Superfreak
Verified User
Talking about things and doing them are different things counselor. Perhaps you should learn that before going back to court.
Mueller speaks at 11 am today
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
Talking about things and doing them are different things counselor. Perhaps you should learn that before going back to court.
LIE and LAME; but we can sure find plenty of instances of you looking like a lying moron.
WRONG: if there was never any criminal conspiracy and you find NO ONE got fired, NO ONE destroyed evidence, NO ONE refused to cooperate, NO ONE shut down the investigation, NO ONE chose not to release the entire report and NO ONE exercised executive privilege; then there was no obstruction.
1) Mullet said it backwards on purpose. No one says something stupid like "If we had evidence that found Trump innocent, we would have said so."
2) All he had was already in the report.
3) He knew in the beginning that he COULD NOT indict a sitting president...so he basically wasted time for 2 years for innuendo's sake.
He said "there's nothing in the report beyond what is in the report." Now he attempts to make 'changes'...no wonder he doesn't want to testify to Congress.
4) Mullet lied. He told Barr that the whole "COULD NOT indict a sitting president" thing did NOT factor into his decision (or lack of). Now he says it DID.
5) The only connection to Russians was the dossier...which he conveniently ignored.
6) Just more wordy red meat for the media to twist into a shape that they like.
CORRECT BOTTOM LINE:
If we were confident that we had evidence that found Trump guilty, we would have said so."
Sarah Sanders
Verified account @PressSec
27m27 minutes ago
White House Statement on Mueller statement today:
2) All he had was already in the report.
3) He knew in the beginning that he COULD NOT indict a sitting president...so he basically wasted time for 2 years for innuendo's sake.
He said "there's nothing in the report beyond what is in the report." Now he attempts to make 'changes'...no wonder he doesn't want to testify to Congress.
4) Mullet lied. He told Barr that the whole "COULD NOT indict a sitting president" thing did NOT factor into his decision (or lack of). Now he says it DID.
5) The only connection to Russians was the dossier...which he conveniently ignored.
6) Just more wordy red meat for the media to twist into a shape that they like.
CORRECT BOTTOM LINE:
If we were confident that we had evidence that found Trump guilty, we would have said so."
Sarah Sanders
Verified account @PressSec
27m27 minutes ago
White House Statement on Mueller statement today:
Educate yourself, idiot.
Obstruction of Justice
18 U.S.C. § 1503 defines "obstruction of justice" as an act that "corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice."
Barr didn't create the OPINIONS for the Justice Department regarding a sitting President you dumb twat.
evince
Truthmatters
1) Mullet said it backwards on purpose. No one says something stupid like "If we had evidence that found Trump innocent, we would have said so."
2) All he had was already in the report.
3) He knew in the beginning that he COULD NOT indict a sitting president...so he basically wasted time for 2 years for innuendo's sake.
He said "there's nothing in the report beyond what is in the report." Now he attempts to make 'changes'...no wonder he doesn't want to testify to Congress.
4) Mullet lied. He told Barr that the whole "COULD NOT indict a sitting president" thing did NOT factor into his decision (or lack of). Now he says it DID.
5) The only connection to Russians was the dossier...which he conveniently ignored.
6) Just more wordy red meat for the media to twist into a shape that they like.
CORRECT BOTTOM LINE:
If we were confident that we had evidence that found Trump guilty, we would have said so."
Sarah Sanders
Verified account @PressSec
27m27 minutes ago
White House Statement on Mueller statement today:
what a load of mouthpooping from an idiot who embraces lies over fact and party over country
What did he do on TV that constituted obstruction you dumb twat? If we set the bar as low as the morons in the Party of the Jackass want to set it for Trump; NO President will be safe from partisan bullshit.
evince
Truthmatters
I didn't say he did you dead mule fucker
who is the boss at DOJ
who would be able to determine how the DOJ would see it ?
the boss huh
Not Mueller
Superfreak
Verified User
That is a very precise description of what you do.
1) Mullet said it backwards on purpose. No one says something stupid like "If we had evidence that found Trump innocent, we would have said so."
2) All he had was already in the report.
3) He knew in the beginning that he COULD NOT indict a sitting president...so he basically wasted time for 2 years for innuendo's sake.
He said "there's nothing in the report beyond what is in the report." Now he attempts to make 'changes'...no wonder he doesn't want to testify to Congress.
4) Mullet lied. He told Barr that the whole "COULD NOT indict a sitting president" thing did NOT factor into his decision (or lack of). Now he says it DID.
5) The only connection to Russians was the dossier...which he conveniently ignored.
6) Just more wordy red meat for the media to twist into a shape that they like.
CORRECT BOTTOM LINE:
If we were confident that we had evidence that found Trump guilty, we would have said so."
Sarah Sanders
Verified account @PressSec
27m27 minutes ago
White House Statement on Mueller statement today:
You pathetic, repugnant cunt; NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.
evince
Truthmatters
1) Mullet said it backwards on purpose. No one says something stupid like "If we had evidence that found Trump innocent, we would have said so."
2) All he had was already in the report.
3) He knew in the beginning that he COULD NOT indict a sitting president...so he basically wasted time for 2 years for innuendo's sake.
He said "there's nothing in the report beyond what is in the report." Now he attempts to make 'changes'...no wonder he doesn't want to testify to Congress.
4) Mullet lied. He told Barr that the whole "COULD NOT indict a sitting president" thing did NOT factor into his decision (or lack of). Now he says it DID.
5) The only connection to Russians was the dossier...which he conveniently ignored.
6) Just more wordy red meat for the media to twist into a shape that they like.
CORRECT BOTTOM LINE:
If we were confident that we had evidence that found Trump guilty, we would have said so."
Sarah Sanders
Verified account @PressSec
27m27 minutes ago
White House Statement on Mueller statement today:
Sarah lies. Just like you are. There are 10 instances of obstruction.
Mueller didn't say there was no evidence of conspiracy. He said there was "insufficient evidence". Two different things.
His statement is clear. “If we had confidence the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.” What about that do you not understand?
The rest of your post is babbling illiterate bullshit. Not worth responding to.
Not a waste of time. Look who is in prison. Trump's inner circle. Mueller set a roadmap for impeachment. Now, it's up to Congress to pick up the ball and continue their investigations that can convince the Senate cowards.
That is a laughably moronic and idiotic claim. He said something that was fucking funny and you morons run with it making incredibly lunatic claims that he was inviting the Russians to hack. You fucking dumb twat; Obama was in charge, not Trump. It was a fucking JOKE that resounded with his constituents.
Dumb lunatic twat.
A brain dead partisan hack stuck on moron. 
Babbling double-speak. You understand nothing. You've bought the red meat.
Insufficient evidence = innocent.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
Either it is a rule or it isn't. Was the rule in place when Muller started?
Look just get on with impeachment already. We want you to