PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Wolverine,
... by displaying poor character.
... he was defending his character ...
... by displaying poor character.
... he was defending his character ...
That was before everyone found out that he's a drunken, rapey lush.
The fact that he can't seem to go a few minutes without a drink should question his capacity for doing his job. Since he was clearly drunk at the hearing, are we to believe he wasn't drinking when he was hearing cases as a federal judge? So he's "qualified", but that comes without the knowledge of his alcoholism.
LMAO... so he has a long record of doing a great job on the bench
Also... not one of the women has accused him of rape. Not one.
LMAO... so he has a long record of doing a great job on the bench, but you are going to pretend he is a raging alcoholic based on no evidence?
Also... not one of the women has accused him of rape. Not one.
but yet,Yes. If he tried to rape her, he should be disqualified on those grounds. Even if he didn't, though, he effectively disqualified himself by showing that he lacks the temperament, gravitas, and capacity for political impartiality needed for the role. As soon as he started ranting and raving about the revenge of the Clintons, etc., it became clear he was not qualified for anything more than leading a daily Two Minutes Hate on Fox News.
You know who has no allegations against him and is supported by Senators across the parties in the Senate? Merrick Garland.
What's wrong with Trump pulling Brett and nominating Garland? Garland would sail through confirmation and could be seated on SCOTUS tomorrow.

Hello Stretch,
That's glossing.
There is more to it than that.
but yet,
he's going to be a Supreme Court Justice
Isnt this a great country
Before this the fake mews drunken rape thing was the deal breaker. We've all already known that the Dems marched goosestep to "we won't vote in favor of this guy no matter what." Old news.
So there goes that shitty talking point...
I'm sure you'll be along with another one anytime now
But that is clouded now because of his alcoholism.
So how are we to determine if he did a good job since he has an addiction that would cloud his capacity to do his job? Why should an alcoholic sit on SCOTUS?
That we know of yet...by his own admission, Brett would get blackout drunk. So isn't it possible he might have raped someone and doesn't remember it because he's a drunk?
You know who has no allegations against him and is supported by Senators across the parties in the Senate? Merrick Garland.
What's wrong with Trump pulling Brett and nominating Garland? Garland would sail through confirmation and could be seated on SCOTUS tomorrow.
Before this the fake mews drunken rape thing was the deal breaker. We've all already known that the Dems marched goosestep to "we won't vote in favor of this guy no matter what." Old news.
No moron, it is not.
Saying he got blackout drunk as a teen, doesn't equate to him being an alcoholic today.
You know why he has no allegations? Because he was appointed by a Dem.
These accusations against Kavanaugh are unsubstantiated and no facts support the accusers at this point.
He said before that he frequently binge drank...his friends also say he was a binge drinker. One of them even said he was a "blackout" drunk.
How can he simultaneously be a binge drinker, but not an alcoholic? How can he simultaneously claim he never touched Ford while admitting he gets "blackout drunk" and goes binge-drinking?
We know his binge drinking was persistent through his HS and college years. Alcoholism isn't something that you can cure magically.
Sure it does, particularly when he gives conflicting testimony on his drinking habits. How often does he drink? What time of day does he start drinking? Can he provide any proof that he's sought counseling or treatment for his raging alcoholism?
You wouldn't want a drunk Uber driver, so why would you want a drunk SCOTUS justice?
Democrats don't nominate serial abusers and alcoholics.
Also, Gorsuch wasn't delayed at all. So the talking point that Democrats are doing this political obstruction is load of malarkey.
So what would substantiate them? An investigation not limited in its scope.
Hello Wolverine,
... by displaying poor character.
You know who has no allegations against him and is supported by Senators across the parties in the Senate? Merrick Garland.
What's wrong with Trump pulling Brett and nominating Garland? Garland would sail through confirmation and could be seated on SCOTUS tomorrow.
\Several Democrats voted for Gorsuch.
He didn't face any delays.
So there goes that shitty talking point...