The Smearing Of Brett Kavanaugh Is Truly Evil

plus he doesn't need to be charged with anything to be investigated by the FBI like any other suspect nominee for whatever job

You don't have to be charged with a fucking thing to get subpoenaed, you syphilitic cock sore.

Jesus Trumpers are stupid

:lolup:Three morons who think we live in a Fascist nation where people can be dragged before a court for any reason they want. :rofl2:

This is proof the loony, lying repugnant left has totally lost it in the Trump era. :rofl2:

giphy.gif
 
:lolup:Three morons who think we live in a Fascist nation where people can be dragged before a court for any reason they want. :rofl2:

This is proof the loony, lying repugnant left has totally lost it in the Trump era. :rofl2:

giphy.gif

nope, FBI investigations are quite common, especially for a SCOTUS seat

what country do you hail from?
 
Maybe Brett Kavanaugh is a gang-raping attempted murderer who managed to live a public life of acclaim and honor. Maybe the devotion to his wife and two daughters, his respect for countless women and their careers, and his wisdom on the bench are parts of an elaborate plot to get away with it. Anything is possible.

But the idea that the country should convict him and destroy his life with no evidence other than recovered and uncorroborated memories and creepy porn lawyer Michael Avenatti’s say-so is quite insane.

President Donald Trump, who was elected by people who cared deeply about fighting the progressive takeover of the courts, nominated Brett Kavanaugh to fill Anthony Kennedy’s seat. D.C. establishment figures on the right revere Kavanaugh, and praise his extensive judicial record. Before meeting with him or holding hearings, most Democratic senators said they planned to vote against him.

The hearings ricocheted from interesting discussions of judicial philosophy to clownish “I am Spartacus” moments and radical abortion protesters screaming about their love of killing unborn children.

Only upon completion did Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein release news that she’d sat on a claim of sexual assault for six weeks. The media then began running with uncorroborated and disputed allegations ranging from Christine Blasey Ford saying she thought Kavanaugh was trying to rape her and might kill her to Avenatti suggesting that Kavanaugh is a gang raper.

Republicans on the Judiciary Committee — in part thanks to Sen. Jeff Flake, cowering in the face of a smear campaign — bent over backwards to accommodate the first accuser, no matter how outlandish her requests to delay the hearing. As was easily predictable, the media and other resistance members put forth additional claims — somehow even less substantiated than the initial one — as the days passed.

Kavanaugh isn’t facing criminal prosecution in part because his accusers have come nowhere near the standard required for criminal prosecution.
And senators predisposed to vote against him are not the definition of an impartial jury.
That does not mean disputed allegations should form the basis of destroying a man’s life, career, and reputation. It also does not mean that a precedent should be established of allowing the left to weaponize use of disputed allegations to thwart the seating of justices.

some in the media are running multiple stories based on reputation-destroying allegations that have not come close to meeting a journalistic standard.

The New Yorker’s laughably disreputable Jane Mayer and previously well-regarded Ronan Farrow wrote up a story claiming that a progressive activist recovered a memory of sexual assault only after being prodded by Senate Democrats to do so.
Even The New York Times — which doesn’t have a sterling track record when it comes to running with wild accusations — interviewed dozens of people in an attempt to corroborate the allegation and was not able to do so. They found that the accuser Deborah Ramirez had recently told classmates she could not be certain Kavanaugh was the man who she says exposed himself to her.

Are Our Senators All Children?

Democratic senators announced at the outset of the Kavanaugh nomination that they would do what it took to stop him. They have held to their word, believing that any means necessary is morally defensible.

Republican senators, however, seem to lack the discernment to understand when they’re getting played by people who hate them and want them destroyed.

It’s not just that they’re losing a political battle, but that they’re allowing Democrats and the media to destroy a man and his family for political gain. There is no virtue in allowing a man to be smeared without evidence.

