Funny, since Bart was Ken Starr's designated leaker don't you think?
That is a lie. But you are a pretentious douchebag with a low IQ and are prone to bloviate complete nonsense and moronic talking points.
Funny, since Bart was Ken Starr's designated leaker don't you think?
This is ALL on the Democratic Party of the Jackass. Let's hope there will be a serious price to pay in the Fall and beyond. If not, good men and women might as well throw in the towel.
Run, run, run from a routine FBI investigtion.
That is a lie. But you are a pretentious douchebag with a low IQ and are prone to bloviate complete nonsense and moronic talking points.
Another lie from the pretentious douchebag. The FBI doesn't investigate local crimes. A crime has never been charged in this instance and FBI background checks do not come to conclusions.
Therefore, you're not merely a pretentious douchebag, but a low IQ one at best.
America got slapped with reality and couldn't handle it. Again.
So you honestly believe that cock and bull story Ford put out despite the fact she has not one shred of evidence Kavanaugh did it. I watched her testimony and she is a very confused emotional cripple who really doesn't know if the event even happened. Hell even her "so called" witnesses couldn't confirm her story. I honestly feel sorry for the woman as you lefties are shamelessly using her as a pawn in a game of politics. If I were a Democrat (which I was at one time) I would resign the party after this.
That's how we got Bart, they already have. Supporting the role of dark money, gerrymandering and voter suppression is still too much for some.
No, it's fact and people know, you can't out lie that.
The entire world witnessed it for themselves, FBI routinely investigates senate approved positions..
She said what any officer of the law would. Ford should run down to the nearest police department and file her charges immediately. Then, maybe, someone can slap her with reality or we can presume there is some seriousness to her spurious claims. Meanwhile, here is your award for being the biggest, most pretentious, unintelligent douche on the forum:
![]()
They didn't know Kavanugh.
Ford wasn't even in his circle of friends
What do you think Kavanaugh believes the Democrats should have done
in the face of serious allegations of sexual misconduct There was nothing "serious" about these claims.
a highly credible woman who was willing to testify in front of Congress about it? There was NOTHING credible about Ford.
She has a history of drunkenness
psychological issues
and the people she claims were there stated in no uncertain terms they weren't there making her a liar of the highest order.
conspired with Kavanaugh to keep it quiet There is a process to protect the accuser and the accused. The Democrats weren't interested in that. They wanted a media circus in an attempt to destroy a man who has had an exemplary career.
he's decided not to be upset with her about that What do you know about what he's decided you lying hack?
So what if it happened?
It wasn't Kavanaugh.
How does he get his life back? His reputation he worked so hard to establish? His character has been forever tarnished over what if? STFU you moron.
drunken psychotic trollop
that she waited....NOT 10, NOT 15, NOT 20, NOT 25 but THIRTY-FIVE years and ONLY, after he was nominated for the Supreme Court.
What makes you think that?
Do you only know people who are in your circle of friends? Assuming the answer is no, wouldn't you do better to stick to relevant points?
Obviously, an open-ended question like that isn't a lie, it's an invitation for information. Shouldn't it tell you something that when challenged to identify a lie, you have to fumble for things that by definition cannot be lies?
The behavior being alleged is serious. Ford has claimed that she was groped, that Kavanaugh attempted to forcibly undress her, and that he pinned her down and covered her mouth when she tried to yell for help. That's very serious. Now, if you want to say "yes, what she claimed was serious, but I think she made it up," fine. But, obviously, that's different from saying "there was nothing 'serious' about these claims."
She is a highly accomplished professional and a family woman with no criminal record, no history of making claims that were later debunked, etc. And she is someone who has managed to substantiate that her story predates the nomination. That all makes her a credible witness.
If that's your standard for a lack of credibility, would you agree that Brett Kavanaugh is not credible?
There's a famous old line about the definition of Chutzpah being when someone kills his parents and then pleads for mercy on the basis of being an orphan.
This reminded me a bit of that, since she attributes her psychological distress to the attack. If we were to view such psychological pain as disqualifying for a witness, it would be an incentive for attackers to be sure they were cruel enough to mess their victims up mentally, so the victims wouldn't be seen as credible.
We should have Judge testify under oath, so we know what the person she claims was there says, when under pains of perjury. For some reason, the Republicans really don't want that to happen.
The alleged victim came forward and was willing to testify. How do you think the Democrats should have reacted? Should they have told her that there's a process and she has no right to be heard publicly?
Watch his testimony. Against whom was he ranting?
If what she said happened really did happen, Kavanaugh is a would-be rapist and doesn't belong on the court.
What makes you think that?
Have you noticed the pattern of your rhetoric? You ask questions, but then conscious of the fact that you're getting your ass beat, you demand that the person "STFU." If you have confidence in your arguments, shouldn't you be eager to hear the responses to your questions, rather than trying so desperately to avoid having them responded to? Anyway, any time someone accuses a person of misconduct, that hurts the reputation. Either the accusation is true or not, and neither of us knows for sure. If it helps you to see it from the other direction, think of the same thing in terms of Paula Jones's accusation that Bill Clinton once exposed himself to her. Were you demanding to know how he gets his life back after that?
Do you see the hypocrisy of your bleating about the attacks on his reputation, while in the next breath you accuse her of being 'drunken,' 'psychotic,' and a 'trollop'? How is she to restore her reputation in the face of such blind slurs?
Actually, it's been independently confirmed by multiple individuals that she brought up the accusation before his nomination.
Blissfully wallowing in their own endless circle of stupidity like a brain dead douchebag. 
You need to award her a vag badge!
She needs to see a psychologist; she's obviously gone full retard on the topic. It's like talking in a tunnel and hearing their own echos.
She needs to see a psychologist; she's obviously gone full retard on the topic. It's like talking in a tunnel and hearing their own echos.
What makes you think that?
Let me simplify your laughably stupid argument and call it a day.....you think that a woman who wasn't a friend, didn't hang with Kavanaugh's crowd, can't remember when, what, where or how and cannot corroborate her claims with the people she claims were there should be taken seriously because.....wait for it snowflake.......she has a great BIG VAGINA.
hey shitbird, do you agree with the drunk, this is all just a Vast Left Wing Conspiracy orchestrated by the Clintons?
Bart was hysterical yesterday, the entire world saw a punkassed privileged bully come unhinged when cornered, like they always do, whining about his victimhood.
The entire world bore witness to the fact that Bart is a great BIG VAGINA out in the open where he can't bully his way to what he wants.