Have Women Gone Too Far?

Phantasmal said:
She’s known as SexyCyborg! Wonder if Watermark wouid like her?
Click to expand...
Yes she is and I love how she uses her sexuality to make the Gods of Silicone Valley uncomfortable as hell. :) Not to mention I'm never opposed to any serious eye candy. Having said that, as a DIY builder she is legit and is one of the most knowledgeable people you'll see on Youtube on 3D printing technology. So don't let the pretty face fool you...she's legit.


OH dear god. Don't you dare mention this poor lady to him. She has enough problems!!! Let her blissfully do her life's work with out having to acknowledge that in life that there are people like Watermark!

Besides, I think she's more Billy's and 3D's type...definately 3D!!
 
Mott the Hoople said:
OH dear god. Don't you dare mention this poor lady to him. She has enough problems!!! Let her blissfully do her lifes work with out having to acknowledge that in life that there are people like Watermark!
Click to expand...
You made me laugh out loud, again. I’m always having to rely to my hubby your hilarious posts.
 
Old Trapper said:
Probably because being the feminist you are you can't see reality. Now you have nothing to argue so you, and phantasy, attack me, not the facts.
Click to expand...

Your use of the nick "phantasy" is pretty Freudian, given all the hyperbole and imaginary misdeeds your other post contained. As far as personal attacks.... don't see one. I merely pointed out that my post triggered you into spewing a bunch of nonsense. As for me being a feminist, you seem to define that term pretty negatively. If wanting my three daughters to have the same career choices, pay, and opportunities as my two sons means I'm a feminist, then I'm guilty as charged, and proud of it. Unlike some guys apparently believe, being a feminist doesn't mean that you favor women over men. I believe that all people should be treated as equally as possible when it comes to the basic human rights we all desire.

For the most part I like many of your posts and agree with you on several issues. It's too bad that this one isn't the same.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Yes she is and I love how she uses her sexuality to make the Gods of Silicone Valley uncomfortable as hell. :) Not to mention I'm never opposed to any serious eye candy. Having said that, as a DIY builder she is legit and is one of the most knowledgeable people you'll see on Youtube on 3D printing technology. So don't let the pretty face fool you...she's legit.


OH dear god. Don't you dare mention this poor lady to him. She has enough problems!!! Let her blissfully do her life's work with out having to acknowledge that in life that there are people like Watermark!

Besides, I think she's more Billy's and 3D's type...definately 3D!!
Click to expand...
I think she might hurt 3D
 
kudzu said:
In early times Jewish women participated in every aspect of community life except the Temple priesthood. Women freely engaged in commerce and real estate (Prov. 31), as well as in manual labor (Ex. 35:25; Ruth 2:7; 1 Sam. 8:13). They were not excluded from Temple worship.

Women played music in the sanctuary (Ps. 68:25), prayed there (1 Sam 1:12), sang and danced with men in religious processions (2 Sam 6:19, 22) and participated in music and festivities at weddings (Song of Songs 2:7, 3:11).


Jesus’ New Testament followers continued to follow in his footsteps, including women in their gatherings (Acts 1:14) and counting them as co-laborers for Christ (Rom. 16:3). This was only fitting, for Jesus the Messiah, in his love, shattered the restricted status of women in the rabbinic times in which he lived. Because of him, all individuals, Jew or Greek, slave or free, male or female, can be one in Christ and enjoy unequalled freedom as children of God.
Click to expand...

So where did all this equality get off to?
 
Phantasmal said:
I thought both, gay and epileptic. Have you noticed that a lot of religions and governments have been influenced by epileptics.
Click to expand...

From 1 Corinthians, chapter 7:

Now for the matters you wrote about: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” 2 But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband. 3 The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. 4 The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife. 5 Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. 6 I say this as a concession, not as a command. 7 I wish that all of you were as I am. But each of you has your own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.

