You mean like you pretending you're a man?
Poll: Large majorities of Americans want to preserve Obamacare's consumer protections
- Thread starter blackascoal
- Start date
You mean like you pretending you're a man?
You're a fucking racist right wing nut job......you are not fooling anyone.
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOO
You win the internet today.
I've been calling this mofo out as a fraud for years.
Make no mistake, he supports EVERYTHING THAT COMES FROM THE RACIST RIGHT.
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Remember when he was a libertarian...................LMAOOOOOOOOOOO
Oh and he didn't vote for dump......rolling my eyes.
He use to get away with this on the DCJ cause everyone believed him...........well except for me.
You can't stand up when you stick your nose up LV's ass, boy.
Irish Exit
Verified User
Republicans/conservatives aren't the ones who enacted a law that denied 5 million working poor people subsidies or medicaid so that people making well above the median income can get free birth control and mammograms. Your great democratic hero John McCain warned about this when he unsuccessfully tried to get Obama to put a brake on what was going to transpire.
TrippyHippy
free mind and open heart
Yep. If you're dying and want care but can't get it, you're a whiner.
Caring for the sick is far different from handing out houses and cars. What an ignorant response. Take a goddamn ethics class, you act like basic empathy and compassion is alien to you. You don't understand how being ambivalent to the health and well being of others just so you can save a little bit of tax money is gross. To you, it's just the same as handing out random ass luxury goods. Get your head out of your ass.
I can imagine you'd let small children slowly starve to death right in front of you while you look on eating a sandwich. After all, should car dealers just hand out cars to people? Why should you hand out your sandwich to people who didn't buy it? Lazy whiners.
The repub party is all about eliminating social programs that they disgustingly call entitlements. They want Social Security., Medicare, Medicaid, and other programs that help the poor and disabled in the economy, ended. They are all about helping the super wealthy get richer and more powerful. You can bet, they have their own vision of America and they are telling you what it is , if you are paying attentiion. It is a big change to a plutocracy run be the super rich who will dictate the new laws and regulations. They are gutting votiong and will do more and more to handle it.
Could Obamacare Lead to a Medical Marijuana Revolution?
Obamacare could offer a number of benefits to the medical marijuana industry, but presents an equally high number of challenges.
Sep 20, 2015
Whether you realize it or not, there's a revolution going on in the healthcare sector -- or two, to be more precise.
Two wildly different healthcare forces at work
On one end of the spectrum we have the Affordable Care Act, known better as Obamacare, which is in the process of transforming the way we purchase health insurance and receive medical care.
On the other end we have marijuana, a drug that it still illegal under federal law, which the American public and nearly half of all U.S. states have rallied around to some extent.
For the states, it's an added source of revenue that can fund everything from education to jobs.
BUT THE CARTELS HATE IT!
https://www.fool.com/personal-finan...acare-lead-to-a-medical-marijuana-revolu.aspx
CHALLENGES ACCOMPLISHED!!!!?
Obamacare could offer a number of benefits to the medical marijuana industry, but presents an equally high number of challenges.
Sep 20, 2015
Whether you realize it or not, there's a revolution going on in the healthcare sector -- or two, to be more precise.
Two wildly different healthcare forces at work
On one end of the spectrum we have the Affordable Care Act, known better as Obamacare, which is in the process of transforming the way we purchase health insurance and receive medical care.
On the other end we have marijuana, a drug that it still illegal under federal law, which the American public and nearly half of all U.S. states have rallied around to some extent.
For the states, it's an added source of revenue that can fund everything from education to jobs.
BUT THE CARTELS HATE IT!
https://www.fool.com/personal-finan...acare-lead-to-a-medical-marijuana-revolu.aspx
CHALLENGES ACCOMPLISHED!!!!?
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello anonymoose,
It's good to care about workers, but it is bad to show indifference to fellow US citizens. MILLIONS OF AMERICANS experienced new access to healthcare which simply was not available to them previously. The ACA is far from perfect, but it is a far cry better than what preceded it.
If your rates went up after the PPACA, how is that any different from what was happening prior?
Did you really think whatever rate you were paying was going to stay the same?
That caricature of liberal goals is nothing but propaganda, made-up by the shock-factor talking heads to get attention and sell advertising.
I think you meant 'lose.' Also, wealth and responsibility are not synonymous. Many on the dole would much prefer to have the self-esteem of a job they can live on. Since capitalism is not well regulated enough, and minimum wage is a poverty wage, many work at the min wage or near it at jobs which have no benefits and no guarantee of full time employment, but it is the only job they can find. Big corporations are only to happy to let the government pick up feeding their workers if they can get away with it.
