It's easy to account for it. One business that's paying has determined it's worth a certain amount and another that determined a different amount. Never said there was a standard that Job A is worth amount B. The standard is determined by the one doing the paying which means the amount can vary based on the one making the decision..
You keep dodging. Why not just admit that you're pulling this all from your ass.
Walmart pays its retail workers $10/hr, Costco pays them $18/hr. So are their skills worth $10/hr or $18/hr? You're the one who said skill correlates to pay, so correlate that mess.
It's easy if those Walmart people don't like the pay their. Apply at Costco. There's a reason a lot won't get hired just like a lot of those working at McDonald's, BK, Wendy's, etc. won't get hired at a five star restaurant. It's the person.
YOU DID SAY THERE WAS A STANDARD.
You've said it several times.
You said a $5/hr job is worth $5/hr.
Now you're being tested because you're realizing that no standard actually exists.
What a phony. I caught you in your own flawed rhetoric.
PS: everyone in your life is laughing at you.
You have it wrong and leave out things. A skill determines the way with the one paying determining what that wage is worth.
There's no way you will ever verify any of your claims about yourself.
You hide behind the shadow of anonymity the internet provides because you're a coward and a loser.
But if you want to play that game, fine.
I know people in your life and none of them say you're an actual business owner. In fact, they all say you're a poseur who is on SSDI.
It's the exact same job. Yet one pays $18/hr and one pays $10/hr. Same skill set. Same level of experience. Yet one wage nearly double the other.
So your entire argument crumbles because of that. There's no way you can square your shit ass argument with that disparity in wages for the exact same job.
That's why you fail here, and that's probably why you fail at life.
The real value is both.
So you'll agree that the skill set for a retail worker is worth $18/hr.
So why can't $18/hr be that minimum wage if you have a business saying that is the value of the skill set?
This is your argument, by the way.
One payer has determined one amount and the other payer a different amount. Same as buying a vehicle.
don't you apply at Costco if the $10/hour you make at Walmart isn't enough, boy. Get off your ass and do something.
A vehicle is not emploiyment, so stop trying to make a false analogy and stick to the subject.
One business has determined that the minimum wage for that skill set is $18/hr, so why shouldn't that be the standard? Your'e the one who said that pay is commensurate to skill; and you have an $18/hr wage commensurate with retail skills that Walmart pays $10/hr.
So is $10/hr commensurate with the skill or is $18/hr?
At Walmart, those skills are worth $10/hour and at Costco, they're worth $18.
Why don't you deal with the fact that the pay disparity between Walmart and Costco for the same position and skill set completely undermines your argument that wage is determined by skill level?
Each decides its own.
How could that be because it's the same exact job?
Seems like you don't really understand your own argument.
That's why you can't put forth a coherent response.
YOU SAID someone's skill level is commensurate with their pay. Yet we have a situation where the disparity is so large, that principle cannot be relied upon.
Why is it that Costco pays $18/hr instead of $10/hr?
The concept is the same..
Walmart has determined it's worth $10.
You keep leaving out things such as those paying determining what that skill is worth because they pay. Walmart says $10. Costco says $18. Walmart says those skills are worth $10 and Costco says they're worth $18. Both are correct.