Life After the Memo

noise said:
the FBI never confirmed the Steele dossier; in fact they sought a warrant based on "minimal corroboration"
as well as circular reporting ( Ishakoff article)..there was nothing there.
Click to expand...

FALSE you liar!
 
noise said:
OMG. "why is it important how it kicked off?" are you FUCKING SERIOUS??

do you have no understanding of swearing out a FISA warrant based on veracity??
Click to expand...

I don't question how it started. I'm just abandoning that point because you're determined to believe it wasn't justified, no matter what.

But if people are guilty, and there was wrongdoing - sorry, it doesn't matter. It's like finding a building full of coke and arguing over whether the search warrant was properly obtained.
 
Jarod said:
What was bogus about it?
Click to expand...
read the letter. I am tired of trying to get thru your partisan minds.Grassley lays it out.
Or else I'm going to make you watch Hannity :wink3:

The FISA application was sworn on the Steele dossier ( the terms are "bulk of the application/ minimally corroborated)
 
"The Papadopoulos information triggered the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016 by FBI agent Pete Strzok," the memo noted in its final paragraph.
 
noise said:
hey BAC?
anytime you want to engage -feel free to do so,otherwise your drive by's of nothing to say will be continued to be ignored
Click to expand...

I don't give a rats ass if you respond or not.

I'm going to continue to point out your absolute ignorance in all of this.
 
Thing1 said:
I don't question how it started. I'm just abandoning that point because you're determined to believe it wasn't justified, no matter what.

But if people are guilty, and there was wrongdoing - sorry, it doesn't matter. It's like finding a building full of coke and arguing over whether the search warrant was properly obtained.
Click to expand...
in which case the arrests would be thrown out of court.

You have ZERO appreciation/understanding of civil liberties ( due process) like many Dems when it comes
to Trump.
 
blackascoal said:
I don't give a rats ass if you respond or not.

I'm going to continue to point out your absolute ignorance in all of this.
Click to expand...
you are pointing out NOTHING you ignorant rube.
Simply saying "you don't understand FISA" without saying WHY is not saying anything at all
 
noise said:
you are pointing out NOTHING you ignorant rube.
Simply saying "you don't understand FISA" without saying WHY is not saying anything at all
Click to expand...

"The Papadopoulos information triggered the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016 by FBI agent Pete Strzok," the memo noted in its final paragraph.

Stupid assclown.
 
"Even if the controversial Steele dossier and the FISA surveillance of Page had sparked the special counsel’s inquiry, this would not be the first time that politically motivated information led to a special counsel investigation. Conservative businessman Richard Mellon Scaife gave $2 million to the American Spectator in the early 1990s to investigate President Bill Clinton’s real estate investments and sexual harassment claims against him. Information from the reporting Scaife funded led in part the appointment of Kenneth Starr to investigate Clinton."

Idiot
 
blackascoal said:
"The Papadopoulos information triggered the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016 by FBI agent Pete Strzok," the memo noted in its final paragraph.

Stupid assclown.
Click to expand...
The memo isn't the be-all, nor would an investigation go anywhere without some sort of corroboration/progress.
In other words TO SPELL IT OUT FOR YOU there would not have been a full bore year+ investigation without SOMETHING to keep it going. Papadoupolis might be the spark,but the fire would never have stayed lit ( etc)

That "something" was the Page FISA warrants..
 
blackascoal said:
"Even if the controversial Steele dossier and the FISA surveillance of Page had sparked the special counsel’s inquiry, this would not be the first time that politically motivated information led to a special counsel investigation. Conservative businessman Richard Mellon Scaife gave $2 million to the American Spectator in the early 1990s to investigate President Bill Clinton’s real estate investments and sexual harassment claims against him. Information from the reporting Scaife funded led in part the appointment of Kenneth Starr to investigate Clinton."

Idiot
Click to expand...
nice. take up a 1/2 page with "whataboutism".. you are showing WHY special prosecutors are odious.
 
noise said:
The memo isn't the be-all, nor would an investigation go anywhere without some sort of corroboration/progress.
In other words TO SPELL IT OUT FOR YOU there would not have been a full bore year+ investigation without SOMETHING to keep it going. Papadoupolis might be the spark,but the fire would never have stayed lit ( etc)

That "something" was the Page FISA warrants..
Click to expand...

'Something' you pulled right out of your ass.
 
noise said:
ROFL..cat got your tongue? once again you got nothing. Partisanship has completely fucked over your mind
Click to expand...

:rofl2:

I post truth, you post some bullshit you pulled out of your ass.

You're a fucking idiot. All the bullshit you claimed has been proven to be just bullshit.

Take this with your dumb ass as you run out the door.

DEMOCRATS HAVE WON EVERY ELECTION SINCE TRUMP WAS 'ELECTED.'

8 AND 0.

Your side really has it going on. ;0)

Midterms .. money laundering
 
archives said:
What a load of crap, "alleged," "alleged," "alleged," and then this one goes out any makes sweeping generalizations employing near every talk radio talking point echoed for the last three months, conservatives just got to have their existential threat, can't remember a recent time when they didn't have some conspiracy floating out there
Click to expand...

It is being alleged by the Republican memo. If you take that at its face value then they are doing something pretty bad. It is something that must be investigated.
 
noise said:
read the letter. I am tired of trying to get thru your partisan minds.Grassley lays it out.
Or else I'm going to make you watch Hannity :wink3:

The FISA application was sworn on the Steele dossier ( the terms are "bulk of the application/ minimally corroborated)
Click to expand...

If I am not mistaken there a suddle admission at the conclusion of the Nunes memo that the Russian investigation had actually began beforehand, "Papadoppulos information triggered the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016."

And "in an appearance on "Fox & Friends," Nunes was asked about reports over the weekend that the FBI application did refer to a political entity connected to the dossier. Nunes conceded that a "footnote" to that effect was included in the application"

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/05/fbi-footnote-carter-page-warrant-390795

Tough to negate the facts, spin perhaps, but not refute
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top