Kavanaugh should step down.

Superfreak said:
and AGAIN... you lie. You show no evidence he was 'drunk'
Click to expand...

He bragged about his binge drinking and his friends bragged about blacking out.

That's what alcoholics do.

He did it throughout high school and college, and probably thereafter.

Is he having a drink right now? You don't know. Probably. Drunks can't just decide to not be drunks. It doesn't work like that.
 
Superfreak said:
Again, you are assigning your personal traits to him. He was not childish or drunk. You are simply a fucking moron.
Click to expand...

The dude bragged about binge drinking. He bragged about how much he loves beer. His yearbook is full of brags about his partying and drinking. He continued that drinking through college (and probably Law School). You don't just stop that shit when you graduate college. Alcoholism doesn't work that way.

He talked more about his love of beer than his love for his own family last week.

Bad form.
 
Superfreak said:
No moron... I stated what was accurate.
Click to expand...

So then following that argument through to its natural conclusion, you must demand Trump nominate a moderate to replace the moderate Kennedy.

Merrick Garland is a moderate.

And he'd sail through confirmation.

So why not him?


That is why the Dems didn't care or make shit up about him.
Click to expand...

So here's your argument:

Gorsuch didn't get any obstruction because he was filling a Conservative (Scalia's) seat on the bench. When Kennedy, a moderate, steps down, Trump nominates a hyper-partisan Republican operative, openly Conservative. Then you scream about partisanship on the part of the Democrats obstructing someone who is not a moderate, like Kennedy was, that would maintain the court's ideological integrity. So the true partisan here is you because you argue that Gorsuch should have been confirmed to maintain the court's integrity, but Kavanaugh must be confirmed to replace a moderate because "Trump picked him".

What a phony, baloney justification.

I see right through it for the laughable argument it is.
 
Fentoine Lum said:
Preppy Catholic all boys school for training the next generation of the aristocracy. Raping and pillaging a society is all part of the curriculum.
Click to expand...

Love watching all the Conservatives say the guy who binge drank and blacked out through high school and college isn't an alcoholic.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Wolverine,



It may help your understanding of the situation if you stop demonizing those with whom you disagree politically.

Question: (One I presume you would never wish to answer)

Do you understand that the greatness of this nation depends on having good people disagree on what's best? Good people yes the democrat leaders are not good people

You know, there is no part of the Constitution which assumes good people will all agree with one another. yep

And you do realize that means even if you believe strongly in a certain policy, that there may be someone else who is just as worthy as you, who disagrees with you. Yes but not in this case this is a political ploy no matter how you dress it up!

People who disagree with YOU are not necessarily bad people! Not all but to not see this for what it is would make one blind.

We need to get past this we/they thing in America and start thinking US.
Click to expand...

Yes we do but they are evil
 
LV426 said:
So then following that argument through to its natural conclusion, you must demand Trump nominate a moderate to replace the moderate Kennedy.

Merrick Garland is a moderate.

And he'd sail through confirmation.

So why not him?




So here's your argument:

Gorsuch didn't get any obstruction because he was filling a Conservative (Scalia's) seat on the bench. When Kennedy, a moderate, steps down, Trump nominates a hyper-partisan Republican operative, openly Conservative. Then you scream about partisanship on the part of the Democrats obstructing someone who is not a moderate, like Kennedy was, that would maintain the court's ideological integrity. So the true partisan here is you because you argue that Gorsuch should have been confirmed to maintain the court's integrity, but Kavanaugh must be confirmed to replace a moderate because "Trump picked him".

What a phony, baloney justification.

I see right through it for the laughable argument it is.
Click to expand...

No you fucking moron. There is no need to demand any such thing. You are too fucking ignorant to comprehend the basic logic. You are making a false assumption that because he appointed a conservative to replace a conservative (which is why Dems didn't fight it as hard) that he must then be obligated to replace a moderate with a moderate. Given that liberal lawyers liked Kavanaugh would suggest Kavanaugh is indeed someone both sides could accept (prior to the bullshit allegations from the Dems), I think you would want to rethink your moronic 'thought process'
 
LV426 said:
Brett's fraternity was Tappa Kegga Beer.