At some point one must consider whether evil means are justified for progressive ends. The bottom line is that this media-enabled Democratic smear campaign simply can’t be the standard by which we destroy people. Watching this miscarriage of justice is radicalizing those who care about rule of law and political processes that have a semblance of sanity.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/09/24/the-smear-campaign-against-brett-kavanaugh-is-truly-evil/

This isn't about convicting him, much less "destroying his life." It's about whether he should get a big promotion, to a life-time appointment on the highest court. There's nothing wrong with vetting accusations against him as part of the process of deciding whether that promotion is a good idea. At this point, two women have come out and made sexual assault allegations against him. Predictably, many of the same right-wing outlets that gleefully ran with every half-baked bit of hearsay about Bill Clinton's sex life, now think we should treat it as inappropriate to look into such matters when it's one of their boys.
 
This isn't about convicting him, much less "destroying his life." It's about whether he should get a big promotion, to a life-time appointment on the highest court. There's nothing wrong with vetting accusations against him as part of the process of deciding whether that promotion is a good idea. At this point, two women have come out and made sexual assault allegations against him. Predictably, many of the same right-wing outlets that gleefully ran with every half-baked bit of hearsay about Bill Clinton's sex life, now think we should treat it as inappropriate to look into such matters when it's one of their boys.

There’s no comparison between Clinton and Kavanaugh.
 
This isn't about convicting him, much less "destroying his life." It's about whether he should get a big promotion, to a life-time appointment on the highest court. There's nothing wrong with vetting accusations against him as part of the process of deciding whether that promotion is a good idea. At this point, two women have come out and made sexual assault allegations against him. Predictably, many of the same right-wing outlets that gleefully ran with every half-baked bit of hearsay about Bill Clinton's sex life, now think we should treat it as inappropriate to look into such matters when it's one of their boys.

Clinton had a pattern that showed when POTUS ( although I never supported impeachment)
Judge K has an exemplary background; both professional and personal.
65 women friends -many of them life long came forward to vouch for his character.
Compare that to one -maybe 2 - who have recollections without details, but still know it's him.

But in the interest of vetting -yes get Dr.Ford's testimony. Then move on and vote
 
This isn't about convicting him, much less "destroying his life." It's about whether he should get a big promotion, to a life-time appointment on the highest court. There's nothing wrong with vetting accusations against him as part of the process of deciding whether that promotion is a good idea. At this point, two women have come out and made sexual assault allegations against him. Predictably, many of the same right-wing outlets that gleefully ran with every half-baked bit of hearsay about Bill Clinton's sex life, now think we should treat it as inappropriate to look into such matters when it's one of their boys.

What a laughably stupid and moronic post. He's been convicted in the court of public opinion by the media, leftist partisan hacks making false allegations and the Democratic Party of the Jackass.

Your post suggests a pathological lying dumbfuck or someone so painfully ignorant of what is happening as to defy common sense.

The only thing more laughable is this loony pretense that you know what you are erupting about and have intelligence. Nothing could be further removed from reality or the truth. :rofl2:
 
You admit that you have no idea of whether or not Kavanaugh is guilty, yet from day 1 you defended everything he has to say. Well, lets wait till tomorrow, Michael Avenatti has a number of people who will be coming forward.

I have a pretty good idea Kavanaugh is not guilty.

Tigers don’t change their stripes. He’s a demonstrably upstanding man with a stable family and a long unblemished career; plenty of male and female associates that have testified to his character. Oh, and he’s survived six FBI investigations.

What do we know about the accusers? Very little by comparison. Even Ford deleted her social media.

Kind of easy, actually.
 
I have a pretty good idea Kavanaugh is not guilty.

Tigers don’t change their stripes. He a demonstrably upstanding man with a stable family and a long unblemished career; plenty of male and female associates that have testified to his character. Oh, and he’s survived six FBI investigations.

What do we know about the accusers? Very little by comparison. Even Ford deleted her social media.

Kind of easy, actually.

We could have said the same as the bolded about Cosby before the 1st allegations surfaced.

