Question for Trump & Trumptards re: giving teachers guns....

NOVA said:
Putin must be having continuous orgasms watching the Democrats and progressives and CNN/MSNBC attack the President, the Constitution, our laws, and our freedoms 24-7 without letup....

you pinheads should demand to be put on his payroll for all work you're doing on his behalf....
Click to expand...

How many Democrats have been indicted or pleaded guilty in the Russian probe so far?

Who softened their own party platform in favor of the Russians?

Who made comments about the firing of the FBI director as being about the "Russian thing"?

Tick tock, motherfucker.
 
Nomad said:
Given the fact(s) that....

A) ...bullets don't always hit their intended target, or....

B) ...they often times pass through their target (in this case, soft human tissue) barely even slowing down, then strike some non-intended target (like another person) on the other side, and....

C) ....they are known to ricochet around, again, often striking some non-intended target, again, like another person....

1) ....tell us why you think it would be such a great idea to have even MORE bullets flying around inside a confined space, surrounded by concrete walls with metal lockers on them and steel door frames and various other hard surfaces for these bullets to bounce off of striking God knows what or WHO, and....

2).... who will be held LIABLE when autopsy reports conclude that someone's child or another adult school employee died or was permanently injured by a bullet that was fired, not from the gun of the attacker, but from the gun of a teacher or administrator who was returning fire, and lawsuits start being filed? The teacher/administrator themselves? The county/taxpayers?

Have any of you geniuses ever considered any of those highly likely scenarios?

Or do you think it will be like on TV where the bullets always either hit the bad guy and lodge in his innards or just fly harmlessly off into space where they magically disappear?

Just wondering.

If nothing else, it should be entertaining to see the creative bullshit nonsense replies the barrel strokers come up with.
Click to expand...

Congrats, idiot! That was your most ignorant post to date! Why don't you reward yourself with a juicy, chewy Tide pod! Before I answer you, I want to give you an opportunity to redeem yourself by answering 1 question for me: What do you think would be the primary reason that a TEACHER would be packing heat in a SCHOOL? Please, no politics or smart ass remarks. I can answer it with 4 words! Get back to me, and I'll walk you through it
 
Nomad said:
Sure there is.

Enact strict laws that severely restrict the sale of guns.

Close the gun show loophole.

Make it illegal to privately sell a gun anywhere.

Take these undercover narcotics cops who set up drug buy stings and have them set up gun purchase
stings. If you get busted for privately selling a gun, even a legally obtained one, and go to prison.

Make it difficult and time consuming to obtain a gun and make the penalty for illegally selling one as harsh as importing large quantities of heroin.
Click to expand...

That's a good start.
 
Nomad said:
Semantics.

Change the law.

Close the loophole, which is EXACTLY what it is.

Ban all private sales by non-licensed sellers.

All gun sales must go through licensed dealers.
Click to expand...

what else would you like to see a republican filled government regulate between private individuals? garage sales? even more invasive of personal privacy? I realize you idiots can't think too long term about this shit, being that instant gratification is something you were raised on, but banning private sales does jack shit and will not stop. thousands of us who do believe in the 2nd Amendment would not comply, would also retaliate violently against those who try to enforce it.
 
Nomad said:
Yes, but they're still illegal, aren't they?

Are you suggesting that drugs like cocaine, meth and heroin should be legal just because they still get sold to and used by people?
Click to expand...

Just like the idiots who try to make the absurd car/gun analogy, he tries the same with drugs.

Drug addiction in this country is a serious problem and is what drives the illegal sales. The need for mind-altering substances has been with mankind since the beginning. After reading the garbage from some of these barrel-strokers, the argument could be made for their addiction, I suppose. Certainly, at least a substantial fetish.

Illegal drugs are rampant because of cheap price and demand. I can manufacture cocaine, meth or heroin in my garage. Some of these idiots probably think they could mass produce an AR, as well. Just another of their delusional thoughts.

You make that AR so expensive on the black market, that kid is unable to purchase one. Same with the ammo.

Lastly, possession of meth, coke etc. often has little legal ramifications for the user. Got an AR? Let the feds house you for a decade.
 
hvilleherb said:
Democrats always look for solutions that cost the taxpayers more money. This one doesn't cost taxpayers a dime. Teachers who want to keep their job take a conceal carry class and buy a gun and ammo and bring their weapon concealed into the classroom each day.
Click to expand...

Fat is it would cost mega millions. Trump said he wanted to give teachers a bonus for carrying. The percent he started with, which is a quarter of what he ended with was 700,000 teachers getting bonuses. So on what planet does this not cost taxpayers money?

Who would pay for the teachers liability insurance? Who would pay for bystanders injured by the teacher? Can you imagine what a forensics nightmare it would be to determine if it was the shooter or the teacher that shot a person? Who would pay for teachers weapon? how about the training? How about the constant practice costs?
 
christiefan915 said:
I don't get the "gun-free zone" argument. Most of what makes up living areas is a gun-free zone even if it's not spelled out on a sign. Hospitals, businesses, restaurants, stores... we (I) just take for granted that guns aren't going to be openly carried in these places. I know different states have different laws but it would unnerve me to see ordinary people (not cops) walking around openly carrying here.
Click to expand...

