"Did you actually totally exonerate the President? No."

Your response here is a goalpost shift.

You've given up on defending Trump in good faith because you know he's guilty of this shit.

You tried the tactic of just pretending you never read or heard what happened, and when that tactic failed, you tried a different one where you just called video tape and actual quotes "lies."

Now, you are at this point...where you are basically daring action. But if your bluff is called, what is your next move? Mass shooting.


Trump is 100% innocent.

Want to know how I know?

No charges filed by Muller

No impeachment
 
Why wasn't Trump charged?

What reason did Mueller give?

Doesn't matter. Unless a person is charged with something, he can never be exonerated. Trump has not been charged with anything, so he cannot possibly be exonerated. The notion that Trump could either be exonerated or not is preposterous, since he has never been charged with anything. The MSM has charged him with plenty, but those charges do not mean anything at this time. Perhaps if lefties are able to crash the gates and win 2020, guilty until proven innocent may be the way of the future. Right now however, Americans are still innocent until proven guilty.
 
Doesn't matter. Unless a person is charged with something, he can never be exonerated. Trump has not been charged with anything, so he cannot possibly be exonerated. The notion that Trump could either be exonerated or not is preposterous, since he has never been charged with anything. The MSM has charged him with plenty, but those charges do not mean anything at this time. Perhaps if lefties are able to crash the gates and win 2020, guilty until proven innocent may be the way of the future. Right now however, Americans are still innocent until proven guilty.

Ignorant liar
 
If lefties are somehow able to hijack the 2020 election, it will be the end of the "innocent until proven guilty" era. Political opponents of the left will become guilty until proven innocent if lefties are ever able to hijack the controls of the ship.
 
If lefties are somehow able to hijack the 2020 election, it will be the end of the "innocent until proven guilty" era. Political opponents of the left will become guilty until proven innocent if lefties are ever able to hijack the controls of the ship.

:lolup:

:rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2:
 
Fortunately, no lefty can lay out what the plan is to win 2020. No lefty knows what agenda they are running on, and no lefty stands behind any lefty candidate. Obviously, lefties have no plan at this time, other than orange man is bad. Lefties are powerless at this time, hopefully it will stay this way through the election.
 
Can't defend the content of what was revealed yesterday, so instead you're daring us to act.

Let's say we do impeach him, how is he going to defend himself...how are Conservatives going to defend him, given Mueller said he didn't indict because of OLC guidelines?


Nope saying you can't act because you will end up looking like bigger asses than you already have. The OLC had no bearing Mueller clarified that! Keep grasping at straws as Trumps numbers go up please, impeach, please.
 
“The Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) has issued an opinion finding that “the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions” in violation of “the constitutional separation of powers.” Given the role of the Special Counsel as an attorney in the Department of Justice and the framework of the Special Counsel regulations, see 28 U.S.C. § 515; 28 C.F.R. § 600.7(a), this Office accepted OLC’s legal conclusion for the purpose of exercising prosecutorial jurisdiction.

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

So what Mueller said charges were not brought based on his team did not reach a conclusion on whether Trump committed a crime, rather than because Justice Department policy stipulates that a sitting president cannot be indicted.
his words not mine you imbecile go collect your unemployment check sit down and STFU like Michael Moore commanded you to
 
Trump is 100% innocent.
Want to know how I know?
No charges filed by Muller
No impeachment

Well, Mueller said he couldn't charge the President because of OLC, but that once Trump is no longer President, he can be charged.

SCHIFF: “Trump & his campaign welcomed & encouraged Russian interference?”
MUELLER: “Yes.”
SCHIFF: “And then Trump & his campaign lied about it to cover it up?”
MUELLER: “Yes.”

Sounds like guilt to me.
 
Nope saying you can't act because you will end up looking like bigger asses than you already have.

Why would that be, given Mueller's answers here?

SCHIFF: “Trump & his campaign welcomed & encouraged Russian interference?”
MUELLER: “Yes.”
SCHIFF: “And then Trump & his campaign lied about it to cover it up?”
MUELLER: “Yes.”
 
The OLC had no bearing Mueller clarified that!

Did you play the video? That's the exact opposite of what he said.

BUCK: Was there sufficient evidence to convict president of Trump or anyone else of obstruction of justice?
MUELLER: We did not make that calculation.
BUCK: Why not?
MUELLER: Because of the OLC opinion that states the president can't be charged with a crime.

So why are you lying, and why are you making your lies so obvious?
 
Former special counsel Robert Mueller said he needed to revise his testimony before Congress on July 24, asserting some earlier statements had been misleading.

Reappearing on Capitol Hill after a lunch break, Mueller told the House Judiciary Committee: “Before we go to questions, I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning.”

“I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by [Rep. Ted] Lieu, who said, and I quote, ‘you didn’t charge the president because of the OLC [Office of Legal Counsel] opinion.’ That is not the correct way to say it,” Mueller added.

“As we say in the report and as I said in the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.”
https://news.ntd.com/mueller-correc...rump-wasnt-charged-with-obstruction_361180.ht

He corrected his statement after he was reminded, three (3) times of his statement to Barr.
 
Keep grasping at straws as Trumps numbers go up please, impeach, please.

His numbers aren't going up. That's fake news.

BUCK: Was there sufficient evidence to convict president of Trump or anyone else of obstruction of justice?
MUELLER: We did not make that calculation.
BUCK: Why not?
MUELLER: Because of the OLC opinion that states the president can't be charged with a crime.

What does that above exchange mean?
 
Not surprised you couldn't figure that one out!

There's literally video of Mueller saying the reason he didn't charge Trump was because of the OLC and DOJ.

It's literally in the video you quoted in your response.

Here's the transcript that you can't seem to account for:

BUCK: Was there sufficient evidence to convict president of Drumpf or anyone else of obstruction of justice?
MUELLER: We did not make that calculation.
BUCK: Why not?
MUELLER: Because of the OLC opinion that states the president can't be charged with a crime.
 
Back
Top