Rosenstein

Tranquillus in Exile said:
Yes! The Sedition Act was passed by Congress and signed into law in 1918. It criminalized "speech that cast the government in a negative light", with penalties of up to 20 years.

The sky would be the limit for Trump with a law like that! Provided the Supreme Court upheld it, which it did in 1919.
Click to expand...

My bad lol.

Wrong word. Can you think of a more fitting term?
 
Darth Omar said:
I don’t care what terms are used for it.

It’s apparent that Rosenstein either intended to wear a wire or he was making a joke about wearing one. How many city blocks would have gone up in flames had that happened under Obama lol?

In either event, his conversation was leaked and now Trump can justifiably fire Rosenstein. The interesting issue was the motivation behind the leak. People don’t leak for giggles—there’s always a point to it.

Was it to give Trump political cover in firing Rosenstein? That’s actually funny lol. We can rule that out, I think.

The most plausible objective was to bait Trump into firing Rosenstein. Why does it seem like someone [or some people] might be getting desperate?

Whatever term you want to use for them is fine. Does the term ‘sedition’ mean anything to you?
Click to expand...
yes. leaks are so fast it must be an insider ( if we are not using term deep state) coordination.

Rosenweasel is like a cancer - Trump needs to fire him but watch the timing
 
anatta said:
yes. leaks are so fast it must be an insider ( if we are not using term deep state) coordination.

Rosenweasel is like a cancer - Trump needs to fire him but watch the timing
Click to expand...

Use DS all you want lol.

I only refrain from it because they use it to deflect from the issue. Rosenstein will be replaced—not if but when. I just think it’s interesting he’s become a pawn all of a sudden.

The critters aren’t even safe from one another.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top