Report; Climate apartheid - the rich will survive- you won't !

Have you seen ' Invasion of the Body Snatchers ' ? The one with Jeff Goldblum in the Turkish mud-bath ? Goddam brilliant - a classic.
Anyway- when did yours get snatched ?
 
moon said:
I'll try again;
Can you explain what paleoclimatology is?

Of course, I know that the science totally undermines your bird-brained Denier Choir Duet- that's why I'm asking you. I want EVERYBODY to see you attempt to remove an entire established science from the record so that they have no doubts whatsoever that you are here to peddle quackery. Haw, haw.......................haw.
Click to expand...

Paleoclimatologists use proxy evidence to reveal historical climate data. This study shows that the Arctic was far warmer 9 thousand years ago.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0959683617715701
 
Last edited:
Now he's discovered anthropology. You have a broad mind, maggot.

It's always full of broads. Haw, haw..............haw.
 
Havana Moon said:
Paleoclimatologists use proxy evidence to reveal historical climate data. This study shows that the Arctic was far warmer 9 thousand years ago.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0959683617715701
Click to expand...

Science does not use proxy data. Measurements must be direct in science. Proxy data requires the use of wild conclusions and unproven relationships.

Paleoclimatology is just another way of saying 'climate change'. Neither mean anything. There is no historic 'climate data'. There is no such thing as a global climate. There is no such thing as a global weather.

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Artic or the Earth.
 
Last edited:
moon said:
The Denier Choir perform to obfuscate, confuse, deceive and delay because they believe that their wealth will protect them from the ravages of the forthcoming climatic disaster which has been brought about by their own defending of their own Mammonist endeavours. As for YOU- well, fuck you. It's your own fault if you cannot pay to protect yourself and your family from the catastrophe they have created.

What we need NOW is for the statute book to register the crime of ecocide. The corporations and individuals who contribute the most to the detriment of our shared environment must be penalized and their ill-gotten wealth used to repair our planet . Wakey, wakey. They are the enemy- and they try to divert your anger towards foreign entities whose people are threatened by climatic ruination just like you
Click to expand...

You poor thing. There will be cataclysmic heat on this earth one day where the entire planet will be incinerated while you sit in a room
fiddling with your thermostat as you and whoever is left here turn to ashes where you stand. And THAT will be the only change in
the climate this old world will ever see.
Peace. Out. :cool:
 
When I was a kid, I loved all those "post-apocalyptic" sci-fi movies where the survivors struggled against mutants, monsters, a ravaged environment, or to reach another planet as problems beset their space ship/station.

As I got older, I realized that if such a thing were to happen, I wouldn't be one of those survivors. And more recent sci-fi movies reflect my sentiments, were it's painfully obvious that there is a economic caste system in the domed city or as to who got onto that space ship or life boat.


Sadly, the vast majority of the dummies who support climate denial don't realize that the bouncer won't have their name on the list.
 
Taichiliberal said:
When I was a kid, I loved all those "post-apocalyptic" sci-fi movies where the survivors struggled against mutants, monsters, a ravaged environment, or to reach another planet as problems beset their space ship/station.

As I got older, I realized that if such a thing were to happen, I wouldn't be one of those survivors. And more recent sci-fi movies reflect my sentiments, were it's painfully obvious that there is a economic caste system in the domed city or as to who got onto that space ship or life boat.


Sadly, the vast majority of the dummies who support climate denial don't realize that the bouncer won't have their name on the list.
Click to expand...

Haw, haw, haw, haw.............Haw. Very good.


Hell has no such selection process.
 
Taichiliberal said:
When I was a kid, I loved all those "post-apocalyptic" sci-fi movies where the survivors struggled against mutants, monsters, a ravaged environment, or to reach another planet as problems beset their space ship/station.

As I got older, I realized that if such a thing were to happen, I wouldn't be one of those survivors. And more recent sci-fi movies reflect my sentiments, were it's painfully obvious that there is a economic caste system in the domed city or as to who got onto that space ship or life boat.


Sadly, the vast majority of the dummies who support climate denial don't realize that the bouncer won't have their name on the list.
Click to expand...

Life is not the movies. The movies are fiction.

I do not deny climate. There are many climates on Earth. There is no global climate. There is no 'bouncer'. Don't panic.
 
Stretch said:
You poor thing. There will be cataclysmic heat on this earth one day where the entire planet will be incinerated while you sit in a room
fiddling with your thermostat as you and whoever is left here turn to ashes where you stand. And THAT will be the only change in
the climate this old world will ever see.
Peace. Out. :cool:
Click to expand...

You can always tell a dumbass post on this board when Billy bath-tub thanks some twat for it.

Sol won't nova for a few billion years yet- and there won't be any ' thermostats ' when it does. In fact, we'll be lucky to have any vestige of civilisation left in fifty years if Denier Choir morons like you and maggot keep singing.
 
Into the Night said:
Life is not the movies. The movies are fiction.

I do not deny climate. There are many climates on Earth. There is no global climate.
Click to expand...

Paleoclimatology is the study of global climate over geological time. Of course there is a global climate. Half-wits like you are incapable of adjusting for scale.
 
Taichiliberal said:
When I was a kid, I loved all those "post-apocalyptic" sci-fi movies where the survivors struggled against mutants, monsters, a ravaged environment, or to reach another planet as problems beset their space ship/station.

As I got older, I realized that if such a thing were to happen, I wouldn't be one of those survivors. And more recent sci-fi movies reflect my sentiments, were it's painfully obvious that there is a economic caste system in the domed city or as to who got onto that space ship or life boat.


Sadly, the vast majority of the dummies who support climate denial don't realize that the bouncer won't have their name on the list.
Click to expand...

Sadly, there are still a lot of idiots like you that think there is a bouncer and a list when it comes to the bullshit you're peddling.
 
moon said:
You can always tell a dumbass post on this board when Billy bath-tub thanks some twat for it.

Sol won't nova for a few billion years yet- and there won't be any ' thermostats ' when it does. In fact, we'll be lucky to have any vestige of civilisation left in fifty years if Denier Choir morons like you and maggot keep singing.
Click to expand...

So your Holy Entrails predict 50 years, eh?
 
moon said:
Paleoclimatology is the study of global climate over geological time. Of course there is a global climate. Half-wits like you are incapable of adjusting for scale.
Click to expand...

There is no such thing as a global climate. There is no such thing as a global weather.
 
CFM said:
Not when those prevailing conditions have continued over a long period of time.
Click to expand...

And how long is a 'long period'? Seconds? Hours? Months? Years? Centuries? Millennia?

The problem with the definition of 'climate' is that it's subjective. It is not quantitative. Science uses direct quantitative measurements, when it uses any kind of observation at all.

Observation itself is not part of science. Science is simply a set of falsifiable theories. All observations are subject to the problems of phenomenology. They are part of no theory of science. They are evidence only. Science does not use supporting evidence. Evidence may inspire a theory, however.
 
Into the Night said:
And how long is a 'long period'? Seconds? Hours? Months? Years? Centuries? Millennia?

The problem with the definition of 'climate' is that it's subjective. It is not quantitative. Science uses direct quantitative measurements, when it uses any kind of observation at all.

Observation itself is not part of science. Science is simply a set of falsifiable theories. All observations are subject to the problems of phenomenology. They are part of no theory of science. They are evidence only. Science does not use supporting evidence. Evidence may inspire a theory, however.
Click to expand...

Long enough to differentiate between weather and climate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top