HIgh Schools now banning MAGA hats!!!!

Oneuli said:
If Clinton or Obama had gotten elected on a platform of crass racism, misogyny, and xenophobia, such that their campaign slogans amounted to fighting words for a big chunk of the population, you'd have seen efforts to keep those distractions out of the school, too.
Click to expand...

why do you continue to post your lies?......
 
Quote Originally Posted by katzgar View Post
MAGA caps equal violence. Thanks for proving it

Good grief. Wearing a cap supporting a duly elected president now equals violence.

Send in the clowns...
 
Oneuli said:
If Clinton or Obama had gotten elected on a platform of crass racism, misogyny, and xenophobia, such that their campaign slogans amounted to fighting words for a big chunk of the population, you'd have seen efforts to keep those distractions out of the school, too.
Click to expand...

If you think MAGA amounts to fighting words, you're the problem not the slogan.
 
CFM said:
It's obvious you don't but you keep claiming you do. The Republican party elected it's first President in 1860. That's 159 years ago. The Democrats elected their first President in 1828. That's 191 years ago.
Click to expand...

So, the Republican party has gone 159 years without ever once having a remotely successful presidential nomination campaign by someone who isn't a white man. What does that tell you?

The blacks and females Republicans pick are based on being the most qualified. The blacks and females Democrats pick are based on being black and female.
Click to expand...

Well, since the Republicans have never picked a black or female for the presidential nomination, that's a meaningless statement in that context. As for other contexts, I direct your attention to Clarence Thomas -- one of the least qualified judges ever to be put on the Supreme Court.
 
Tkaffen said:
I got harassed wearing a Michigan State hat while on the University of Michigan campus. Apparently they were upset they lost the game.
I wonder if they will ban Michigan State apparel on the University of Michigan campus. Obviously wearing a Michigan State hat on the University of Michigan campus agitates some people and is a trigger for problems.
Click to expand...

That's what it boils down to with the MAGA hats. The left is still mad they lost an election and try to justify their violent reactions to someone wearing an inanimate object because it hurts their tender feelings.
 
Oneuli said:
So, the Republican party has gone 159 years without ever once having a remotely successful presidential nomination campaign by someone who isn't a white man. What does that tell you?



Well, since the Republicans have never picked a black or female for the presidential nomination, that's a meaningless statement in that context. As for other contexts, I direct your attention to Clarence Thomas -- one of the least qualified judges ever to be put on the Supreme Court.
Click to expand...

The Democratic party went far longer then picked one not because he was qualified but because he was black. What does that tell you?

The context excuse again? It didn't work the first and, as you know, it didn't work this time.
 
CFM said:
If you think MAGA amounts to fighting words, you're the problem not the slogan.
Click to expand...

No, the problem is Trump. "MAGA" isn't inherently offensive, any more than "Sieg Heil" is, or "Arbeit Macht Frei," or "Gott Mit Uns," etc. But the historical associations of those terms with fascism make them fighting words.
 
Oneuli said:
Nah. Hitler was once popular with the majority of his countrymen, whereas Trump has always had approval ratings below 50%. Also, Hitler was a self-made man, whereas Trump had his old-money fortune handed to him by his daddy. They have many differences. However, what holds them together is a political strategy to appeal to the dumbest of their countrymen by way of preying on fear of religious and ethnic minorities, as well as a desire for a cult of personality.
Click to expand...

so in summary, for you the difference between Hitler and Trump is that you like Hitler.......
 
Oneuli said:
If Clinton or Obama had gotten elected on a platform of crass racism, misogyny, and xenophobia, such that their campaign slogans amounted to fighting words for a big chunk of the population, you'd have seen efforts to keep those distractions out of the school, too.
Click to expand...

wait, you don't think Obama was elected on crass racism?......do you really think Obama would have even been nominated if he was white?......
 
CFM said:
The Democratic party went far longer then picked one not because he was qualified but because he was black. What does that tell you?

The context excuse again? It didn't work the first and, as you know, it didn't work this time.
Click to expand...

The Democratic Party, as you presumably know, used to be the party of white racists, southerners, states-rightsers, the under-educated, rural people, conservatives, etc. When they effectively served the same demographic as today's GOP does, of course they didn't give black or female candidates the time of day when it came to consideration for the presidential nominee. But, they changed, and by the 1980s Jesse Jackson was getting more support than any black or female presidential candidate ever has in the GOP. Then there were the breakthroughs of Clinton and Obama, who, as you know, were both qualified. But the Republicans would rather pick a corrupt failed businessman who didn't have a day of relevant experience, since at least he was a white dude.
 
CFM said:
You don't make truthful claims. Any honest person reading your posts knows that.
Click to expand...

As you know, I only make truthful claims. That's why you're reduced to blubbering in generic terms about my supposed untruths, rather than actually being able to identify any. If you were honest, you'd admit that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top