Report; Climate apartheid - the rich will survive- you won't !

Of course there is global climate.

None. There is no such thing as a global weather.
Paleoclimatology is the science which studies it.

Not a science. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. A theory is an explanatory argument. You have to form valid arguments to have theories. You can't even define 'climate change' or 'paleoclimatology' since it is just 'climate change' that somehow occurred in the past.
Wikipedia summarily discarded. You cannot use it as a reference. False authority fallacy.
You are a moron.
Insult fallacy.
 
Of course there is global weather.
None. What is the weather of Earth right now? Please show your source.
It manifests all over the globe according to regional climate.
Weather isn't climate. Redefinition fallacy (climate<->weather).
It is monitored by GLOBAL WEATHER stations
No such thing. No weather station can measure anything beyond it's own location. You don't have enough thermometers. The ones you are using are not uniformly distributed. They are not being read at the same time by the same authority.

You are denying mathematics now. Calculating a statistical summary REQUIRES calculating the margin of error with it. What is the margin of error?
Insufficient data. Use of cooked data, which invalidates it. You cannot use cooked data in statistical math. Selection MUST be by randN. Margin of error is not given. What is your margin of error? Please show your work.
You are a moron.
No, you are not only denying science, you are denying mathematics.
 
tell that to the people now experiencing increasing frequency of severe winter,
Define 'severe winter'. Winter comes once a year, you know. Things like snow storms, sometimes heavy, strike different places in winter.
hurricanes,
Hurricane frequency and intensity has not increased. See the National Hurricane Center data.
tornadoes,
There is no database of tornadoes due to their short duration. Did you know that both hurricanes and tornadoes require COLD air to exist?
Could you be possibly a bit more vague about this? Void argument fallacy. Droughts happen.
floods across Europe, Asia and North America.
Could you possibly be a bit more vague about this? Void argument fallacy. Floods happen.
It's in the papers and on TV and radio...you just pretend its not.
No, you just pretend these events have something to do with this mysterious 'climate change' you can't define.
And recall the incident when Hurricane's Irene and Katrina wailed on the USA,
Lots of hurricanes wailed on the USA.
and that little ditty in Louisiana where you had armed locals barring survivors from crossing into their town.
So you are describing 'climate change' as a bunch of gunmen?? WTF???? :laugh::laugh::laugh:
Don't be foolish, as science fiction has a habit of becoming science fact.
Science fiction has never become science fact, since science is not facts.
Science is a set of falsifiable theories.
...or did you ever hear of Jules Verne?
Sure. He wrote some good stuff. None of it became any theory of science.
You deny man's major contribution to the natural climate change in America that has put forth these conditions.
Define 'climate change'.

The 'conditions' you are describing are normal events.
 
May Allah reward those who name you an infidel- and forgive those who mock your stupidity.
 
You didn't ask me anything. Ask away.

OK- what is it in your sick mind that leads you to deny that the science of paleoclimatology exists ? It does exist, of course.

Also , why are there global weather stations if there is- as you stupidly claim - no global weather ? Haw, haw..........haw.
 
Back
Top