Rosenstein
- Thread starter Darth Omar
- Start date
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Jeff Sessions is secretly a liberal
LOL
LOL
I wouldn't doubt if the NYT made THIS one up, too......just trying to bait Trump to fire Weasel sooner than later.
countryboy
Verified User
Stop projecting. That'd be you who should shoot yourself in the head. But we know libs are scared of guns, so, just pound an ice pick into your left eye with a ball peen hammer. That should do the trick.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Sessions was an opponent of legal and illegal immigration during his time in Congress.[195][196] He opposed the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007 and the bi-partisan Gang of Eight's Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013. He said that a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants undermines the rule of law, that the inflow of guest workers and immigrants depresses wages and raises unemployment for United States citizens, and that current immigration policy expands an underclass dependent on the welfare state. In a May 2006 floor speech, he said, "Fundamentally, almost no one coming from the Dominican Republic to the United States is coming because they have a skill that would benefit us and that would indicate their likely success in our society."[197][198] He is a supporter of E-Verify, the federal database that allows businesses to electronically verify the immigration status of potential new hires,[199] and has advocated for expanded construction of a Southern border fence.[200] In 2013, Sessions said that an opt-out provision in immigration legislation before Congress would allow Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano to avoid building a border fence. PolitiFact called Session's statement "False", stating that the provision would allow Napolitano to determine where the fence was built, but not opt out of building it entirely.[201]
Sessions's Senate website expressed his view that there is a "clear nexus between immigration and terrorism" and that "Plainly, there is no way to vet these refugees" who would immigrate to the U.S. from Syria in 2016 or who came to the U.S. after September 11, 2001 and were alleged to be involved in terrorism. The news release said that "the absence of derogatory information in our systems about an individual does not mean that admitting that individual carries no risk".[202][203] Sessions has expressed the view that the children of immigrants from Muslim-majority countries are "susceptible to the toxic radicalization of terrorist organizations" on the basis of the Orlando and San Bernardino Attacks.[204][205] Sessions supported establishing safe zones as an alternative to immigration from war-torn countries.[206][207]
Breitbart News executive chairman Steve Bannon talked about Jeff Sessions as the leader of the movement for slowing down both legal and illegal immigration before Donald Trump came to the scene, considering his work to kill immigration reform as akin "to the civil rights movement of 1960". Sessions and his communications director Stephen Miller developed what Miller describes as "nation-state populism" as a response to globalization and immigration.[208]
Immigration is the issue that brought Sessions and Trump together.[209] Trump has credited Sessions as an influential advisor on immigration.[210][211] After Trump was elected and announced Sessions as his Attorney General nominee, Cato Institute immigration analyst Alex Nowrasteh observed "It's almost as if Sessions wrote Trump's immigration platform."[212]
On June 18, a group of more than 600 United Methodist Church clergy and laity announced that they were bringing church law charges against Sessions. The members of the group accused him of "child abuse, immorality, racial discrimination and dissemination of doctrines contrary to the standards of the doctrine of the United Methodist Church."[213] The last charge refers to Sessions' "misuse" of Romans 13, which he quoted to argue that secular law must always be obeyed.[214]
According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), a woman and her child fled domestic abuse in El Salvador to seek asylum in the U.S. However the mother was removed from her detention facility and likely put on a plane on August 9, 2018, despite Justice Department promises that she and others would not be deported before the judge could rule on their cases. Judge Emmet G. Sullivan demanded, “Turn that plane around.” He threatened to hold those responsible for the removal in contempt of court, starting with Sessions, if the situation was not rectified. A Department of Homeland Security official stated, "We are complying with the court's requests ... the plaintiffs will not disembark and will be promptly returned to the United States." An ACLU suit challenged a recent decision by Sessions to make it nearly impossible for victims of domestic violence and gangs to qualify for asylum in the U.S. The lawsuit claims the woman and her young daughter came to the U.S. from El Salvador after twenty years of spousal abuse and her receiving death threats from a violent gang."[215]
Sessions's Senate website expressed his view that there is a "clear nexus between immigration and terrorism" and that "Plainly, there is no way to vet these refugees" who would immigrate to the U.S. from Syria in 2016 or who came to the U.S. after September 11, 2001 and were alleged to be involved in terrorism. The news release said that "the absence of derogatory information in our systems about an individual does not mean that admitting that individual carries no risk".[202][203] Sessions has expressed the view that the children of immigrants from Muslim-majority countries are "susceptible to the toxic radicalization of terrorist organizations" on the basis of the Orlando and San Bernardino Attacks.[204][205] Sessions supported establishing safe zones as an alternative to immigration from war-torn countries.[206][207]
