he served, you didn't, that's a pretty basic answer to a really triggered disrespectful question.
He "served" by sitting at a desk and staring at a monitor.
It's not like he was the vanguard in an assault on a Taliban stronghold.
Slow your roll....
he served, you didn't, that's a pretty basic answer to a really triggered disrespectful question.
Sure ya were...
Lie.Well, you're a fucking idiot who was so dumb, you got conned by a reality TV show host,
Bulverism fallacy.so what the fuck do you know?
Lie.Secondly, you are maintaining that action of "measuring" is a violation of your rights,
Lie.but you don't explain how,
Lie.and you don't even quote the part of the bill that you claim does it.
Inversion fallacy.Instead, you lazily copy-and-pasted something from someone else,
represented it as yours,
and then tried to fake your way through it because you don't think for yourself;
you just repeat what other people tell you because you're lazy.
Already did. Lie.You can't even cite the language in the bill that you say does what it does.
Already did. Lie.How come you can't do that? Here's the bill, cite the language in the bill that takes your freedumb away.
I served too, and here you are trolling us both.
He "served" by sitting at a desk and staring at a monitor.
It's not like he was the vanguard in an assault on a Taliban stronghold.
Slow your roll....
cruel world out there I guess, but we know what we are, and so too you know what you are, you tiny little thong wearing troll
You're still bragging about an election from 2016 where you came in third place, behind Clinton and Not Voted.
you think that any person in the military who wasn't in combat is worthless?
more ignorance. who do you think is going to control air traffic at forward air bases? step your stupid ass on out of here.
No.
Directing planes to land and take off is an important thing to do...but it's not the same thing as dropping into Afghanistan and attacking a stronghold.
You wouldn't equate what you did with landing at the beaches at Normandy, would you?
more of your idiocy. I didn't do radar traffic. I was a tower controller, right there on the airfield.
more of your idiocy. I didn't do radar traffic. I was a tower controller, right there on the airfield.
Oh, so now it's at forward air bases?
Thought you said that when you served, there was "no conflict"?
Your story is starting to fall apart.
There is no democratic process. We are not a democracy. The United States and each of the States are organized as republics.Yeah, because you refuse to accept the results of the democratic process.
Inversion fallacy.You're the one who wants the civil war because you're the one who doesn't want to accept the results of the election.
Contextomy fallacy.You're the one who said "elections are irrelevant".
Threat.So since you refuse to participate in the process, refuse to accept the results of that process, and threaten when you don't get your way, why the fuck should we should you any accommodation at all?
Threat.Why shouldn't the government just drop a couple MOABs on your shitty little gaggle of inbred assholes?
Here's the bill that provoked all this, cite the language that you maintain and insist "violates your freedumbs".
I dare you.
of course not.
experience in combat obviously makes someone even more effective than someone who wasn't.
but that, in no way, diminishes my knowledge and training that i've had.
OK, so then why invoke your military service? Don't get it.
But you were never in combat. You said yourself, there were no conflicts when you served. So...
I;m not saying it did...what I'm saying is you're representing your military service as something that it really isn't. Almost like you took the easiest, safest job you could just so you could say you were in the Marines.
When most people think Marines, they don't think guy sitting in an air-conditioned room, staring at a monitor, directing traffic. They think guy landing on a beach or going into a cave with weapons, looking for bad guys to kill.
Just...slow your roll.
at no time did I say I controlled traffic at forward air bases.
I only said that tower controllers would control at forward air bases, THEREFORE, they would have received some combat training.
Inversion fallacy. This is YOUR problem.So you don't recognize the government's authority to enforce laws;
We are not a democracy.this comes with you not recognizing the democratic process;
Inversion fallacy. YOUR problem again.which comes with you not recognizing the results of an election.
We are not a democracy.So...how are you defending individual freedom when you refuse to participate or acknowledge the democratic process?
So to you, Democrats winning an election is enough for you to threaten violence if they do win.
So you are the one who wants the Civil War, aren't you?