So now you believe him? Just yesterday you and your pals said you couldn't trust anything Cohen said because he was a liar.
So now you DON't believe him? Just yesterday you and your pals said Cohen was telling the truth finally.
Depraved Dems Devastated - COHEN says NO PEEPEE TAPE
- Thread starter Bigdog
- Start date
So now you DON't believe him? Just yesterday you and your pals said Cohen was telling the truth finally.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
One day Cohen is a liar and the next day you believe him. You need to cut back on your hypocrisy.
hahahahahahahahahaha ... that's pretty good, Bigdog. Have you considered taking your routine to the Jonny Carson Show ... it has potential.
He has a good point. And you obviously are unable to counter it.
countryboy
Verified User
And that has what, to do with Russian collusion?
"“I’ve heard about these tapes for a long time. I’ve had many people contact me over the years. I have no reason to believe that that tape exists,” Cohen responded."
-Cohen
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...n-to-believe-trump-golden-showers-tape-exists
U.S. Intel's Steele Dossier proved wrong, again. No evidence to support Obama's peepee allegations.
Understanding the conservative mind can be a dizzying experience. In the conservative mind, if Cohen says something bad about Trump, no matter how definitive he is about it (e.g., saying that Trump is a racist, a con man, and a cheat, who knowingly instructed Cohen to violate federal law), that should be disregarded entirely. If, on the other hand, Cohen says that he doesn't have a reason to believe that tape exists, then that must be taken as definitive proof that it doesn't exist.
How do people with brains that work that way even get through day-to-day life?
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Understanding the liberal mind can be a dizzying experience. In the liberal mind, if Cohen says something bad about Trump, no matter how definitive he is about it (e.g., saying that Trump is a racist, a con man, and a cheat, who knowingly instructed Cohen to violate federal law), that should be believed entirely. If, on the other hand, Cohen says that he doesn't have a reason to believe that tape exists, then that must be taken as definitive proof that it does exist.
How do people with brains that work that way even get through day-to-day life?
No. That's simply not the way the liberal mind works. You see, we're actually sane. So, I will forthrightly admit I have no idea whether the tape exists. There were apparently rumors circulating about such a tape, but they might have been fabricated by Trump's enemies -- or just fabulists looking to make a buck inventing a salacious story to sell a muck-raker. Then again, we know that Trump is a shameless libertine who has a tendency to go to sex workers for his sexual needs, so it's not inherently implausible, either. But for a conservative, that kind of "I honestly don't know" response to a question is unthinkable. The reality of any situation is dictated strictly by the partisan politics, and so the fact such a tape would be damaging to Trump means that they must believe it has been proven not to exist, even if their only evidence for that is that some guy they don't trust says he personally isn't aware of its existence. I just don't understand how people with such muddled brains get through their days.
Heh, I've been puzzling over the same thing since Cohen's testimony. He stated that he didn't know anything about collusion with Russia. This was immediately seized upon by Drummpf and his moronic band of idiots as PROOF THAT THERE WAS NO COLLUSION. But all the other stuff that Cohen said -- that's all a lie. Really. It is.
Hey I have never seen them either. They don’t exist
I think the better point is, this is their ray of sunshine.
“ members of the jury, the evidence I have presented today casts grave doubt on the probability that my client, the Republican President was urinated upon by not one but two of Vladimir Putin’s whores!”
-Counselor big dog closing argument ^^
Feint praise that huh.
Last edited:
cancel2 2022
Canceled
That's it Dude ... you keep "focusing" on that ...
Are you taking the piss?
Yep... weird people, those conservatives.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
There is much that you do not understand, glasshopper!!
Bigdog: "The man has been a very public figure for most of his life. All the Media powers, the IRS, the FBI and DOJ Deep State, the Globalists, the good ol' blue blood political elite .. everyone ... has been investigating this man and have uncovered no wrong doing."
Yurt: "He has a good point. And you obviously are unable to counter it."
Jack: Uh, yeah. Look, when Bigdog takes his Act on the Road, you should go as his 'straight man'. You know, like another 'Laurel & Hardy'.
On the bright side your hero quite possibly was not urinated on by two Russian Street hookers ! It’s a great day! Beers are on cabana poon everyone!
Yep. Unless we first assumed that Trump took every single matter to Cohen, Cohen's lack of knowledge of something doesn't tell us anything as to whether it exists. The reasonable expectation is that Trump would have taken things to Cohen where a legal outcome might be arranged -- problems for which a non-disclosure agreement, or something of that sort, could be a solution. We wouldn't have expected him to be involved in any case where a lawyer couldn't be expected to accomplish anything.... such as a case where Trump was being blackmailed by Russia. What's Cohen going to do? Send over some big guy to intimidate Putin? Try to lock the Russian intelligence service down with a confidentiality agreement? It makes sense that Cohen wouldn't be part of the inner circle when it came to things like kompromat.
Even when it comes to the day-to-day domestic corruption of the Trump Crime Family, it's not clear that they would have relied on just one consigliere for all their schemes. At least in the world of legitimate business, organizations use different lawyers for different projects, and no one lawyer has any clue about the whole range of activities. Wouldn't something similar be necessary in crime businesses? Cohen could be the go-to guy for covering up trysts with hookers, but some other guy could be the one for petty grifts, and another for tax swindles, and so on.
As far as I'm aware, I have never hopped on glass.