Report; Climate apartheid - the rich will survive- you won't !

[Into the Night]

Horseshit.

Argument of the stone fallacy. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth, the global sea level, the global atmospheric content of CO2, the emissivity of Earth, or the total snow and ice content on Earth.
Science does not use consensus or supporting evidence. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. It only uses conflicting evidence.

You're an attention-crazed whacko. Fuck off.

YALIF.

Hmmmmmmm- let me see now- no, I think the von GobScheissen Rectology pronouncement should make a more useful addition to your poseurs' compendium .

THAT's your explanation for the 'greenhouse effect'???

Forget my previous instruction- stick around to get your fool head stomped further. Haw, haw.............haw.

YALIF.

 

[moon]

Argument of the stone fallacy. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth, the global sea level, the global atmospheric content of CO2, the emissivity of Earth, or the total snow and ice content on Earth.
Science does not use consensus or supporting evidence. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. It only uses conflicting evidence.

YALIF.

THAT's your explanation for the 'greenhouse effect'???

YALIF.

You post like an embarrassed troll- so I admire your self-expression. Haw, haw...........haw.

 

[Into the Night]

You post like an embarrassed troll- so I admire your self-expression. Haw, haw...........haw.

Inversion fallacy.

 

[moon]

Original horseshit is one thing- horseshit by rote quite something else. Haw, haw..........haw.

 

[Getin the ring]

climate change

 

[moon]

climate change

It's what you get from a five-buck bill when buying your sun-screen. Haw, haw..........haw.

 

[Into the Night]

Original horseshit is one thing- horseshit by rote quite something else. Haw, haw..........haw.

Science isn't horseshit. Neither is mathematics. You deny both.

 

[moon]

Science isn't horseshit. Neither is mathematics. You deny both.

To the contrary- unlike you I do not deny the existence of paleoclimatology , global climate, global weather or global weather stations. You are a Denier Choir troll.

 

[Into the Night]

To the contrary- unlike you I do not deny the existence of paleoclimatology , global climate, global weather or global weather stations. You are a Denier Choir troll.

Define 'climate change'. What is the current global weather as of 7/2/19 at 2321Z? Please show your source.

 

[moon]

Global weather map.
https://earth.nullschool.net/#curre...thographic=-345.00,0.00,313/loc=56.111,-9.380
You can fuck off and sob now, you sicko moron troll. Haw, haw..........haw.

 

[Micawber]

"The earth is too big, you can't measure big stuff"- Into the night.

It's that kind of thinking that kept Church people in the dark ages for centuries. "Bring out your dead!"

 

[Into the Night]

Global weather map.
https://earth.nullschool.net/#curre...thographic=-345.00,0.00,313/loc=56.111,-9.380
You can fuck off and sob now, you sicko moron troll. Haw, haw..........haw.

Does not show the global weather. Want to try again? Describe the weather as of 7/2/19 at 2321Z.

 

[Into the Night]

"The earth is too big, you can't measure big stuff"- Into the night.

It's that kind of thinking that kept Church people in the dark ages for centuries. "Bring out your dead!"

WRONG. Inversion fallacy.

* We do not have enough thermometers to measure a global temperature.
* We do not have a reference point for measuring a global sea level.
* We do not have enough CO2 monitoring stations to measure a global atmospheric CO2 content.
* We do not have enough thermometers to measure the emissivity of Earth.

Temperature varies by as much as 20 degF per mile. This gradient is not uncommon.

To calculate ANY of these values, you must also calculate the margin of error. That is a required calculation in statistical math.

You cannot use cooked data. Data selection MUST be by randN.
You must eliminate bias in data. Time is significant. Location grouping is significant. These factors MUST be eliminated.

The raw data MUST be available and shown to eliminate the biasing factors I just mentioned.

The Church of Global Warming is the religion. It denies science. It denies mathematics. Specifically, it denies the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics, the Stefan-Boltzmann law, and Kirchoff's law. It denies statistical and probability mathematics, as well as random number mathematics.

 

[moon]

Does not show the global weather. .

Not to YOU, moron. Haw, haw.........haw.

 

[moon]

WRONG. Inversion fallacy.

* We do not have enough thermometers to measure a global temperature.
* We do not have a reference point for measuring a global sea level.
* We do not have enough CO2 monitoring stations to measure a global atmospheric CO2 content.
* We do not have enough thermometers to measure the emissivity of Earth.

Temperature varies by as much as 20 degF per mile. This gradient is not uncommon.

To calculate ANY of these values, you must also calculate the margin of error. That is a required calculation in statistical math.

You cannot use cooked data. Data selection MUST be by randN.
You must eliminate bias in data. Time is significant. Location grouping is significant. These factors MUST be eliminated.

The raw data MUST be available and shown to eliminate the biasing factors I just mentioned.

The Church of Global Warming is the religion. It denies science. It denies mathematics. Specifically, it denies the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics, the Stefan-Boltzmann law, and Kirchoff's law. It denies statistical and probability mathematics, as well as random number mathematics.

You know, complicating your stupidity merely compounds it. Haw, haw.........haw.
You're a moron. Simplicity itself.

 

[Into the Night]

Not to YOU, moron. Haw, haw.........haw.

Not to anyone, moron. Much of what this site contains is manufactured data done up in a pretty format.

Still can't describe the weather at 7/2/19 at 2321Z can you?

 

[Into the Night]

You know, complicating your stupidity merely compounds it. Haw, haw.........haw.
You're a moron. Simplicity itself.

I already know you deny math. You don't need to enhance that demonstration.

 

[moon]

Not to anyone, moron. Much of what this site contains is manufactured data done up in a pretty format.

Still can't describe the weather at 7/2/19 at 2321Z can you?

Moron. It's as up-to-date as fast as global weather stations and satellite data can feed it.
https://earth.nullschool.net/#curre...hographic=-345.00,0.00,313/loc=20.059,-33.554
If you want to know what the weather is like outside of your secure unit you can consult it. Haw, haw............haw.


No global weather ? Haw, haw, haw, haw............haw.
No paleoclimatology ? Haw, haw, haw, haw............haw.
Moron poseur.

 

[Into the Night]

Moron. It's as up-to-date as fast as global weather stations and satellite data can feed it.

Satellites are incapable of measuring absolute temperatures. The emissivity of Earth is unknown. There is no such thing as a global weather station. There is no such thing as global weather. You still can't describe the weather at 7/2/19 at 2321Z, can you?

If you want to know what the weather is like outside of your secure unit you can consult it. Haw, haw............haw.

It's wrong.

No global weather ? Haw, haw, haw, haw............haw.

Nope. No such thing.

No paleoclimatology ? Haw, haw, haw, haw............haw.

Nope. Define 'climate change'.

Moron poseur.

YALIF.

 

[moon]

Spain right now;
https://earth.nullschool.net/#curre...thographic=-345.00,0.00,313/loc=-5.203,39.005

Global weather map. Moron. Haw, haw........haw.