If it doesn't matter to you; what are you complaining about? We see where your concerns are in this statement. You've made your indifference to the plight of the underadvantaged quite clear.
It's good to care about workers, but it is bad to show indifference to fellow US citizens. MILLIONS OF AMERICANS experienced new access to healthcare which simply was not available to them previously. The ACA is far from perfect, but it is a far cry better than what preceded it.
If your rates went up after the PPACA, how is that any different from what was happening prior?
Did you really think whatever rate you were paying was going to stay the same?
That caricature of liberal goals is nothing but propaganda, made-up by the shock-factor talking heads to get attention and sell advertising.
I think you meant 'lose.' Also, wealth and responsibility are not synonymous. Many on the dole would much prefer to have the self-esteem of a job they can live on. Since capitalism is not well regulated enough, and minimum wage is a poverty wage, many work at the min wage or near it at jobs which have no benefits and no guarantee of full time employment, but it is the only job they can find. Big corporations are only to happy to let the government pick up feeding their workers if they can get away with it.
If it doesn't matter to you; what are you complaining about? We see where your concerns are in this statement. You've made your indifference to the plight of the underadvantaged quite clear.
Irish Exit
Verified User
Your one-sided understanding of facts is duly noted.
"President Obama sparred with his 2008 presidential opponent Sen. John McCain at the health care summit, telling the Arizona Republican "we're not campaigning anymore. The election's over."
The president was responding to McCain's comments in which he complained that the health care bill was not produced in the open, but "behind closed doors."
McCain complained of "unsavory" dealmaking to get the bill passed in the Senate, including promises to give special deals to residents of Louisiana, Nebraska and Florida. (Some of those provisions were removed in Mr. Obama's plan released Monday.)
He pointed to a number of issues, including the PhRMA deal and a provision mandating $100 million for a Connecticut hospital, asking "why should that happen?"
At one point, Mr. Obama tried to interject. "Can I just finish, please," McCain said, cutting off the president.
"People are angry," McCain said. "We promised them change in Washington, and what we got was a process that you and I both said we would change."
He called on Democrats to "go back to the beginning" and "remove all the special deals for the special interests and the favored few," adding that he favors a system in which "geography does not dictate what kind of health care."
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-to-mccain-the-elections-over/
Yep. If you're dying and want care but can't get it, you're a whiner.
Caring for the sick is far different from handing out houses and cars. What an ignorant response. Take a goddamn ethics class, you act like basic empathy and compassion is alien to you. You don't understand how being ambivalent to the health and well being of others just so you can save a little bit of tax money is gross. To you, it's just the same as handing out random ass luxury goods. Get your head out of your ass.
I can imagine you'd let small children slowly starve to death right in front of you while you look on eating a sandwich. After all, should car dealers just hand out cars to people? Why should you hand out your sandwich to people who didn't buy it? Lazy whiners.
You're a whiner because you demand something be given to you that wasn't part of an agreement YOU made.
The only difference is the specific example. ALL of them involve a situation where someone isn't paying for what they want but expecting it to be given to them because they WANT it.
Strange how bleeding hearts like you talk about compassion and empathy yet your entire argument centers around some other entity providing someone something for which an agreement didn't include those items. How about you find all of those you think deserve something they don't have and purchase it for them with YOUR money. As far as ethics is concerned, what you're trying convince me to support is what you believe about someone being provided with something they didn't pay for. What's gross is that you think SOMEONE ELSE should pay more in taxes while your refuse to personally do for those for which you claim to care. BTW, housing isn't a luxury. By definition, it's a need. Perhaps you should take a basic Economics class.
I shouldn't hand out my sandwich to someone that didn't pay for it. If it's my kids, rest assured they will eat because they're MY responsibility. If it's someone else's kids, those kids are the responsibility of the ones that produced them. Remember, the choice to have them was made by the one that says what she does with her body is her choice. From that moment on, the one making the choice has relieved the rest of us from any responsibility. What that means, despite you wanting me to have a responsibility for a choice I didn't make, is that no accountability exists. You can't be held accountable for not doing something for which you don't have a responsibility to do.
That wasn't what the use of the Constitution as an explanation was trying to do. Please keep up.
The flaws have been shown. You refuse to accept them because you're jealous.
I offer a source and you provide some dumb bitch and four-eyed faggot in a commercial type setting. I'll go with a source. You stick with those two dumbasses.