Is anyone here in disagreement with the Republican prediction of gaining house seats?

LV426 said:
LOL! Stole it, how? You're talking about the Democratic Primary in 1948, not the actual Senate General Election.

So what we have here is another case of cawacko acting in bad faith by leaving out some pretty important details.

That's a pretty bad habit of yours, bruh. You do that a lot. You leave out exculpatory information to try and frame a debate in a more favorable light for your idiocy. So you leave things out deliberately because you hope people won't bother with due diligence.

That comes from an overbearing sense of entitlement and need for accommodation.

So you can take your bad faith argument and shove it up your ass.
Click to expand...

You win the internet today...…..

STANDING OVATION!
 
LV426 said:
So now you're admitting it was a primary, which parties can run however the fuck they want, and not the general.

OK, so that's one goalpost shift in one post so far...let's see where the next one is...



Annnnd, there it is...right on cue. Second goalpost shift. So you abandoned the pretense that LBJ cheated in general elections to shift the goalposts to try a different tactic. Like I give a shit about school elections. Your initial insistence was that he cheated to win the Senate Election. Then you moved the goalpost that it was really the primary, which parties run on their own. Then you moved the goalpost again when you realized both men cheated in the primary, to some "school election" thing no one gives a shit about.

And you did all that just so you don't have to admit that Republicans are cheaters today, and can only win elections today by cheating.

Weak. Fucking. Sauce.
Click to expand...

TEE HEE HEE!
 
LV426 said:
1. You said LBJ cheated in his Senate election.

2. You moved the bar and said it wasn't the election, but rather the primary (after I pointed that out)

3. You moved the bar again when you used another non-sequitur (whatever this "school election" thing was) because you couldn't draw an "analogy" between what LBJ did in the primary in 1948, and what Republicans are doing in general elections today.

4. You are an arrogant prick.
Click to expand...

Yes, I'm arrogant because you don't understand history. If you would read you would know Johnson's history with cheating. He did it often and was good at it. He would be impressed by the Republicans of today who couldn't win any race anywhere without cheating according to you. Not my fault you comprehend it. But you do show again you're just an angry prick.
 
cawacko said:
Yes, I'm arrogant because you don't understand history. If you would read you would know Johnson's history with cheating. He did it often and was good at it. He would be impressed by the Republicans of today who couldn't win any race anywhere without cheating according to you. Not my fault you comprehend it. But you do show again you're just an angry prick.
Click to expand...

What exactly is it I'm not "understanding"?

You said LBJ cheated in a Senate election...but that wasn't really true because he and his opponent both cheated in the Senate primary. Then you made a reference to a "school election" (whatever the fuck that means), then you just very generally said he cheated "often", but the only examples you gave was a primary election, and a "school election" (that included no reference, just your insistence).

So what we have here is you desperately trying to get yourself OK with GOP cheating today by imagining LBJ as a rampant cheater despite only being able to really cite one instance, and even then you kinda fudged it to accommodate your point.

I don't get why you are doing that. It appears you're trying to lessen the importance of institutionalized GOP cheating today by harkening back to a single instance in a primary from 70 years ago. Maybe your problem is that you recognize the GOP are rampant cheater today, but because of your bothsiderism, you need to find some kind of equivalence because you cannot fathom that the Conservatives today are lying, cheating scumbags with no redeemable qualities or merits. But because you have it in your head that there has to be a balance to everything, you have to stretch your ass way back 70 years to try and undermine my argument rather than just admit to the fact that Conservatives can only win elections now by cheating.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
For Democrats building on Governorships and State House will be huge going into 2020 if they have the majority of those and the House of Representatives then they would have a huge strategic advantage going into an election on a census year that Obama pissed away in 2010.
Click to expand...

I've read analysis on the Cook Political Report that as few as 700 State Legislative seats could flip this election cycle, with the possibility going up as high as 1,000 seats. In addition to that, there are twelve (!) governorships for which Democrats are in prime position to flip, which would give them a majority of state governorships.
 