Last week, Brett talked about how much he loved beer more than he talked about how much he loves his wife.
Click to expand...

again... you continue to lie... which makes me believe you are the alcoholic incapable of rational thought.
 
Superfreak said:
No you fucking moron. There is no need to demand any such thing. You are too fucking ignorant to comprehend the basic logic. You are making a false assumption that because he appointed a conservative to replace a conservative (which is why Dems didn't fight it as hard) that he must then be obligated to replace a moderate with a moderate. Given that liberal lawyers liked Kavanaugh would suggest Kavanaugh is indeed someone both sides could accept (prior to the bullshit allegations from the Dems), I think you would want to rethink your moronic 'thought process'
Click to expand...

You made the argument that Gorsuch sailed through confirmation because Democrats were resigned to letting him replace another Conservative (Scalia).

You're making the argument now that Democrats are holding up Kavanaugh for political reasons. But the reason you just gave before for why Gorsuch sailed through confirmation, should also apply to Kennedy because he was a moderate justice. So to guarantee a confirmation, a moderate should have been chosen to replace him. Brett is no moderate.

So the justification for why Democrats didn't hold up Gorsuch should be the same for any choice to replace Kennedy, so long as that choice is a moderate. Garland is a moderate. Brett isn't. So by your own political rhetoric, the process was politicized because Trump is trying to change the ideological balance of the court...a balance that was struck when Democrats allowed Gorsuch to be confirmed.

You get that, right?
 
CFM said:
Difference is Kavanaugh is being railroaded and you simply aren't worth shit in a nigger's back yard.
Click to expand...

Brett's a drunk. A pathetic, pitiful drunk. I can practically see his next press conference; weepy victimhood as he checks himself into rehab.
 
LV426 said:
Brett's a drunk. A pathetic, pitiful drunk. I can practically see his next press conference; weepy victimhood as he checks himself into rehab.
Click to expand...

You can't see a damn thing with you head up some nigger's asshole licking the dingleberries off of it.
 
LV426 said:
You know who has no allegations against him and is supported by Senators across the parties in the Senate? Merrick Garland.

What's wrong with Trump pulling Brett and nominating Garland? Garland would sail through confirmation and could be seated on SCOTUS tomorrow.
Click to expand...

2j1kie.jpg


:laugh:
 
LV426 said:
So then following that argument through to its natural conclusion, you must demand Trump nominate a moderate to replace the moderate Kennedy.

Merrick Garland is a moderate.

And he'd sail through confirmation.

So why not him?




So here's your argument:

Gorsuch didn't get any obstruction because he was filling a Conservative (Scalia's) seat on the bench. When Kennedy, a moderate, steps down, Trump nominates a hyper-partisan Republican operative, openly Conservative. Then you scream about partisanship on the part of the Democrats obstructing someone who is not a moderate, like Kennedy was, that would maintain the court's ideological integrity. So the true partisan here is you because you argue that Gorsuch should have been confirmed to maintain the court's integrity, but Kavanaugh must be confirmed to replace a moderate because "Trump picked him".

What a phony, baloney justification.

I see right through it for the laughable argument it is.
Click to expand...

2j1kie.jpg


2783.rofl.gif
 
LV426 said:
Love watching all the Conservatives say the guy who binge drank and blacked out through high school and college isn't an alcoholic.
Click to expand...

I love how pathetic liberal snowflakes make up lies, just to justify their frustration over Hillary not being the President. :good4u:
 
Hello Wolverine,

Wolverine said:
Not at all showing he has a pair! Dems have no idea what that means, we are talking about a man whose had his family threatened by poisonous evil demonrats, had his reputation and character assassinated!
Click to expand...

A SCOTUS judge should remain nonpartial. If you believe he was justified because he thinks like you, then he is unfit for the job. Demeaning partisanship has no place on the Supreme Court.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top