Not that it means he's guilty - but it's not a good point. I really don't know w/ Kav right now, either way.
 
There’s no comparison between Clinton and Kavanaugh.

Agreed. Although Clinton at least allegedly exposed himself to Jones, even she doesn't claim he shoved it in her face the way Kavanaugh's accuser says he did to her. And although Clinton was accused of a sexual assault by Broaddrick, she also swore under oath that it never happened, whereas we have no such denial from Ford when it comes to her claim that he tried to rape her.
 
What a laughably stupid and moronic post. He's been convicted in the court of public opinion by the media, leftist partisan hacks making false allegations and the Democratic Party of the Jackass.

No. He's been accused. Some people think he did it. Some think his accuser is lying. Now we get testimony and see who seems more credible. Why this has driven conservatives into hysterics is beyond me. Take a breath. People on the right are just so emotional.
 
Clinton had a pattern that showed when POTUS

Agreed. Throughout his presidency, he fought hard for women's issues. Kavanaugh, by comparison, is famously the biggest threat to women's control over their own bodies when it comes to abortion, and possibly even contraception. We can tell a lot about what each man thinks about a woman's right to have a say in the uses of her body by the way they did their respective jobs.

65 women friends -many of them life long came forward to vouch for his character.

At least one of those is now outraged to find out that Kavanaugh was listing himself as an "alumnus" of her in his yearbook, as part of a sick pattern of bragging by his crowd about their supposed sexual conquests. It really tells you something about the man that even when he tried to hand-pick a list of women he'd not treated badly, he still managed to pick one he'd treated badly. Don't you think? I would have expected that ANY man, no matter how screwed up, could come up with a list of women he hadn't badly disrespected, without accidentally including one he had.
 
No. He's been accused. Some people think he did it. Some think his accuser is lying. Now we get testimony and see who seems more credible. Why this has driven conservatives into hysterics is beyond me. Take a breath. People on the right are just so emotional.

Ford is taking her good old time, assuming she actually shows up.

What’s that all about?
 
No. He's been accused. Some people think he did it. Some think his accuser is lying. Now we get testimony and see who seems more credible. Why this has driven conservatives into hysterics is beyond me. Take a breath. People on the right are just so emotional.

There you go pretending that this laughably weak claim is something it is not. That is the dishonest lunatic mental state liberals seem to wallow in these days. Why the pretense? We all know what this is. Why pretend it is anything else.

FACTS: (1) the woman never filed a formal complaint....for 35 years; (2) She can't remember the exact date; (3) She can't remember the address or location where this occurred; (4) She can't rem,ember who was actually at this party; (5) She can't remember the year it occurred; (6) Christine Blasey Ford's own classmate who Ford said was an eyewitness denies any knowledge of what Ford claims; (7) Ford never thought it important enough to come forward when Kavanaugh was nominated to serve on the Federal bench, why?; and (8) The letter remained anonymous and never reported to the Chair of the Senate Judiciary committee nor anyone on the board. It was secretly leaked to the media.

I know you are a dishonest partisan hack so you can't comprehend the truth in all this; but most with the intelligence of a gnat can see right through this scam and smear campaign.

A good man and his family are now being dragged through the mud and liberal asshats on the left are laughing and gleeful because they wanted to see payback. The Democratic Party of the Jackass are engaging in this tactic of smearing an accomplished law abiding family man because they are desperate and can't win elections.

That's the truth. Everything else is illustrative of a little girl throwing a temper tantrum in the store for not getting what she wants.
 
We could have said the same as the bolded about Cosby before the 1st allegations surfaced.

Not that it means he's guilty - but it's not a good point. I really don't know w/ Kav right now, either way.

There is NOTHING that can be remotely compared with between Cosby and Kavanaugh you dishonest dunce. NOTHING. Attempting to do so is merely more evidence of the growing lunacy of the left and partisan hacks who think it is fun to ruin a man's 35 year reputation over nothing more than "because she said so."
 
Back
Top