Poll: More support impeaching Trump than Nixon at start of Watergate

LV426 said:
My mistake, I was searching the entire phrase on document cloud.

However, "did not establish" doesn't mean "cleared and exonerated".
Click to expand...

LMAO. So you admit you are an idiot for calling me a liar?

Good to know.

Yes, if you don't have enough evidence to charge someone, they are indeed cleared. This moronic concept of guilty until proven 100% innocent that Mueller is going with goes against how our judicial system works.
 
LV426 said:
I have read Volume I, I was just searching your entire quote in document cloud and because you didn't quote it accurately, it didn't come up when searched.

Secondly, Volume I establishes several instances of Conservatives and Trump folks colluding with Russia...so this narrow thing you're trying to say clears Trump doesn't actually clear him. It doesn't make him or any of his people guilty either, but it doesn't exonerate them.
Click to expand...

I didn't quote it accurately? I cut and paste it from the document. So unless the NY Times altered it, then it is accurate.
 
LV426 said:
I have read Volume I, I was just searching your entire quote in document cloud and because you didn't quote it accurately, it didn't come up when searched.

Secondly, Volume I establishes several instances of Conservatives and Trump folks colluding with Russia...so this narrow thing you're trying to say clears Trump doesn't actually clear him. It doesn't make him or any of his people guilty either, but it doesn't exonerate them.
Click to expand...


you are one troubled little nut**bag aren't you cupcake? :rofl2:

spend the next 6 years of your life under TDS, it's an affliction with no known cure, cutting years off of your pitiful life though
 
LV426 said:
I have read Volume I, I was just searching your entire quote in document cloud and because you didn't quote it accurately, it didn't come up when searched.

Secondly, Volume I establishes several instances of Conservatives and Trump folks colluding with Russia...so this narrow thing you're trying to say clears Trump doesn't actually clear him. It doesn't make him or any of his people guilty either, but it doesn't exonerate them.
Click to expand...

LMAO... no, Volume I does not establish instances of them colluding with Russia. That is precisely why the report stated "the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
 
LV426 said:
I have read Volume I, I was just searching your entire quote in document cloud and because you didn't quote it accurately, it didn't come up when searched.

Secondly, Volume I establishes several instances of Conservatives and Trump folks colluding with Russia...so this narrow thing you're trying to say clears Trump doesn't actually clear him. It doesn't make him or any of his people guilty either, but it doesn't exonerate them.
Click to expand...

Quote the section you are referring to. List the page number etc... just as I did.
 
Superfreak said:
"the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
Click to expand...

Did not establish doesn't mean "cleared".

Because of this:

Separately, on August 2, 2016, Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort met in New York City with his long-time business associate Konstantin Kilimnik, who the FBI assesses to have ties to Russian Intelligence. Kilimnik requested the meeting to deliver in person a peace plan for Ukraine that Manafort acknowledged to the Special Counsel?s Of?ce was a backdoor way for Russia to control part of eastern Ukraine; both men believed the plan would require candidate Trump's assent to succeed (were he to be elected President). They also discussed the status of the Trump Campaign and Manafort's strategy for winning Democratic votes in Midwestern states. Months before that meeting, Manafort had caused internal polling data to be shared with Kilimnik, and the sharing continued for some period of time after their August meeting.

So that's not direct coordination with Russia to interfere in the elections, but it is collusion because Manafort shared the polling data with Russia in order to target voters in key states.
 
Superfreak said:
LMAO... no, Volume I does not establish instances of them colluding with Russia.
Click to expand...

Yes it does.

Literally from the same page where you pulled that quote:

Separately, on August 2, 2016, Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort met in New York City with his long-time business associate Konstantin Kilimnik, who the FBI assesses to have ties to RussianI ntelligence. Kilimnik requested the meeting to deliver in person a peace plan for Ukraine that Manafort acknowledged to the Special Counsel's Office was a backdoor way for Russia to control part of eastern Ukraine; both men believed the plan would require candidate Trump's assent to succeed (were he to be elected President). They also discussed the status of the Trump Campaign and Manafort?s strategy for winning Democratic votes in Midwestern states. Months before that meeting, Manafort had caused internal polling data to be shared with Kilimnik, and the sharing continued for some period of time after their August meeting.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955118-The-Mueller-Report.html
 
Superfreak said:
Quote the section you are referring to. List the page number etc... just as I did.
Click to expand...

Well, one instance was literally from the page from where you quoted:

Separately, on August 2, 2016, Drumpf campaign chairman Paul Manafort met in New York City with his long-time business associate Konstantin Kilimnik, who the FBI assesses to have ties to Russian Intelligence. Kilimnik requested the meeting to deliver in person a peace plan for Ukraine that Manafort acknowledged to the Special Counsel's Office was a backdoor way for Russia to control part of eastern Ukraine; both men believed the plan would require candidate Drumpf's assent to succeed (were he to be elected President). They also discussed the status of the Drumpf Campaign and Manafort's strategy for winning Democratic votes in Midwestern states. Months before that meeting, Manafort had caused internal polling data to be shared with Kilimnik, and the sharing continued for some period of time after their August meeting.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955118-The-Mueller-Report.html

So Manafort had been colluding with Russia for a long time.
 
Superfreak said:
This moronic concept of guilty until proven 100% innocent that Mueller is going with goes against how our judicial system works.
Click to expand...

Then let's hold Impeachment hearings, and you guys can defend all the shit you did that Mueller lays out in his report.
 
Getin the ring said:
you are one troubled little nut**bag aren't you cupcake? :rofl2:

spend the next 6 years of your life under TDS, it's an affliction with no known cure, cutting years off of your pitiful life though
Click to expand...

When Trump loses next year, I believe you will delete this account and create a brand new one that distances from Trump because of how embarrassing it is for you; just like you did after Bush when you stapled a bunch of teabags to your face to convince us you cared about debt.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top