Giuliani not ruling out chance of Trump taking the Fifth

[canceled.2021.1]

Total mischaracterization of what I said

Not at all.

Thank you for admitting that Obama had a criminal administration who avoided prison by merely exercising their 5th Amendment right not to incriminate themselves.

I am especially grateful that you have finally admitted that Lois Lerner broke the law. Good for you. I knew you could do it eventually

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Go back to the Obama years. remember Lois Lerner ??? You crucified her for taking the 5th. Oh, we forget so quickly. I guess its hard to keep track of all the many ID's.

I never did. You LIED about what I said here. You constantly lie.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

The pussy Jarod still won't answer whether innocent people can claim the fifth. Therefore, he believes they can't.

What a fake POS lawyer.

 

[Jarod]

The fifth doesn't say only those that would incriminate themselves may take the fifth you dirty liar.

It says you can’t be forced to testify AGAINST yourself in a criminal case.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

It says you can’t be forced to testify AGAINST yourself in a criminal case.

Anyone can take the fifth you POS fake lawyer. Even innocent people.

 

[katzgar]

Anyone can take the fifth you POS fake lawyer. Even innocent people.

but if trump uses it we know he is guilty.

 

[katzgar]

You said I said that you lying shit. I said the opposite you lying shit. You lied and got busted.

you are embarrassing yourself trying to defend trump

 

[Jarod]

Anyone can take the fifth you POS fake lawyer. Even innocent people.

Simply not true.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

you are embarrassing yourself trying to defend trump

Where have I defended Trump? This your second false accusation against me in this thread.

 

[Phantasmal]

Perhaps, don't know, more than Stormy? Wonder if Rudy will be asked to spank him with a rolled up magazine as well.

Probably already has, Trump loves him in drag.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Simply not true.

Supreme Court says you're a dummy and flat out wrong.

When a defendant pleads the Fifth, jurors are not permitted to take the refusal to testify into consideration when deciding whether a defendant is guilty. In the 2001 case Ohio v. Reiner, the U.S. Supreme Court held that “a witness may have a reasonable fear of prosecution and yet be innocent of any wrongdoing. The [Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination] serves to protect the innocent who otherwise might be ensnared by ambiguous circumstances.” This case beefed up an earlier ruling that prosecutors can’t ask a jury to draw an inference of guilt from a defendant’s refusal to testify in his own defense.
https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-rights/fifth-amendment-right-against-self-incrimination.html

Read it and weep you fake lawyer. Any defendant cannot be forced to testify. So now what, you going to claim SCOTUS is wrong?

Idiot

 

[Phantasmal]

According to Jarod, Lois lerner is guilty.

She probably was, she didn’t want to speak because the things she would say could be used against her.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

She probably was, she didn’t want to speak because the things she would say could be used against her.

She could be innocent and not want to get ensnared in an ambiguous circumstance.

 

[Phantasmal]

According to Jarod, Lois lerner is guilty.

She probably was, in my opinion, she didn’t want to speak because the things she would say could be used against her. It doesn’t make you guilty, but your words could be used by the prosecutor to incriminate you. It’s rather convoluted.

 

[Darth Omar]

Who said you could convict somebody for pleading the fifth? What a fucking stupid statement.

You’re issue is with whoever it was I was responding to lol.

One of your lefty buddies.

 

[Phantasmal]

Why is it I always have to prove claims and prove you're wrong when you NEVER prove your claims.

You're saying innocent people do not have the right to plead the fifth. That is such bullshit. No way no how a lawyer doesn't know that.

Do you really need me to prove to you that innocent people do not have the fifth amendment right to not testify?

Really? Seriously?

Trump says it means guilt

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

She probably was, in my opinion, she didn’t want to speak because the things she would say could be used against her. It doesn’t make you guilty, but your words could be used by the prosecutor to incriminate you. It’s rather convoluted.

If you are on the jury, you are not allowed to infer that.

 

[Jarod]

Supreme Court says you're a dummy and flat out wrong.

When a defendant pleads the Fifth, jurors are not permitted to take the refusal to testify into consideration when deciding whether a defendant is guilty. In the 2001 case Ohio v. Reiner, the U.S. Supreme Court held that “a witness may have a reasonable fear of prosecution and yet be innocent of any wrongdoing. The [Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination] serves to protect the innocent who otherwise might be ensnared by ambiguous circumstances.” This case beefed up an earlier ruling that prosecutors can’t ask a jury to draw an inference of guilt from a defendant’s refusal to testify in his own defense.
https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-rights/fifth-amendment-right-against-self-incrimination.html

Read it and weep you fake lawyer. Any defendant cannot be forced to testify. So now what, you going to claim SCOTUS is wrong?

Idiot

In what way does that contradict what I said?

 

[Jarod]

If you are on the jury, you are not allowed to infer that.

Absolutely true

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Trump says it means guilt

Really? Gee, I had no idea....

Thank you captain obvious!