LV426 said:
What exactly is it I'm not "understanding"?

You said LBJ cheated in a Senate election...but that wasn't really true because he and his opponent both cheated in the Senate primary. Then you made a reference to a "school election" (whatever the fuck that means), then you just very generally said he cheated "often", but the only examples you gave was a primary election, and a "school election" (that included no reference, just your insistence).

So what we have here is you desperately trying to get yourself OK with GOP cheating today by imagining LBJ as a rampant cheater despite only being able to really cite one instance, and even then you kinda fudged it to accommodate your point.

I don't get why you are doing that. It appears you're trying to lessen the importance of institutionalized GOP cheating today by harkening back to a single instance in a primary from 70 years ago. Maybe your problem is that you recognize the GOP are rampant cheater today, but because of your bothsiderism, you need to find some kind of equivalence because you cannot fathom that the Conservatives today are lying, cheating scumbags with no redeemable qualities or merits. But because you have it in your head that there has to be a balance to everything, you have to stretch your ass way back 70 years to try and undermine my argument rather than just admit to the fact that Conservatives can only win elections now by cheating.
Click to expand...

I'll write this in simple English and won't use history or anything that would require you to read and I'll do it using a new analogy. It would be equivalent of a golfer doing something so amazing it would make Tiger Woods jealous.
 
cawacko said:
I'll write this in simple English and won't use history or anything that would require you to read and I'll do it using a new analogy. It would be equivalent of a golfer doing something so amazing it would make Tiger Woods jealous.
Click to expand...

So then you're saying the extent of GOP cheating today would make LBJ jealous. OK, so you're then admitting that the GOP are rampant cheaters today who have taken cheating to a whole new level, beyond anything LBJ or any other politician over the last 240 years has.

So it's sort of like a backhanded compliment to LBJ. But one that is somewhat fudged on your part.
 
LV426 said:
So then you're saying the extent of GOP cheating today would make LBJ jealous. OK, so you're then admitting that the GOP are rampant cheaters today who have taken cheating to a whole new level, beyond anything LBJ or any other politician over the last 240 years has.

So it's sort of like a backhanded compliment to LBJ. But one that is somewhat fudged on your part.
Click to expand...

OMG, it is impossible to talk to you
 
Jarod said:
I think Dems get the house, I could be wrong. I think we also build on governorships and state legislatures.

Senate is out of reach without a serious overperforming of the polls.
Click to expand...

So it's STILL that many racist that support the republican party?
 
Mott the Hoople said:
For Democrats building on Governorships and State House will be huge going into 2020 if they have the majority of those and the House of Representatives then they would have a huge strategic advantage going into an election on a census year that Obama pissed away in 2010.
Click to expand...

um
 
TTQ64 said:
So it's STILL that many racist that support the republican party?
Click to expand...

All the racists support the Republican party and many others, some ignorant, some angry, some believe they are being practical.
 
Jarod said:
All the racists support the Republican party and many others, some ignorant, some angry, some believe they are being practical.
Click to expand...

Isn't it wonderful there are no racists in the Democratic Party and no negative policies come from the Democratic Party that hurt minorities? It's a beautiful thing isn't it?
 
Jarod said:
All the racists support the Republican party and many others, some ignorant, some angry, some believe they are being practical.
Click to expand...

Then it's still a lot of racist in this country.

People keep saying they are a minority, but it's enough of them to keep power. …….and that's a lot. Just saying.
 
TTQ64 said:
Then it's still a lot of racist in this country.

People keep saying they are a minority, but it's enough of them to keep power. …….and that's a lot. Just saying.
Click to expand...

I am learning now that it's more than I used to think.
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
So their was a lot of hype about "WALK AWAY" and "RED WAIVE".....


Do our Republicans posters here still agree with the Republican line that we will experience a red waive and the Republicans will gain seats in the House and 5-10 seats in the Senate?
Click to expand...

these kooks eat up every delusion Trump feeds them with shitsauce
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top