Why I don’t believe Fords story

[USFREEDOM911]

She was sexually assaulted by a perverted, entitled, rich brat and his homoerotic buddy.

Proved it, you race-baiting lying cunt!

 

[USFREEDOM911]

The FBI investigated the Catholic priests who molested kids over a period longer than that.

You're saying that investigation was illegitimate too?

Why do you want to protect priests who touch kids?

Why are you so pro-sexual assault?

Now you're trying to compare apples to oranges and failing, as usual.

Why are you a race-baiting racist?

 

[LV426]

How can she be "trapped", if she's telling the "truth".

Because they'll smear her character.

That's the trap.

But what I don't understand is why the rush to get Brettany on the bench?

 

[LV426]

Proved it, you race-baiting lying cunt!

She passed a lie detector.

Your guy refuses to take one.

Pretty obvious why.

 

[LV426]

Now you're trying to compare apples to oranges and failing

How so?

Teenagers were sexually assaulted by Catholic priests 40 years ago, the FBI investigates. According to you, it's not necessary to investigate that because it happened 40 years ago.

But you're saying these are apples-to-oranges, but how? In both cases, the victims were teenagers; in both cases, the incidents happened 40 years ago. Yet you say these aren't similar? How so? Both involve teenage victims of sexual assault 40 years ago.

So you don't think the victims of Catholic priests were really victims, do you? It's OK to admit that you don't.

 

[Eagle_Eye]

What 'same bull and how many times' are you referring to. Your post reeks of desperation.

Does the names Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas ring a bell?

How about Herman Cain?


Those are two right off the top of my head, and there were others. So now which side appears desperate?

 

[LV426]

Does the names Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas ring a bell?

The FBI investigated the incidents prior to Hill testifying.

So why not do the same today?

Thomas was eventually confirmed, so what are you so worried about?

It's because you need Bretty on the bench to protect your guys from the inevitable conclusions of Mueller's investigation.

You guys aren't very subtle with your intentions.

 

[jimmymccready]

She passed a polygraph, guys. That's the REAL story.

 

[jimmymccready]

The Trump base and far right are desperate as the investigations close in.

 

[Eagle_Eye]

The FBI investigated the incidents prior to Hill testifying.

So why not do the same today?

Thomas was eventually confirmed, so what are you so worried about?

It's because you need Bretty on the bench to protect your guys from the inevitable conclusions of Mueller's investigation.

You guys aren't very subtle with your intentions.

If I'm not mistaken Anita Hill showed up when Justice Thomas was nominated not when the Senate was close to a conformation vote that's why.

It is such a clear delaying tactic it's laughable. Plus her story is so full of holes it can't be patched.

 

[LV426]

If I'm not mistaken Anita Hill showed up when Justice Thomas was nominated not when the Senate was close to a conformation vote that's why.

LOL!

Hill showed up after the FBI investigated the allegations.

Check your timeline, bud.

 

[Joe Capitalist]

The "reason" you do not "believe" her story, Asshole...

...is because you do not want to do anything you think your Dear Leader would prefer that you don't.

You are a tool of Donald Trump and his degenerate agenda.

Did you really suppose anyone but one of the people like you, devotees of the abomination, would buy into this absurd rationalization nonsense of yours?

C'mon. You have got to be smarter than that.

He voted for Trump. Thus, he doesn't.

Another reason why Trump loves the poorly educated.

 

[LV426]

It is such a clear delaying tactic it's laughable. Plus her story is so full of holes it can't be patched.

It's funny how Conservatives want to push through Bretty without doing their own due diligence on him.

It's because you're desperate to get someone in there who will protect Trump and the GOP from the inevitable conclusions of Mueller's investigation, isn't it? It's OK. You can be honest about that.

 

[TOP]

if she's telling the truth, be there Monday. Nothing to hide....

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

if she's telling the truth, be there Monday. Nothing to hide....

Do you think it's that easy for an alleged victim who was extremely reluctant to even report this to begin with?

No emotional or life considerations there? From what I heard, her family already had to move.

 

[Joe Capitalist]

Here is why I don’t believe her

1) She claims she didn’t want this to come out yet SHE reached out to a democrat AND the Washington Post. Nobody who wants to stay anonymous does that

2) She claims she wants to be anonymous yet in August she hires a lawyer. Why? If she never planned on it going public why did she hire a lawyer?

3) She claims she wanted to be anonymous and not go public yet she supposedly took a lie detector test. Why? Who does that?


And who is paying her legal fees?

All questions I hope she will be asked on Monday

Also, this gambit of her erasing her online profile is likely to blow up on her. Rest assured that people are looking right now and when they find derogatory posts of hers going back 8 years. She is sunk

The burden of proof is on her

Do you believe Trump said "I grab them by the pussy" in the Access Hollywood tape?

Do you believe Trump bragged on the Howard Stern radio show that he peeks into the women's dressing room during his Miss America Pageant?

Do you believe Trump ridiculed the disabled when he mocked a disabled journalist.

Do you believe Trump fucked porn star Stormy Daniels during Melanoma's pregnancy?

Do you believe Trump disrespected a Viet Nam war veteran and former POW?

 

[Irish]

Maybe they should subpoena her bank accounts and see if she's being "paid", for all this.

Yes. But that would require DOJ/FBI doing something against a lib/dem. IE unheard of.

 

[Eagle_Eye]

LOL!

Hill showed up after the FBI investigated the allegations.

Check your timeline, bud.

Who initiated the charges that the FBI investigated? Do I hear Anita Hill? Or does the FBI routinely investigate Supreme Court nominees for sexual harassment? Your reaching sport.

 

[Mason Michaels]

If I'm not mistaken Anita Hill showed up when Justice Thomas was nominated not when the Senate was close to a conformation vote that's why.

It is such a clear delaying tactic it's laughable. Plus her story is so full of holes it can't be patched.

You weren't there,if it was a Democrat,you would say the opposite.

 

[Eagle_Eye]

It's funny how Conservatives want to push through Bretty without doing their own due diligence on him.

It's because you're desperate to get someone in there who will protect Trump and the GOP from the inevitable conclusions of Mueller's investigation, isn't it? It's OK. You can be honest about that.

Funny how you want to delay the conformation until after the mid term elections. Hoping you will win God you people are so fucking transparent.