Yaya said:
Then what else is it? They haven't done anything, so it can only be what they MIGHT do.

Poor Dumber, doesn't even know he argues against himself.
Click to expand...

Your idiotic logic does away with ALL background checks then, you fucking idiot.
 
domer76 said:
The odds of a person to be injured by their own gun is greater than them being protected by it. Now, place a disabled person in that equation.
Click to expand...

Liberals keep posting that, with no verification, and it appears that they're just trying to convince themselves that's it fact. :palm:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top