Democrats subpoena more Trump ex-aides, including Hicks

[reagansghost]

You do understand that an investigation comes BEFORE someone has been found guilty of a crime?

OOPSY!!

“To be sure, there are limits on Congress’s investigative authority. But those limits do not substantially constrain Congress. So long as Congress investigates on a subject matter on which ‘legislation could be had,’ Congress acts as contemplated by Article I of the Constitution,” Mehta wrote. “Applying those principles here compels the conclusion that President Trump cannot block the subpoena to Mazars.”

https://www.vox.com/2019/5/20/18633183/amit-mehta-judge-mazars-trump-subpoena

 

[reagansghost]

Cite the case.

https://www.vox.com/2019/5/20/18633183/amit-mehta-judge-mazars-trump-subpoena

 

[Legion]

Barr offered access to a less-redacted version of the report to 12 members of Congress — six Democrats and six Republicans. But as of Tuesday afternoon, only Rep. Doug Collins, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, opted to view it. A third, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said he planned to review the report later.

Collins and Graham told POLITICO that what’s underneath the redactions has no bearing on Mueller's conclusions: that there wasn’t enough evidence to charge any American with conspiring with Russians to influence the 2016 presidential election and that Justice Department guidelines prevented Mueller from reaching a legal conclusion on whether President Donald Trump obstructed Justice.

“It didn’t change anything,” Collins said.


https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/30/mueller-report-redacted-1295105

 

[reagansghost]

Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
Cite the case.

https://www.vox.com/2019/5/20/186331...trump-subpoena

 

[Legion]

https://www.vox.com/2019/5/20/18633183/amit-mehta-judge-mazars-trump-subpoena

From the article you cited:

"this is likely just the first round in the escalating fight for Trump’s financial records. And Mehta’s ruling is narrow, it just deals with the Mazars subpoena.."

 

[reagansghost]

From the article you cited:

"this is likely just the first round in the escalating fight for Trump’s financial records. And Mehta’s ruling is narrow, it just deals with the Mazars subpoena.."

and?

 

[Legion]

and?

It's a little early to be celebrating, isn't it?

 

[reagansghost]

It's a little early to be celebrating, isn't it?

you've got nothing

when do think Cuomo will sign that legislation btw?

 

[Legion]

you've got nothing when do think Cuomo will sign that legislation btw?

I've got nothing?

You've got an unsubstantiated claim that the Mueller report (that you claimed only 3 people have seen) contains evidence of impeachable crimes.

You've got a single, narrow ruling by a District Court judge which is already being appealed to a superior court.

when do think Cuomo will sign that legislation btw?

He said he would if it passes both houses in the NY Assembly. Don't you keep up with the news?

 

[Superfreak]

OOPSY!!

“To be sure, there are limits on Congress’s investigative authority. But those limits do not substantially constrain Congress. So long as Congress investigates on a subject matter on which ‘legislation could be had,’ Congress acts as contemplated by Article I of the Constitution,” Mehta wrote. “Applying those principles here compels the conclusion that President Trump cannot block the subpoena to Mazars.”

https://www.vox.com/2019/5/20/18633183/amit-mehta-judge-mazars-trump-subpoena

Again, WRONG. What subject matter for legislation did they give? Oh yeah, none. They are fishing. The lower court nonsense will be overturned.

 

[Gonzomin]

I've got nothing?

You've got an unsubstantiated claim that the Mueller report (that you claimed only 3 people have seen) contains evidence of impeachable crimes.

You've got a single, narrow ruling by a District Court judge which is already being appealed to a superior court.

He said he would if it passes both houses in the NY Assembly. Don't you keep up with the news?

Obstruction claims are backed by nearly a thousand prosecutors. The vast majority see the Mueller report as proof of Trump's blatant obstruction. They see the case as easily winnable. That is why Trump is blocking them exactly as a guilty person would. If he were innocent he would be pleased to remove that stain in court. One big win would assure his re-election. For some reason he is putting every effort into stonewalling and blocking. I can see why he is doing it. It is not because he is innocent.
Trump is a crook.

 

[Legion]

Obstruction claims are backed by nearly a thousand prosecutors.

List these "nearly a thousand prosecutors," the jurisdictions they represent, and cite the basis for their allegations.

I'll understand if you can't, naturally.

 

[Truth Detector]

You can answer your own question, tell us specifically, what crimes is Barr supposedly investigating?

Answer the question you dishonest hack; what crimes are they investigating Trump for? Barr is the AG; they do investigations. The crimes are spying on a political campaign for partisan political purposes and abusing Government power.

