It was paid for, moron. It still is.
Your Russia Tax Cut wasn't paid for.
Neither was your War on Terror.
Neither were your Bush Tax Cuts.
Neither was your Medicare Part-D.
None of that was paid for. Obamacare was.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Poll: Large majorities of Americans want to preserve Obamacare's consumer protections
- Thread starter blackascoal
- Start date
It was paid for, moron. It still is.
Your Russia Tax Cut wasn't paid for.
Neither was your War on Terror.
Neither were your Bush Tax Cuts.
Neither was your Medicare Part-D.
None of that was paid for. Obamacare was.
yea, but we have established you are a nut-bag, so
Nope. What we've established is that you are a fragile person who can't debate in good faith because you lack any moral character.
That's your opinion, and we've come to learn your opinion is worthless here.
And your opinion is that it does. The difference is I won't force mine on you but you want the government to mandate yours on everyone else.
As far as the worth, your opinion has less value than shit in a nigger's back yard. It's hard to tell the difference between the two if one is in his back yard. The color is virtually the same.
I explained how the Constitution can answer it.
No you didn't.
Explain how the Constitution improves your health care by privatizing the administration of payments for health care after the fact?
You won't be able to. Instead, you'll post a racist slur.
Since you hate the Constitution, you didn't understand the explanation.
You didn't offer an explanation. You just vomited up words, but you didn't connect them to a meaning or form a coherent argument.
What does the Constitution have to do with the profit motive tied to the administration of reimbursements to your provider?
NO IT DOESN'T! Not in the General Welfare clause in the preamble or in Article I.
Kill yourself.
The Constitution uses the word "Armies" and "Navy". If you can't read them, no one is surprised. It's not in ebonics.
If you were a man and that result of that is what you wanted, you'd try yourself. Since you've shown your claims of action are as meaningless as your existence, I have no fear of you doing so.
Military is a delegated power. It doesn't have to be incorrectly interpreted to be a power of Congress to address.
"Common Defense" isn't a broad power.
No you didn't.
Explain how the Constitution improves your health care by privatizing the administration of payments for health care after the fact?
You won't be able to. Instead, you'll post a racist slur.
I won't post a racial slur. You're just a motherfucking nigger. That's a fact, not a slur.
Not my fault you didn't understand the explanatio
You didn't give an explanation.
You just said "Constitution" and thought that was the explanation.
How is the Constitution the explanation?
What does the Constitution have to do with administrating reimbursements after care has been delivered?
Nothing. You're just shitting forth random words now because you know you have no good argument to make.
"Common Defense" isn't a broad power.
I didn't use common defense.
You didn't give an explanation.
You just said "Constitution" and thought that was the explanation.
How is the Constitution the explanation?
What does the Constitution have to do with administrating reimbursements after care has been delivered?
Nothing. You're just shitting forth random words now because you know you have no good argument to make.
Sorry, you can't read, boy. That's what happens when you're more concerned about how you can blame white people for your failures than learning to function in society.
I won't post a racial slur. You're just a motherfucking nigger. That's a fact, not a slur.
Wow, dude.
Sorry, you can't read, boy. That's what happens when you're more concerned about how you can blame white people for your failures than learning to function in society.
Now you're running away from your own attempt at an explanation.
How is "the Constitution" the explanation for why you think privatizing the administration of reimbursements to your doctor improves or enhances the care your doctor gives you before they are paid?
Wow, dude.
Dude? You must be 10 years old. More likely you have the cognitive ability of a 10 year old.
You shouldn't be surprised as someone telling you like it is. I suspect you get a lot of that. If not, you should.
Now you're running away from your own attempt at an explanation.
How is "the Constitution" the explanation for why you think privatizing the administration of reimbursements to your doctor improves or enhances the care your doctor gives you before they are paid?
Can't run away from something that was given.
I know your kind is slow but please do try to keep up. It's disheartening to see you fall further behind.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Americans want their health care dollars to go towards their health care - not making the rich richer.
Socialized health care = value.
For-profit health care = getting ripped off and ever rising prices.
Socialized health care = value.
For-profit health care = getting ripped off and ever rising prices.
Dude? You must be 10 years old. More likely you have the cognitive ability of a 10 year old.
You shouldn't be surprised as someone telling you like it is. I suspect you get a lot of that. If not, you should.
You're a racist, and the day will come where you slip up here and accidentally reveal a personal detail about yourself that will lead to your doxxing.
Then you'll lose your job because all these posts of yours -on company time, it seems- will be sent to your boss.
Then who will pay for your health care?
Can't run away from something that was given.
You can't articulate how "the Constitution" is the explanation for why you think tying a profit motive to the administration of payments to your doctor improves or enhances your care.
I think your brain just isn't developed enough to devise an explanation. Also, no explanation exists. You just shit forth "the Constitution" as a lazy, catch-all answer because you lack the cognitive abilities to make a coherent argument. Like, at all.
And you're resorting to stalling and hoping that at some point I just give up. But I'm not going to. You made the argument, so now it's on you to explain your position.
What does "the Constitution" have to do with improving or enhancing your health care by way of a profit motive tied to administration?
You'll never answer that question because you're deficient, and you fucking know it.
You're a racist, and the day will come where you slip up here and accidentally reveal a personal detail about yourself that will lead to your doxxing.
Then you'll lose your job because all these posts of yours -on company time, it seems- will be sent to your boss.
Then who will pay for your health care?
Still making claims with nothing to back them up, huh?
You can't articulate how "the Constitution" is the explanation for why you think tying a profit motive to the administration of payments to your doctor improves or enhances your care.
I think your brain just isn't developed enough to devise an explanation. Also, no explanation exists. You just shit forth "the Constitution" as a lazy, catch-all answer because you lack the cognitive abilities to make a coherent argument. Like, at all.
And you're resorting to stalling and hoping that at some point I just give up. But I'm not going to. You made the argument, so now it's on you to explain your position.
What does "the Constitution" have to do with improving or enhancing your health care by way of a profit motive tied to administration?
You'll never answer that question because you're deficient, and you fucking know it.
I don't think your brain can be developed enough to understand the one that has been given. A below average IQ isn't working well for you.