Did nattering Nancy have her handcuffs handy, lol?
DEMS will read the ENTIRE (tho redacted) MUELLER report on House FL THU!
- Thread starter Centerleftfl
- Start date
Did nattering Nancy have her handcuffs handy, lol?
Superfreak
Verified User
That is pure nonsense. Barr is the AG. Barr is the one that determines prosecution. That does not alter the ability of Congress to try to impeach if they so choose.
Superfreak
Verified User
This simply proves you are not paying attention.
The Mueller teams redactions are the SAME as Barr's. They worked together to redact what they are LEGALLY required to redact.
Barr's redactions are absolutely valid. You have no basis to claim otherwise.
Althea's posting have become like a dotard's -routine factual errors coupled with TDS
sure.
direct quote:
this is not "not enough evidence beyond a reasonable doubt."
it literally says in black and white "no evidence at all"
as in zero.
2 years of fake news.
"The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."
That'all get'r done.To a weak mind everyone looks like an idiot. As pointed out...… the weakass appeasing bribery based democrats would not know leadership if it bit them on the ass. Thanks for proving the point. There are some points worth HAMMERING HOME. If you want to live in peace you must prepare for war continually. Or as the Christ Himself pointed out, "When a strong man fully armed guards his own palace his goods are in peace." -- Luke 11:21
Hey fcktard, your desire for military aggression is not how someone who wants to live in peace acts, nor is Jesus' comment about guarding one's home a call to lie about Iraq WMDs or Iranian nukes as a pretext to kill others.
Superfreak
Verified User
LMAO... wrong. If there was overwhelming evidence others in trumps campaign did, Mueller would have indicted them. There is nothing. There always was nothing. Mueller knew it a year ago.
Superfreak
Verified User
reading is hard...umkay?
Superfreak
Verified User
Yes it did. Black and white. Try improving your reading comprehension skills.
they know how to read.
the problem is they have been gaslit by the deepstate for more than 2 years.
And I will bet the you believed there was a Clinton run child sex trafficking ring in the basement of a pizza parlor.
CharacterAssassin
Verified User
It's a simple statement of objective reality. Clearly something you lack the emotional capacity to face. Bummer.
Yes, there was, and Mueller explained it.
More denial of objective reality.
Nah. He handed a roadmap to congress for even deeper, far reaching investigations into your god.
And that's fun!
CharacterAssassin
Verified User
Silly, spastic cunt, there was no end of collusion. Here, let me help you, simp.
https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/...7BmcacwiMRVR_-OA1fTpuFJ3CyccmQ_FU9EomOQ0vz0DA
CharacterAssassin
Verified User
No, whore, it didn't. https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/...7BmcacwiMRVR_-OA1fTpuFJ3CyccmQ_FU9EomOQ0vz0DA
Please stop fisting yourself in public.
Superfreak
Verified User
You idiot. The above is not from the Mueller report. It is some left wing nut portraying what they really really want the Mueller report to say.
Note "though, as Asha Rangappa and I have written, the more analytically precise issues to consider are whether Trump Campaign associates “coordinated with, cooperated with, encouraged, or gave support” to the Russia/WikiLeaks election interference activities. "
Notice how it went from coordinated to 'encouraged'. The stupidity of the left never ceases to amaze.
CharacterAssassin
Verified User
No, you pathetic, miserable cunt, it's a summation of points from the report. And I notice you can't address or refute a single on of them.
The report established and demonstrated collusion, sill whore. Your denial of that reality won't change a single thing.