I would leave any business that allowed some civilian penis-challenged moron to lug his firearm(s) around inside.
 
domer76 said:
How many Democrats have been indicted or pleaded guilty in the Russian probe so far?

Who softened their own party platform in favor of the Russians?

Who made comments about the firing of the FBI director as being about the "Russian thing"?

Tick tock, motherfucker.
Click to expand...
Well, lets see. Flynn was a dem, Manafort has worked for dems, I've never heard of this Gates fellow, so he's a toss up, the 13 russians that have been indicted are communists(and I don't care what you say, they are), and it's REALLY hard to tell a communist from a demorat these days, so that makes 15 dems that have been indicted or plead guilty by my reckoning. Okay, so who softened their own party platform in favor of the Russians? I seem to remember HRC with a reset button, and obama gettin' cozy with some russian talking about having to wait for something or other until he got re-elected, so point demorats! As to comey, point GOP. The prez can pretty much fire anyone he wants, for any reason, and I think he had a pretty good reason after the way comey handled the email scandal. Have any of you Trump haters ever considered that firing comey can't be obstruction of justice if he can still testify? Hasn't Mueller spent a good amount of time with him already?:dunno:
 
SmarterthanYou said:
do you have anything logical for an argument? are you incapable of anything other than penis envy comparisons to people who carry a gun?
Click to expand...

I think we've all seen well-crafted arguments by the dozen here against having teachers carrying guns at school. No point in rehashing what you've already rejected. As for the notion that some dumbass contard needs to openly carry his precious bang-bang stick in Target or Panera or Starbucks or Macy's because 2nd Amendment -- no point in even debating that; it's ridiculous.
 
callinectes said:
Well, lets see. Flynn was a dem, Manafort has worked for dems, I've never heard of this Gates fellow, so he's a toss up, the 13 russians that have been indicted are communists(and I don't care what you say, they are), and it's REALLY hard to tell a communist from a demorat these days, so that makes 15 dems that have been indicted or plead guilty by my reckoning. Okay, so who softened their own party platform in favor of the Russians? I seem to remember HRC with a reset button, and obama gettin' cozy with some russian talking about having to wait for something or other until he got re-elected, so point demorats! As to comey, point GOP. The prez can pretty much fire anyone he wants, for any reason, and I think he had a pretty good reason after the way comey handled the email scandal. Have any of you Trump haters ever considered that firing comey can't be obstruction of justice if he can still testify? Hasn't Mueller spent a good amount of time with him already?:dunno:
Click to expand...

lol

This whole concept is difficult for you, isn’t it?

But denial comes easy.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
I think we've all seen well-crafted arguments by the dozen here against having teachers carrying guns at school. No point in rehashing what you've already rejected. As for the notion that some dumbass contard needs to openly carry his precious bang-bang stick in Target or Panera or Starbucks or Macy's because 2nd Amendment -- no point in even debating that; it's ridiculous.
Click to expand...

right, no logical argument, only your feels and delusions with no answers to direct questions. no point in even debating THAT.
 
Nordberg said:
Fat is it would cost mega millions. Trump said he wanted to give teachers a bonus for carrying. The percent he started with, which is a quarter of what he ended with was 700,000 teachers getting bonuses. So on what planet does this not cost taxpayers money?

Who would pay for the teachers liability insurance? Who would pay for bystanders injured by the teacher? Can you imagine what a forensics nightmare it would be to determine if it was the shooter or the teacher that shot a person? Who would pay for teachers weapon? how about the training? How about the constant practice costs?
Click to expand...

Only simpletons like Trump and his Trumptards are advocating such an absurd practice.

The tactical experts on active shooter events agree.
 
domer76 said:
Only simpletons like Trump and his Trumptards are advocating such an absurd practice.

The tactical experts on active shooter events agree.
Click to expand...

If you goof balls were in an active shooter situation couldn’t run to the nearest law abiding gun owner for protection fast enough lol.
 
callinectes said:
Well, lets see. Flynn was a dem, Manafort has worked for dems, I've never heard of this Gates fellow, so he's a toss up, the 13 russians that have been indicted are communists(and I don't care what you say, they are), and it's REALLY hard to tell a communist from a demorat these days, so that makes 15 dems that have been indicted or plead guilty by my reckoning. Okay, so who softened their own party platform in favor of the Russians? I seem to remember HRC with a reset button, and obama gettin' cozy with some russian talking about having to wait for something or other until he got re-elected, so point demorats! As to comey, point GOP. The prez can pretty much fire anyone he wants, for any reason, and I think he had a pretty good reason after the way comey handled the email scandal. Have any of you Trump haters ever considered that firing comey can't be obstruction of justice if he can still testify? Hasn't Mueller spent a good amount of time with him already?:dunno:
Click to expand...

You win the dumbest post of the year award. Congratulations.
 
Darth Omar said:
If you goof balls were in an active shooter situation couldn’t run to the nearest law abiding gun owner for protection fast enough lol.
Click to expand...

Another piece of concocted “if” feces.

You fucking morons are closer to Barney Fife than Rambo. You just don’t know it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top