"Did you actually totally exonerate the President? No."

Southern Chicken said:
This idiot:

Should the Special Counsel conclude that the extraordinary circumstances of any particular decision would render compliance with required review and approval procedures by the designated Departmental component inappropriate, he or she may consult directly with the Attorney General.

What does that mean to you?

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/600.7

Come one Domer explain this... ASk your buddy LV. Nevermind dont ask
Click to expand...

Obviously, idiot, the SP did not conclude that the policies were inappropriate to warrant the consultation. :rofl2:

Dumbfuck
 
Since when is the OLC rule that the President cannot be indicted a "required review or approval process"?
 
LV426 said:
The problem with garbage people is that they're not smart.

So before, you were holding this sentence as "proof" of Trump's innocence because you mistakenly think that the OLC rule against indicting a sitting President is a review or approval procedure. But it's not. So this below, has nothing to do with what we're talking about, and is just a red herring you are desperate to toss up because you cannot defend Trump.



The OLC rule against indicting a sitting President is not a "required review process", nor is it a "required approval process."

It's neither of those things.

Nice try, fraud. FAIL.
Click to expand...

THAT IS A DIRECT QUOTE... Please review the above link again(you know the link provided by domer that you liked)...or be lazy your choice.

Here is a point of view:

https://www.troutman.com/images/con...une%2520From%2520Criminal%2520Prosecution.pdf
 
Last edited:
domer76 said:
The 1973 memo is policy, pal.

More absurd “if/would” bullshit, as well.

Try to stick with reality, idiot. 28 CFR 600.7 says that the SP “shall comply” with DOJ policies.
Click to expand...

The CFR cannot change the Constitution. Neither can Congress. The Supreme Court must comply with Article III of the Constitution of the United States.Nothing else.
 
LV426 said:
You're going with this line?

OK...it's your funeral...


SCHIFF: “Trump & his campaign welcomed & encouraged Russian interference?”
MUELLER: “Yes.”
SCHIFF: “And then Trump & his campaign lied about it to cover it up?”
MUELLER: “Yes.”


According to you, welcoming and encouraging Russian interference and then lying about it, isn't "wrong".

Good to know what your standard now is.
Click to expand...

Schiff is an absolute evil prick, I do not care what he says!
 
Wolverine said:
Schiff is an absolute evil prick, I do not care what he says!
Click to expand...

He isn't the one who said Trump accepted Russian help and then lied about it...Mueller said that.

SCHIFF: “Drumpf & his campaign welcomed & encouraged Russian interference?”
MUELLER: “Yes.”
SCHIFF: “And then Drumpf & his campaign lied about it to cover it up?”
MUELLER: “Yes.”

Schiff merely asked the questions, Mueller is the one who says Trump cheated with the Russians, then tried to lie to cover it up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top