Poll: More support impeaching Trump than Nixon at start of Watergate

DUMBER IQ of 76 said:
Liar.

“As set forth in the report, after the investigation, if we had confidence that the president did not clearly commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”
Click to expand...

Dumb fuck:

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
 
Bill said:
Agreed, it would be a political calculation, one that pelosi, hopefully, would not make on her own..

I often hear this or that will fire up his base, anyone not think they are already fired up??

Like a picador he pokes them almost daily to keep them a notch or two below a frenzy...

I honestly don't think him being impeached is going to change any of them, they can only vote once, ~or "so" if you are in certain parts of the south..

It may cause indi etc to shun their party though if they believe/feel the dems did it exclusively for political or frivolous reasons..

One could prob argue it would further divide the country as well, but we seem to be on a path that is going to make that inevitable...
Click to expand...

Does it occur to any of you delusional liars that the majority of Democrats in the House do not support impeachment. Dunce.
 
DUMBER IQ of 76 said:
I just referenced the source, ignorant shitstain.

Volume 2, Mueller report.

Are you that fucking lazy/stupid that you can’t look that up?
Click to expand...

^^Triggered dumb fuck. :laugh:

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.
 
Hello Cinnabar,

Cinnabar said:
The reality TV optics would be poetic justice and would take the racketeer down. All of Trump's crimes would be out there for the world to see. Pelosi do what The Constitution demands you do already!
Click to expand...

He should be impeached but we should make sure we have all the evidence to really put him away. I think Pelosi is very smart. She wants to wait until it is a sure thing. Bring her the evidence!
 
StoneByStone said:
Actually, younger people are willing to change our minds when we realize we're wrong. Older people have held on to their wrong ideas for so long, they can't stand to part with them.
Click to expand...

LOL... that is nonsense. There are many millennials who think they know it all that refuse to listen to anything other than their echo chambers.
 
TTQ64 said:
3 million more people voted for Clinton.

dump was selected by racist white men who cheated for the GOPigs like they have been doing for decades.
Click to expand...

Learn how our system works. It is not a nationwide popular vote. It is a STATE wide popular vote. With all but two states winner take all.
 
liberals are all talk

I welcome impeachment. it will help trump, and at the very least be incredibly entertaining. You'll also lose a large swath of america forever.

but you wont do any of that because as I said, liberals are all talk, they are beta pussies that are too scared to follow through with what they believe. so you guys wont actually do anything.

I dare you guys.
 
TTQ64 said:
Still can't name a dem who can lose to dump?
Click to expand...

Who can beat him that is currently running? Warren can't. Mayor Pete can't. Harris can't. Gillibrand cant. Booker can't.

Biden, Sanders... maybe... but even they are weak candidates.

Hickenlooper is probably the better of the Dem candidates, but I don't think he will gain traction.
 
Superfreak said:
I have read it
Click to expand...

No you haven't.


No collusion/conspiracy with Russians by any American.
Click to expand...

Not what the report says at all, which is how I know you're lying about reading it.

The report says they couldn't establish criminal collusion, but they established plenty of good, old fashioned, regular collusion.

Like Paul Manafort sharing GOP polling data with Russian assets. That's collusion.

In fact, Volume I details the Russian attacks and how Americans were involved and the support certain Americans gave.

He also talks about how GOP Congressional Candidates solicited help from Russian assets for their campaigns. That was in an actual indictment.
 
STME said:
liberals are all talk

I welcome impeachment. it will help trump, and at the very least be incredibly entertaining. You'll also lose a large swath of america forever.

but you wont do any of that because as I said, liberals are all talk, they are beta pussies that are too scared to follow through with what they believe. so you guys wont actually do anything.

I dare you guys.
Click to expand...

I think deep down they know how bad they will look continuing down the path towards impeachment. But they have so riled the moronic lemmings they need to vote that they are stuck between a rock and a hard place.

That is why the weakest Dem candidates are screaming to impeach... to gain attention. The slightly less weak dem candidates are 'on the fence'.
 
LV426 said:
No you haven't.




Not what the report says at all, which is how I know you're lying about reading it.

The report says they couldn't establish criminal collusion, but they established plenty of good, old fashioned, regular collusion.

Like Paul Manafort sharing GOP polling data with Russian assets. That's collusion.

In fact, Volume I details the Russian attacks and how Americans were involved and the support certain Americans gave.

He also talks about how GOP Congressional Candidates solicited help from Russian assets for their campaigns. That was in an actual indictment.
Click to expand...

LMAO... no, it does not state that in the least.

But do post the page reference you think says that.
 
LV426 said:
No you haven't.




Not what the report says at all, which is how I know you're lying about reading it.

The report says they couldn't establish criminal collusion, but they established plenty of good, old fashioned, regular collusion.

Like Paul Manafort sharing GOP polling data with Russian assets. That's collusion.

In fact, Volume I details the Russian attacks and how Americans were involved and the support certain Americans gave.

He also talks about how GOP Congressional Candidates solicited help from Russian assets for their campaigns. That was in an actual indictment.
Click to expand...

"the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
 
LV426 said:
No you haven't.




Not what the report says at all, which is how I know you're lying about reading it.

The report says they couldn't establish criminal collusion, but they established plenty of good, old fashioned, regular collusion.

Like Paul Manafort sharing GOP polling data with Russian assets. That's collusion.

In fact, Volume I details the Russian attacks and how Americans were involved and the support certain Americans gave.

He also talks about how GOP Congressional Candidates solicited help from Russian assets for their campaigns. That was in an actual indictment.
Click to expand...

"The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the IRA."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top