Has any criminal act been proven committed that justifys Barr investigating?

Absolutely; a crime of the worst kind. Abuse of power. I am sorry snowflake, but Obama and his cronies in the JD don't have the right to spy on a campaign and use a salacious, lie filled dossier bought and paid for by the Hillary camp to smear a President.

If you had a brain, which you obviously do not, you would be outraged by such behavior. But because you are a partisan hack and cannot see anything beyond that Pinocchio nose of yours, you can't comprehend the OBVIOUS detriment that has on our Republic.

What is the purpose of Barr's investigation that you Trumpkins are so giddy about? Show us the crimes that someone has been found guilty of committing?
Do you need a further explanation?

You're such a dishonest dunce. You think by asking stupid questions you look less stupid and less of a partisan hack? FAIL.

Run along you whiny little asswhipe. Life is too short for your special brand of stupid and dishonesty.

 

[Truth Detector]

This line is an instant classic, "Imagine the sad state of our politics if BOTH parties acted out like this every time they lost elections," seems "truthie" is in a state of denial with a selective memory

Looks like Arsecheese is in another brain dead comma. Who the fuck are you talking to in the third person you tiresome buffoon?

First off, the Democrats have only been investigating for only five months now, seems we have to remind "truthie" again, Mueller was a Special Council appointed by a Trump nominee in a Trump Justice Department.

Trump didn't appoint the SP you brain dead dullard. I wish you could get even the most OBVIOUS facts correct.

What are CRIMES are the Democrats investigating? The Congress is not an investigative body. They are a legislative body. Crimes are investigated by the Justice Department. After TWO years of a SP investigation, what are the Democrats RE-INVESTIGATING?

Secondly, since 2009, the GOP and the right wing media working together have investigating and litigating anything and everything Obama/Hillary 24/7 for over a decade. If any precedent was been set, the icons you worship set it back in 2009

That is a LIE and it is LAME. Much like all of your arguments. But I am amused by lying partisan hacks like you who think that Government employees should be allowed to use PRIVATE UNSECURED e-mail servers to conduct their business and transmit CLASSIFIED information over them.

It's almost as LAME and STUPID as believing that an Administration who LIED about an attack on Government facilities should not be investigate by oversight committees to get at the truth.

You are the poster child for all that is wrong with the Liberal left in this country.

"Imagine the sad state of our politics if BOTH parties acted out like this every time they lost elections," priceless

In order to comprehend what I said, you would first need a brain. Carry on.

 

[Truth Detector]

Pull your head out of Donald Trump's rectum, and you will see for yourself idiot!

So all you have are adhom attacks; you can't specify any criminal activity. It's just because you say so. STFU you dishonest partisan hack.

There are a lot of idiots here in this forum, but you are the No. 1 Idiot here in this forum. Congratulations!

Irony coming from the #1 idiot of the forum. Buy a mirror sad sack.

 

[Truth Detector]

LOL! You're I'm quite stupid.

Yes, you are.

 

[Truth Detector]

Meh. It's my TDS. He's I'm perpetually cum-drunk from fellating the spirit of his my god, Donnie Moscow.

So sad.

 

[Truth Detector]

He's is actually just another typical immoral, deplorable, Trump supporter, who is feeding off of Trump's corruption.

The truth is, Truth Deflector knows that Donald Trump is a Corrupt President who is also a liar, cheater, racist, and crook- because he voted for him knowing that already, and for those specific reasons.

These lost souls who voted for Donald Trump, and are still supporting him, wanted someone in the White House that best reflected their own flawed personal values, prejudices, human qualities, social behaviors, and personality disorders.

They wanted someone much like themselves, and they hand-selected it!

Much like Putin did!

Don't ever expect these pond-scum to admit a thing!

These ship-of-fools have decided to all go down with their captain!

I R O N Y!!! Two of the biggest liars on the forum in a circle jerk of stupidity. Priceless!.

 

[Truth Detector]

in Mueller's report
have you seen it?

I downloaded it; can't find a single impeachable offense in it. Perhaps you can help us with the exact language and page number?

 

[Truth Detector]

exactly the point, no one's see it except Muller, Barr and Trump

Anyone can see it moron; it's downloadable. If you haven't seen it, where do all these specious claims come from? Source?

btw did Mueller exonerate Trump on the Obstruction of Justice rap?

There is nothing to exonerate; Trump did not commit any crime. We're still waiting for this proof you have to make your false specious claims.

who would decide that, his employee Barr?

Yes, the AG is the decider. Does that make you cry?

there ya go scout

Yep; you came up empty as usual. Much like your head; not much between those ears.