Despite Foreign Threats, Senate Republicans Block $250 Million for Election Security

[StoneByStone]

Well, duh. Their guy can't win without Russia.

https://www.governing.com/topics/politics/Despite-Foreign-Threats-Senate-Republicans-Block-250-Million-for-Election-Security.html

 

[TOP]

Well, duh. Their guy can't win without Russia.

https://www.governing.com/topics/politics/Despite-Foreign-Threats-Senate-Republicans-Block-250-Million-for-Election-Security.html

I keep hearing about this Russia "help" being the reason Hillary lost...How did that work?

 

[Jack]

Why would anyone oppose Election security?

 

[TOP]

Why would anyone oppose Election security?

Why would an extra 250 million be necessary? There's already 380 mill... and still $$ left over from 2018....how is that not sufficient ?

 

[StoneByStone]

I keep hearing about this Russia "help" being the reason Hillary lost...How did that work?

Well, the candidate Russia helped won, so..... pretty well.

 

[Jack]

Why would an extra 250 million be necessary? There's already 380 mill... and still $$ left over from 2018....how is that not sufficient ?

Somebody must think there is a problem?

 

[TOP]

Well, the candidate Russia helped won, so..... pretty well.

So, how did that work?

 

[StoneByStone]

So, how did that work?

I just answered you. Trump won, so it worked well. And Russia will probably help him win again.

 

[TOP]

Somebody must think there is a problem?

and some must think not...
Grant money....I can just imagine how that would be "spent"....

 

[Jack]

and some must think not...
Grant money....I can just imagine how that would be "spent"....

I like having a 'paper trail'.
I like preventing 'hacking'.

 

[TOP]

I just answered you. Trump won, so it worked well. And Russia will probably help him win again.

I asked how...If you believe that, surely you must know....If not, just say so....

 

[Airstrip One]

Well, the candidate Russia helped won, so..... pretty well.

Not really. They must not have given Christopher Steele enough data.

 

[TOP]

I like having a 'paper trail'.
I like preventing 'hacking'.

380million isn't enough for some paper? To avoid "hacking"?

 

[Airstrip One]

Why would anyone oppose Election security?

Why would anyone oppose voter ID?

 

[Jack]

380million isn't enough for some paper? To avoid "hacking"?

Is that what we have now?

 

[Jack]

Why would anyone oppose voter ID?

I don't know? Who opposes it? That would seem to go along with Election security.

 

[TOP]

Is that what we have now?

Yes...the 250 was "extra"....

 

[PostmodernProphet]

I just answered you. Trump won, so it worked well. And Russia will probably help him win again.

is there some kind of medal we can give them?......we should show them some appreciation......

 

[TOP]

I don't know? Who opposes it? That would seem to go along with Election security.

You wouldn't think photo ID would even be an issue, would you...? Seems like some feel that it's "unfair".... Pretty silly right?

 

[PostmodernProphet]

why spend money on polling place security when the Obama administration investigated and found that not a single vote had been tampered with........all we need to do is keep Russia from cooperating with the deep state.......