Look! Another witch!

SmarterthanYou said:
how fucking stupid can you be, you ignorant fuckstick. I could not possibly have been conned when I voted for gary johnson, dipshit. i bet you still think hillary was the most qualified EVER, don't you, dumbass?
Click to expand...

Yet you're here defending Trump.

Sounds fishy.
 
Rigby5 said:
Wrong.It is not at all required to register as a lobbyist if you are not doing it to make a living.
And a lobbyist is one who makes campaign contributions involving money, quid pro quo, etc.
If you are not offering money or services in return for money or services, you do not have to register, and in fact it is illegal to try to register the person.
Click to expand...

Prosecutors said that Butina was a Russian intelligence asset linked to the Kremlin and was preparing to flee the country.
 
CFM said:
I accomplished getting a troll like you to prove you're nothing but a fucking coward that hides behind his computer screen in Atlanta.
Click to expand...

You're the one who has to lie about himself on anonymous internet message boards, just to feel better emotionally.

You're a traitor.
 
LV426 said:
We've been through this already. The thread is plain for everyone to see.

You were losing an argument, so you invented a character biography for you message board character that kept changing from post-to-post, and you refuse to certify in any way any of the things you claimed about yourself. Claims that seemed to change depending on how your argument was faring.

You're just a fraud.
Click to expand...

So you say, but you can't cite an example.

:tardthoughts:
 
Dark Soul said:
So you say, but you can't cite an example.
Click to expand...

And now you resort to sea-lioning so you can escape culpability for being a fraud and liar.

But no matter...when this is all over you're going to re-invent yourself yet again, the third time in a decade, and cast yourself as a different character than the one you used to burn all your credibility.
 
LittleVagina426 said:
And now you resort to sea-lioning so you can escape culpability for being a fraud and liar.

But no matter...when this is all over you're going to re-invent yourself yet again, the third time in a decade, and cast yourself as a different character than the one you used to burn all your credibility.
Click to expand...

Interesting term. However, your theory is manufactured out of whole cloth. And you're a lousy tailor.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
what sounds fishy is you're assuming i'm defending someone because i'm questioning the law and it's use. but now you'll accuse me of my false patriotism again, blah blah blah.
Click to expand...

That's exactly what defending Trump is, dude.

So I don't know or care or believe if you voted for Gary Johnson. What I know is that you're here defending Trump while trying to lay the groundwork for your eventual disassociation and rebrand that always follows Conservative debacles.
 
Dark Soul said:
Interesting term. However, your theory is manufactured out of whole cloth. And you're a lousy tailor.
Click to expand...

Look, we already know that you have no problem lying about yourself from post-to-post, and that you can't even keep those lies straight.

So there's little reason to believe you won't try to rebrand after Trump so you don't have to accept responsibility for supporting him.

It's what you guys did after Bush, when you stapled teabags to your faces, and then you did it again in 2015 when you took the teabags off and put on red hats so you didn't have to be held to account for achieving nothing with the teabag power you got.

And you'll do it again once Trump is removed; you'll pretend you never supported him, you'll disassociate yourself from him, and you'll somehow try to blame him on the Democrats.

I see right through all of it. The psychology isn't that complex.
 
LV426 said:
That's exactly what defending Trump is, dude.

So I don't know or care or believe if you voted for Gary Johnson. What I know is that you're here defending Trump while trying to lay the groundwork for your eventual disassociation and rebrand that always follows Conservative debacles.
Click to expand...

so what you're saying here is that ANYONE at ANYTIME who questions ANY law is defending the current president of the united states?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
so what you're saying here is that ANYONE at ANYTIME who questions ANY law is defending the current president of the united states?
Click to expand...

You're not questioning a law; you're questioning the work investigators and prosecutors have done.

And you're doing that to defend Trump.
 
LV426 said:
You're not questioning a law; you're questioning the work investigators and prosecutors have done.

And you're doing that to defend Trump.
Click to expand...

you might want to go back and reread my original post then, because I ONLY questioned the law and it's use. anything after that, you're just being a whiny liberal idiot with TDS
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you might want to go back and reread my original post then, because I ONLY questioned the law and it's use. anything after that, you're just being a whiny liberal idiot with TDS
Click to expand...

The law and its use as it pertains to what?

To the indictments and investigation into Russia's attack on our democracy.

Even your arguments are lazy as fuck.
 
LV426 said:
The law and its use as it pertains to what?

To the indictments and investigation into Russia's attack on our democracy.

Even your arguments are lazy as fuck.
Click to expand...

what my actual question was 'are they using this law in the manner in which it was intended'? if ANYTHING, it might be construed as defending the woman being indicted, but anything AFTER that is a stretch of an imagination filled with hatred for trump. nothing else. even my lazy arguments beat the snot out of your illogical arguments.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
what my actual question was 'are they using this law in the manner in which it was intended'? if ANYTHING, it might be construed as defending the woman being indicted, but anything AFTER that is a stretch of an imagination filled with hatred for trump. nothing else. even my lazy arguments beat the snot out of your illogical arguments.
Click to expand...

What law? What law are you talking about? This is what I mean when I say you're lazy as fuck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top