Breitbart News executive chairman Steve Bannon talked about Jeff Sessions as the leader of the movement for slowing down both legal and illegal immigration before Donald Trump came to the scene, considering his work to kill immigration reform as akin "to the civil rights movement of 1960". Sessions and his communications director Stephen Miller developed what Miller describes as "nation-state populism" as a response to globalization and immigration.[208]
Immigration is the issue that brought Sessions and Trump together.[209] Trump has credited Sessions as an influential advisor on immigration.[210][211] After Trump was elected and announced Sessions as his Attorney General nominee, Cato Institute immigration analyst Alex Nowrasteh observed "It's almost as if Sessions wrote Trump's immigration platform."[212]
On June 18, a group of more than 600 United Methodist Church clergy and laity announced that they were bringing church law charges against Sessions. The members of the group accused him of "child abuse, immorality, racial discrimination and dissemination of doctrines contrary to the standards of the doctrine of the United Methodist Church."[213] The last charge refers to Sessions' "misuse" of Romans 13, which he quoted to argue that secular law must always be obeyed.[214]
According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), a woman and her child fled domestic abuse in El Salvador to seek asylum in the U.S. However the mother was removed from her detention facility and likely put on a plane on August 9, 2018, despite Justice Department promises that she and others would not be deported before the judge could rule on their cases. Judge Emmet G. Sullivan demanded, “Turn that plane around.” He threatened to hold those responsible for the removal in contempt of court, starting with Sessions, if the situation was not rectified. A Department of Homeland Security official stated, "We are complying with the court's requests ... the plaintiffs will not disembark and will be promptly returned to the United States." An ACLU suit challenged a recent decision by Sessions to make it nearly impossible for victims of domestic violence and gangs to qualify for asylum in the U.S. The lawsuit claims the woman and her young daughter came to the U.S. from El Salvador after twenty years of spousal abuse and her receiving death threats from a violent gang."[215]
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Trump can fire him when Congress is out of session, then appoint an acting deputy AG to oversee Mullet.
If democrats want to turn the confirmation hearing on the acting deputy’s replacement into a circus, it won’t matter.
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
Report me for advocating for the suicide of federal officials, genius.
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
I owned sporting firearms before you were born, Einstein.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
I don’t care what terms are used for it.
It’s apparent that Rosenstein either intended to wear a wire or he was making a joke about wearing one. How many city blocks would have gone up in flames had that happened under Obama lol?
In either event, his conversation was leaked and now Trump can justifiably fire Rosenstein. The interesting issue was the motivation behind the leak. People don’t leak for giggles—there’s always a point to it.
Was it to give Trump political cover in firing Rosenstein? That’s actually funny lol. We can rule that out, I think.
The most plausible objective was to bait Trump into firing Rosenstein. Why does it seem like someone [or some people] might be getting desperate?
Whatever term you want to use for them is fine. Does the term ‘sedition’ mean anything to you?
Last edited:
floridafan
Verified User
Have you considered the fact that this incident never actually happened?
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Then I would be pissed if I was Rosenstein.
Why would someone make it up and then leak about it?
floridafan
Verified User
Cant answer that but there is a real possibility that it never happened. Lets sit back and wait till all the facts are available.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
You never seem to lack for imagination when it comes to Trump and Putin lol.
Play along, why would someone leak that about Rosenstein?
floridafan
Verified User
Already answered that. Why are you so anxious to get rid of Rosenstein?
Darth Omar
Russian asset
I’m actually giving Rod the benefit of the doubt.
Maybe he’s been set up, I don’t know. But why? Why would someone give Trump an opportunity to fire him and jeapordize the Mullet investigation?
floridafan
Verified User
Is this what you call giving someone the benefit of the doubt:
"Trump can fire him when Congress is out of session, then appoint an acting deputy AG to oversee Mullet"
Darth Omar
Russian asset
floridafan
Verified User
Your point is that you want to get rid of Rosenstein as quickly as possible. The noose must be getting too tight.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
And you wanted rid of Trump yesterday lol. You can’t get rid of him fast enough.
Take a stab at the question.
Tranquillus in Exile
New member
Yes! The Sedition Act was passed by Congress and signed into law in 1918. It criminalized "speech that cast the government in a negative light", with penalties of up to 20 years.
The sky would be the limit for Trump with a law like that! Provided the Supreme Court upheld it, which it did in 1919.