This European comedy sketch explains how the world sees America’s gun problem

Gotcha68 said:
Considering I didn't mention what words I would add then your comment is just your opinion. I personally don't care if people own guns. I personally do care that the public in general has access to guns which can kill scores of people in a very short time. There is no need for the public to have those kinds of guns. To target shoot? To slaughter deer with? What exactly do we need such guns out in the public for?
Click to expand...

You don't have to mention those words specifically. When you think it's your place to determine what someone else needs and doesn't need, it's very easy to figure into what category the words you would use fit.

Appears to me as if your simply to cowardly to say them.
 
RB 60 said:
Just keep in mind, most of our military and law enforcement are private gun owners themselves.
Click to expand...

And? They do the bidding of the leader of this country, remember. As long as they get to keep their guns I imagine many of them won't care if you have yours.
 
CFM said:
You don't have to mention those words specifically. When you think it's your place to determine what someone else needs and doesn't need, it's very easy to figure into what category the words you would use fit.

Appears to me as if your simply to cowardly to say them.
Click to expand...

You mean like some on here who feel it's up to them to determine that a woman who finds herself pregnant should be forced to carry it cause you all know better than her what's good for her?

I in no way indicated I want guns taken away. I said I do not understand why a civilian needs a gun that can shoot a whole lot of people in a short space of time. Why? What's your answer to that question?
 
Gotcha68 said:
And? They do the bidding of the leader of this country, remember. As long as they get to keep their guns I imagine many of them won't care if you have yours.
Click to expand...

They don't think like liberals, rest assured. They took an oath to protect the constitution.

oath.jpg


Many consider it for life.
 
RB 60 said:
They don't think like liberals, rest assured. They took an oath to protect the constitution.
Click to expand...

It's mandatory- or you don't get paid.

People join the army for a job and the money. Recruiting sergeants who holler ' patriotism ' don't last long.

Where did you undertake your personal brainwashing ?
 
moon2012 said:
It's mandatory- or you don't get paid.

People join the army for a job and the money. Recruiting sergeants who holler ' patriotism ' don't last long.

Where did you undertake your personal brainwashing ?
Click to expand...

From them themselves.
 
Gotcha68 said:
Funny enough they aren't being used against the govt plus they are useless when the govt has bigger and better.
Click to expand...

to keep freedom, we must accept that bad people will do bad things. and if the gov is going to use bigger and better to oppress us, then we should have those same weapons.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
to keep freedom, we must accept that bad people will do bad things. and if the gov is going to use bigger and better to oppress us, then we should have those same weapons.
Click to expand...

Under a system of ' government for the people by the people ' we are the government. Sure- nobody should have to suffer mindless oppression ( like the Palestinians do ) but good politicians with good policies prevent violence. That's why we have elections, isn't it- to get rid of any administration that starts to stink ?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
to keep freedom, we must accept that bad people will do bad things. and if the gov is going to use bigger and better to oppress us, then we should have those same weapons.
Click to expand...

So you believe average citizens should have access to bombs? Missiles? Nukes? Cause the govt has those too.
 
moon2012 said:
Under a system of ' government for the people by the people ' we are the government. Sure- nobody should have to suffer mindless oppression ( like the Palestinians do ) but good politicians with good policies prevent violence. That's why we have elections, isn't it- to get rid of any administration that starts to stink ?
Click to expand...

any elected official can turn on a dime and react badly on a moments notice. it's why we must always be prepared.
 
Gotcha68 said:
So you believe average citizens should have access to bombs? Missiles? Nukes? Cause the govt has those too.
Click to expand...

do you think the government would nuke us? launch missile carried chem weapons at us? anything you think the gov would use against us, we have a right to have as well.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
do you think the government would nuke us? launch missile carried chem weapons at us? anything you think the gov would use against us, we have a right to have as well.
Click to expand...

Do I believe they would? Yes. Kent State comes to mind. Agent Orange. Waco. Ruby Ridge. Native Americans. Philadelphia neighborhood.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
to keep freedom, we must accept that bad people will do bad things. and if the gov is going to use bigger and better to oppress us, then we should have those same weapons.
Click to expand...

Ah, we finally found an honest gun-hugger. So you'd like to see citizens own fully-operational tanks, missile launchers (and missiles to go with them), incapacitating gases of various types and strengths, bombers, armed helicopters, etc. etc.?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
any elected official can turn on a dime and react badly on a moments notice. it's why we must always be prepared.
Click to expand...

Who gets to define "react badly"? How bad is bad? I think Trump is a clear and present danger to our country. Does that give me the right to go to DC and eliminate the perceived threat, according to your lights?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top