Which is ALREADY the LAW. Feel free to disarm yourself...I agree that you should.
Move to Red China Cuba or Venezuela...you agree with them on many things!!
#yourparadiseonEarth
"At least 11 dead in Virginia Beach mass shooting at municipal center"
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
Which is ALREADY the LAW. Feel free to disarm yourself...I agree that you should.
Move to Red China Cuba or Venezuela...you agree with them on many things!!
#yourparadiseonEarth
It would have INDISPTUABLY GIVEN THEM A CHANCE THAT THE LAW-ABIDING DID NOT HAVE in a "GUN FREE (except for criminals) ZONE"...
Repeating the lie doesn't make it true.
The stated purpose of the 2nd Amendment was to ensure that future generations could follow in the footsteps of our REVOLUTIONARY Founders and overthrow the federal government if (when) it became adversarial to our rights and interests. Idiot liberal butchery of the 2nd Amendment would leave the citizenry drastically outgunned by the federal government, thus making revolution impossible.
Your ignorant assertions are literally provably false. Try again.
Last edited:
That was a good movie. Not many are that familiar with it.
No it isn't, current gun laws are a joke, anyone who really wants a weapon can get a weapon
I don't do guns, not a girlee man, and the majority of Americans agree with the way I do, they want something done on guns
Is true, 100% true, even Scalia comfirmed such in the majority opinion in the Heller case, and all the quotes from some NRA propaganda doesn't prove it otherwise
Doubtful, from my experience those carrying guns are more of a threat than anyone not packing. All the gun huggers see themselves as Chuck Norris and John Wayne when Barny Fife is more appropriate
Turns out AT that once again I was right. And you are still a dumb fuck.
I doubt Scalia said anything that could even be misinterpreted by you to mean something so provably false, but SCOTUS tramples the Constitution more than almost anyone, so it doesn't matter either way.
And the Founding Fathers are now NRA propaganda? Nice logic, uneducated one.
Here's Alexander Hamilton saying you are an uninformed idiot in Federalist 28:
Here's James Madison saying you are an uninformed idiot in Federalist 46:
I can go on, but you are clearly not interested in telling the truth.
Last edited:
Liberal Lie: The 2nd Amendment only protects the right of the states to maintain militias, rather than the right of individuals to bear arms.
-Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution already provides for the existence of such militias. There would be no reason for the 2nd Amendment to exist if this were correct.
-When the Framers drafted the Bill of Rights, they went out of their way to specify “The People” when talking about the rights of the individual and “The States” when talking about the rights of state governments. For liberals to be correct on this, the 2nd Amendment (‘the right of The People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed’) would have to be the only place in the entire document in which the meanings were reversed.
-The term “well-regulated” in 1789 meant correctly-calibrated and properly formed. There is abundant evidence of this and it is beyond dispute. When the first part of the 2nd Amendment justifies gun rights by explaining, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state…,” it is clarifying that you cannot have the kind of disciplined and well-trained citizen militias necessary to repel foreign invasions, put down unrest, and resist government tyranny without an armed populace. This was made unmistakably clear by Alexander Hamilton’s discussion of militias in Federalist 29, and by the original wording of the 2nd Amendment:
“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; a well armed and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country.”
But liberals deliberately misrepresent the 2nd Amendment’s wording to argue that the Founders (who used armed revolution to overthrow the government) only actually supported the right of states to operate their own government-controlled militias, despite them being on the record emphatically stating the opposite. These would be the same Founding Fathers who made it a requirement that every citizen own a firearm at one point.
Liberals also cite examples of armed rebellions that were put down by George Washington as proof that our Founders never intended for us to be able to take up arms against federal tyranny. But this flies in the face of everything we know about the Founding Fathers, who talked routinely about refreshing the “tree of liberty” with the “blood of patriots and tyrants,” and who enthusiastically embraced such rights in no uncertain terms in the Declaration of Independence.
