hvilleherb
Verified User
Half the liberal Democrats want to take our guns away, the other half wants to take our Bibles away. Make my decision in the voting booth that much easier.
I call it what it is. It is negligence by the people who treat the dangerously mentally ill.
The good use buying a gun makes sense. They are used hundreds of thousands of times a year to stop or prevent a crime. They are also used to put meat on the table for many people. And not just the hunters. Many who hunt donate meat to food banks and shelters.
YOu are advocating removing the rights of thousands of people because of what they "might" do.
What hearing did they have to take their second amendment rights taken away?
Why do you believe mentally ill people should not own guns or be on the list?
Look up the processes to diagnose and determine mental illness yourself, lazy fuck. I did.
Too stupid a question to answer.
The odds of a person to be injured by their own gun is greater than them being protected by it. Now, place a disabled person in that equation.
Well, what do you think any law does?
I am advocating keeping as many weapons out of the hands of people deemed incapable of taking care of themselves. Snd you keep inserting just those who can’t keep track of finances.
Due process for all.
That old crock of shit has been debunked so many times.
Translation : because I fear what they MIGHT do.
You can't even debate coherently, you are mentally unfit to where you need a guardian.
^Too illiterate to comprehend.
Then what else is it? They haven't done anything, so it can only be what they MIGHT do.
Poor Dumber, doesn't even know he argues against himself.
Your idiotic logic does away with ALL background checks then, you fucking idiot.
You argued against might... Now you're arguing for it.... Retard
Too many "mights" in the article. Pure speculation.
"Might" = speculation
Why do you believe mentally ill people should not own guns or be on the list?
You "might" have to return to my posts and find such speculation.
The odds of a person to be injured by their own gun is greater than them being protected by it. Now, place a disabled person in that equation.