Why I don’t believe Fords story

[sear]

Learn how to use the quote feature, you dumb $#@!.

You assume I don't out of ignorance. Clearly you're not intelligent enough to understand there's a more logical reason.

Yet you, the mentally deficient one, accuse me, your intellectual superior, call me a " dumb $#@!. " If I am that, what does that make you?

PS U9
If you can name on other reason I don't use quote as you wish, I'll consider tendering to you an apology. I genuinely don't believe you're smart enough. Evidently not.

 

[signalmankenneth]

 

[USFREEDOM911]

You assume I don't out of ignorance. Clearly you're not intelligent enough to understand there's a more logical reason.

Yet you, the mentally deficient one, accuse me, your intellectual superior, call me a " dumb $#@!. " If I am that, what does that make you?

PS U9
If you can name on other reason I don't use quote as you wish, I'll consider tendering to you an apology. I genuinely don't believe you're smart enough. Evidently not.

It is either ignorance or just stupid laziness.

Either way; if you want responses, then learn how to use it.

And why would I call you a " dumb $#@!. ", seeing as how I don't use such phrases?

The only other reason could be a overblown sense of entitlement and you expect other posters to scroll back to whatever it is, that has caught your attention.

 

[Micawber]

Here is why I don’t believe her

1) I am a disgusting vile deplorable who prays to Jebus the rapist gets away with this so I can declare victory for my foul nationwide team of backward illiterate dirtbag asshole misogynistic old farts

I fixed some minor misspellings and word choices but kept your meaning intact for you!

 

[kudzu]

Deborah Ramirez alleges Kavanaugh had ‘exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent’ - New Yorker


https://www.newyorker.com/news/news...rett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez

 

[sear]

" if you want responses " U9 #483

Please don't trouble yourself.
No objection to responses, only not from whiners.

I prefer debates over substance to whining over format.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Please don't trouble yourself.
No objection to responses, only not from whiners.

I prefer debates over substance to whining over format.

And you've shown that you're still to stupid to use the quote feature properly.

 

[rjhenn]

Personally I don't believe a lame duck president Republican or Democrat should pick a SCOTUS justice in their last year in office. Sorry different circumstances. But your whining was noted.

Not really all that different. The GOP was desperate to push Kavanaugh through before the midterms because they were afraid that they wouldn't have the votes after the midterms. Now they may have increased the chances that they won't have the votes.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Not really all that different. The GOP was desperate to push Kavanaugh through before the midterms because they were afraid that they wouldn't have the votes after the midterms. Now they may have increased the chances that they won't have the votes.

 

[Eagle_Eye]

Not really all that different. The GOP was desperate to push Kavanaugh through before the midterms because they were afraid that they wouldn't have the votes after the midterms. Now they may have increased the chances that they won't have the votes.

Oh but I believe just the opposite will happen now with all the nastiness and pettiness the Democrats showed during the conformation. Any bets the GOP picks up seats in the Senate and possibly House?