Yet again, like the rest of the Bill of Rights, the 2nd Amendment was drafted specifically to convince New York and Virginia that this new Federal Government we were creating would never be able to trample their Natural Right to self-rule as an armed, free people. The Founding Fathers had no illusions about the tyrannical inclinations of government, and they enshrined gun rights in the Constitution as a protection of the states and The People against the Federal Government for the clear and stated purpose of armed resistance to tyranny.
This is an undeniable fact that liberals simply choose to lie about non-stop…as with everything else they say about the Constitution.
-Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution already provides for the existence of such militias. There would be no reason for the 2nd Amendment to exist if this were correct.
-When the Framers drafted the Bill of Rights, they went out of their way to specify “The People” when talking about the rights of the individual and “The States” when talking about the rights of state governments. For liberals to be correct on this, the 2nd Amendment (‘the right of The People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed’) would have to be the only place in the entire document in which the meanings were reversed.
-The term “well-regulated” in 1789 meant correctly-calibrated and properly formed. There is abundant evidence of this and it is beyond dispute. When the first part of the 2nd Amendment justifies gun rights by explaining, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state…,” it is clarifying that you cannot have the kind of disciplined and well-trained citizen militias necessary to repel foreign invasions, put down unrest, and resist government tyranny without an armed populace. This was made unmistakably clear by Alexander Hamilton’s discussion of militias in Federalist 29, and by the original wording of the 2nd Amendment:
“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; a well armed and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country.”
But liberals deliberately misrepresent the 2nd Amendment’s wording to argue that the Founders (who used armed revolution to overthrow the government) only actually supported the right of states to operate their own government-controlled militias, despite them being on the record emphatically stating the opposite. These would be the same Founding Fathers who made it a requirement that every citizen own a firearm at one point.
Liberals also cite examples of armed rebellions that were put down by George Washington as proof that our Founders never intended for us to be able to take up arms against federal tyranny. But this flies in the face of everything we know about the Founding Fathers, who talked routinely about refreshing the “tree of liberty” with the “blood of patriots and tyrants,” and who enthusiastically embraced such rights in no uncertain terms in the Declaration of Independence.
Yet again, like the rest of the Bill of Rights, the 2nd Amendment was drafted specifically to convince New York and Virginia that this new Federal Government we were creating would never be able to trample their Natural Right to self-rule as an armed, free people. The Founding Fathers had no illusions about the tyrannical inclinations of government, and they enshrined gun rights in the Constitution as a protection of the states and The People against the Federal Government for the clear and stated purpose of armed resistance to tyranny.
This is an undeniable fact that liberals simply choose to lie about non-stop…as with everything else they say about the Constitution.
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
Turns out, once again you are an asshole!
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
Your whole family carries concealed? What are ya, a bunch of paranoid scaredy-cats? LOL!
Let's just hope one of you don't shoot yourself- or one another in the ass! BLAHAHAHAHA!
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
We have all the gun regulation we need.
What other regulation would have prevented this?
I don’t enjoy these deaths like you do. You don’t care about innocent deaths. You merely want to exploit their deaths for your political gain
Spell out specifically what “sensible gun regulation” you want that would have prevented what happened at Virginia Beach and we can discuss.
Otherwise STFU
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
Constitution doesn’t say that so........
Trust me. Had there been armed people in that building, it would not have happened.
It’s funny my gun range has never been shot up by some deranged leftist like you. Wonder why that is?
Oh yeah. People in there can shoot back.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
How are those gun free zones working out for ya?
As any fool can see, its that you are free to do it.
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
Notice he stopped when Policemen who are actually trained and paid to take down those kinds of deadly threats showed up!
Funny how the system works without you untrained gun-toters, still dreaming for that opportunity to kill a black man somewhere, intruding onto the scene like Barney Fife, and risking getting even more innocent people killed through friendly fire etc!
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
He would have stopped sooner had someone there had a gun
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
There were civilians there with guns.......
.......The police found them hiding safely there in the women's powder room! BLAHAHAHAHAHA!
Your god knew it would happen. Millions of years ago. Correct?