Poll: More support impeaching Trump than Nixon at start of Watergate

domer76 said:
:lolup::rofl2:

I’ve quoted the report for you morons more times than I can count. I’ve provided the entire text. I’ve qouted Meuller directly. But your stubborn, blind, willful ignorance is getting in your way. Your lack of reading comprehension doesn’t help, either.

You are a complete dumbfuck, halfwit. No two ways about it.
Click to expand...
What you quoted does nothing to substantiate your claim. No matter how many times you repeat it or use juvenile insults.
 
domer76 said:
“So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”

“As set forth in the report, after the investigation, if we had confidence that the president did not clearly commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”
Click to expand...

In other words inconclusive
 
domer76 said:
“So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”

“As set forth in the report, after the investigation, if we had confidence that the president did not clearly commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”
Click to expand...

.."this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime".........
 
domer76 said:
As I said, you remain stubbornly and willfully ignorant.

Only you can fix that. I just provide the facts.

Halfwit:rofl2:
Click to expand...

At least these willfully ignorant traitors have been exposed to the facts, unlike the rest of Fox nation who have no idea
even of the headnotes.

Hey stupid fucking rubes, Mueller made a statement because he KNOWS your MASTER and FAKE NEWS outlet FOX
lies to you about basic facts.

If he didn't come out and UNsummarize what Barr lied about, you would still be screaming "exonerated" just because the fat hideous orange marsupial said so.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
.."this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime".........
Click to expand...

I can’t fix your willfully ignorant illiteracy.

So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”

“As set forth in the report, after the investigation, if we had confidence that the president did not clearly commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”
“
 
Micawber said:
At least these willfully ignorant traitors have been exposed to the facts, unlike the rest of Fox nation who have no idea
even of the headnotes.

Hey stupid fucking rubes, Mueller made a statement because he KNOWS your MASTER and FAKE NEWS outlet FOX
lies to you about basic facts.

If he didn't come out and UNsummarize what Barr lied about, you would still be screaming "exonerated" just because the fat hideous orange marsupial said so.
Click to expand...

It has done no good, though, has it?

They remain as ignorant as if they had seen nothing.
 
domer76 said:
It has done no good, though, has it?

They remain as ignorant as if they had seen nothing.
Click to expand...

It's done good. You hammer and hammer and eventually the boulder breaks. The fissures are imperceptible but contribute.
This was a big stroke. I'm glad he did it. Took courage to break with party. He had 1/2 sufficient courage. Better than I expected.
The ones here who shout denials at you are simply lying but know to themselves Trump is a criminal. Now they are more convinced.
Important rightees need to turn on trump for the Lemmings to follow. They need a low risk reason to attack and abandon him.
The heat should turn up if some attractive challenger comes along.
 
domer76 said:
10 instances of obstruction.

“As set forth in the report, after the investigation, if we had confidence that the president did not clearly commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”
Click to expand...

Here is Trump in the act of an 11th instances of obstruction:

ssWHaVi.jpg
 
domer76 said:
I can’t fix your willfully ignorant illiteracy.

So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.”

“As set forth in the report, after the investigation, if we had confidence that the president did not clearly commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”
“
Click to expand...

and obviously, if they had confidence that the president committed a crime they would have said so.......they did not........
 
PostmodernProphet said:
and obviously, if they had confidence that the president committed a crime they would have said so.......they did not........
Click to expand...

Nope, just the opposite was said, illiterate fuck.

As set forth in the report, after the investigation, if we had confidence that the president did not clearly commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”
 
Micawber said:
It's done good. You hammer and hammer and eventually the boulder breaks. The fissures are imperceptible but contribute.
This was a big stroke. I'm glad he did it. Took courage to break with party. He had 1/2 sufficient courage. Better than I expected.
The ones here who shout denials at you are simply lying but know to themselves Trump is a criminal. Now they are more convinced.
Important rightees need to turn on trump for the Lemmings to follow. They need a low risk reason to attack and abandon him.
The heat should turn up if some attractive challenger comes along.
Click to expand...


I wonder how much of his courage will be revealed as everything is being declassified and sorted out? Attractive challenger??? :) (too funny)
 
In America, insufficent proof to pursue obstruction means that you are innocent.

The bedrock of American jurisprudence, innocent until proven guilty.
 
Earl said:
In America, insufficent proof to pursue obstruction means that you are innocent.
Click to expand...

Where does it say that in criminal statutes?

Also, this isn't a regular court of law; this is a Special Counsel investigation and an upcoming Impeachment proceeding.
 
Earl said:
The bedrock of American jurisprudence, innocent until proven guilty.
Click to expand...

So then let's go to impeachment and the GOP and Trump can defend themselves against Mueller's report.

Do you really, really, really think this GOP and Donald Trump have the will, savvy, and restraint to survive impeachment? Cuz I don't.

What will happen is Trump will go insane and start attacking everyone, thus blowing up the GOP ahead of 2020.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top