Who will support War with Iran?

Who will support War with Iran?

  • Anatta/Noise

    Votes: 3 42.9%
  • Anonymoose

    Votes: 3 42.9%
  • Bigdog

    Votes: 3 42.9%
  • Billy

    Votes: 2 28.6%
  • Countryboy

    Votes: 3 42.9%
  • Damocles

    Votes: 2 28.6%
  • Dark Soul

    Votes: 3 42.9%
  • Darth Omar

    Votes: 4 57.1%
  • Evmetro

    Votes: 3 42.9%
  • Guille

    Votes: 2 28.6%
  • ILA/Teflon Don

    Votes: 3 42.9%
  • Legion

    Votes: 4 57.1%
  • RB 60

    Votes: 3 42.9%
  • Sailor

    Votes: 3 42.9%
  • Stargazer/LiG

    Votes: 2 28.6%
  • Stretch

    Votes: 3 42.9%
  • Text Drivers are Killers

    Votes: 3 42.9%
  • Truth Detector

    Votes: 3 42.9%
  • Tomcat

    Votes: 3 42.9%
  • USFreedom911`

    Votes: 2 28.6%

  • Total voters
    7
  • Poll closed .
Here's a better poll question: Which LIBTARD is going to side with Iran, and support them in the event of a war.

Answer: All libtards on this board and in the US.
 
No, but I do feel that Iran's exportation of terrorism and threats to impede the commerce of nations friendly to us is an act of war by Iran

1. Iran feels that the US installing the Shah and overthrowing the democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran was 'terrorism'.
2. "impede the commerce of nations" is what the US is doing to Iran.
 
1. Iran feels that the US installing the Shah and overthrowing the democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran was 'terrorism'.
Or we could have let russia move in and try an Afghanistan gambit

2. "impede the commerce of nations" is what the US is doing to Iran.
This is standard American playbook stuff. It's what the left ALWAYS demands in situations like this. Sanctions, talking, more sanctions, more talking. Whats different today, at least from what I can discern, is the religious aspect. As long as those mullahs are ate up with the fire of allah, it's gonna be like trying to negotiate with a great white shark(they don't listen very well)
 
Or we could have let russia move in and try an Afghanistan gambit


This is standard American playbook stuff. It's what the left ALWAYS demands in situations like this. Sanctions, talking, more sanctions, more talking. Whats different today, at least from what I can discern, is the religious aspect. As long as those mullahs are ate up with the fire of allah, it's gonna be like trying to negotiate with a great white shark(they don't listen very well)

1. We could have actually put 'democracy' before 'oil'.
2. The US had a Nuke Deal with Iran.
 
Who needs a "war" with Iran?

Reagan COMPLETLY nullified their JOKE of a "NAVY" in one weekend...no "war" necessary...just a few limited strikes.


Trump can do the same....even more easily.
 
1. We could have actually put 'democracy' before 'oil'.

Very little to do with oil in 1953, except maybe for the UK. For the US, it was more about early warning radar stations and listening outposts. And didn't mob rule...er, I mean "democracy"come on the scene in 1979?(of course, it came in the form of a religious revolution, which ALWAYS ushers in freedom, right?)

[2. The US had a Nuke Deal with Iran.

That wasn't a "deal". That was a capitulation from the mullah in the white house who was pissing his pants in fear(or maybe in cahoots with the mullahs in Tehran)
 
Back
Top