8 Now to the unmarried[a] and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do. 9 But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.

~~~~

Paul didn't have much regard for sex, or for women.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Your use of the nick "phantasy" is pretty Freudian, given all the hyperbole and imaginary misdeeds your other post contained. As far as personal attacks.... don't see one. I merely pointed out that my post triggered you into spewing a bunch of nonsense. As for me being a feminist, you seem to define that term pretty negatively. If wanting my three daughters to have the same career choices, pay, and opportunities as my two sons means I'm a feminist, then I'm guilty as charged, and proud of it. Unlike some guys apparently believe, being a feminist doesn't mean that you favor women over men. I believe that all people should be treated as equally as possible when it comes to the basic human rights we all desire.

For the most part I like many of your posts and agree with you on several issues. It's too bad that this one isn't the same.
Click to expand...


I don't think Trapper has daughters.. My father was well educated and he made it pretty clear early on in the late 1950s and early 1960s that he would back me up if I wanted to study chemical engineering.

He was also a Conservative.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Your use of the nick "phantasy" is pretty Freudian, given all the hyperbole and imaginary misdeeds your other post contained. As far as personal attacks.... don't see one. I merely pointed out that my post triggered you into spewing a bunch of nonsense. As for me being a feminist, you seem to define that term pretty negatively. If wanting my three daughters to have the same career choices, pay, and opportunities as my two sons means I'm a feminist, then I'm guilty as charged, and proud of it. Unlike some guys apparently believe, being a feminist doesn't mean that you favor women over men. I believe that all people should be treated as equally as possible when it comes to the basic human rights we all desire.

For the most part I like many of your posts and agree with you on several issues. It's too bad that this one isn't the same.
Click to expand...


I don't think Trapper has daughters.. My father was well educated and he made it pretty clear early on in the late 1950s and early 1960s that he would back me up if I wanted to study chemical engineering.

He was also a Conservative.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
She sounds awesome. SexyCyborg, I mean, not 3D's wife.
Click to expand...

From what I've seen they're both Awesome. ;)

Her 3D printed bikini is a bit over the top and her Fiber Optic Transillumination is like way cool.

I think her videos are great. She's showing young ladies how to do really neat things with tech gadgets that are decidedly interesting to young women. Most of the stuff she does is pretty standard elbow grease assembly and computer coding but she shows how to do those tasks in ways that are fun for girls. More power to her.
 
Last edited:
Phantasmal said:
Ahhhh, drama queen, it has to be either or with this type. They see only black and white and no shades of gray.

Women always tell the truth, men always lie, is just drama, no one is saying that.
Click to expand...

Then why is it queenie that the men are never believed, and the women are never doubted save for the Kavanaugh case?

Why is it that so many fathers lose their children in a divorce based on the lies of the mother?

Get over yourself, and look at reality some day.
 
Nordberg said:
Did you really post that? He raped and drugged women for decades. Exactly what physical evidence could remain after a long time? However, the fact that many women testified to him doing it ,is proof in court.
Click to expand...

Point being what? In criminal cases, the burden of proving the defendant's guilt is on the prosecution, and they must establish that fact beyond a reasonable doubt. Then you have the statute of limitations which most of those womens cases had long passed. In a civil case, all the plaintiff has the burden of proof only a preponderance of the evidence. Under our Constitution the accused has the right to a speedy trial, the right to confront the accusers, and the right to present a defense.

In the case of these women, just how many reported the incident at the time it occurred? How many knew of Cosby's reputation, and willingly went to his place?

But once again you are saying none of the women lied, and the fault is all that of Cosby.
 
Old Trapper said:
Then why is it queenie that the men are never believed, and the women are never doubted save for the Kavanaugh case?

Why is it that so many fathers lose their children in a divorce based on the lies of the mother?

Get over yourself, and look at reality some day.
Click to expand...
Men are believed, only a small percentage of rapes reported are even brought to trial.

There are many women who lose their children to fathers based on lies or the inability to afford a lawyer.

Judges base their ruling on evidence and in some cases professional opinions, rarely on just the word of one person over the other.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top