man has to pay 450,000 to sandyhook parent

Alex Jones claims
In September 2014, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who runs the website InfoWars, which had previously claimed that the murders were a "false flag" attack perpetrated by the government, made a new conspiracy claim that "no one died" at Sandy Hook Elementary School because the Uniform Crime Reports showed no murders in Newtown for 2012, and that the victims were "child actors."[26][27] This claim is false and misrepresents the FBI report. In reality, because the Connecticut State Police was the lead investigator after the attack, the Sandy Hook victims were included in Connecticut's statewide records (under "State Police Misc.") rather than under the Newtown statistics.[27][28]
In November 2016, Erica L. Lafferty, daughter of Dawn Lafferty Hochsprung, the school principal who was shot and killed at Sandy Hook School, wrote open letters to then-President-elect Donald Trump (published in Medium and USA Today), calling upon him to denounce Jones,[29] after Trump had appeared on Infowars during his presidential campaign and lavished praise on its presenter, saying that the conspiracy theorist had an "amazing" reputation and pledging not to let him down.[29] On February 20, 2017, the Newtown School Board wrote to President Trump and urged him to recognize the murders of 26 people at Sandy Hook and to "remove your support from anyone who continues to insist that the tragedy was staged or not real."[30][31][32] Trump did not respond to the letter.[30][31]
In March 2018, six families of victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, as well as an FBI agent who responded to the attack, filed a defamation lawsuit against Jones for his role in spreading conspiracy theories about the shooting,[33][34][35][36] and on April 16, 2018, parents of two other victims of the shooting sued Jones for $1 million each.[37]

On February 20, 2017, the Newtown School Board wrote to President Trump and urged him to recognize the murders of 26 people at Sandy Hook and to "remove your support from anyone who continues to insist that the tragedy was staged or not real."[30][31][32] Trump did not respond to the letter.
 
TRUMP WAS ALL IN ON THE LIES


he still has never admitted these children were MURDERED


its the republican party
 
Hello evince,


No, it is not.

The problem is that the internet gives an audience to kooks whom otherwise nobody would listen to. That in no way supports an extrapolation to assume the Republican party is 'Full of' people like this fringe radical extremist.

You've made the mistake of assuming the worst about the Republican party because you believe their most extreme fringe radical voices represent the body of the Republican party. That is not true, and you have no proof that it is. It is an incorrect assumption on your part.
 
I was wondering how the law was broken to justify this judgement. The article explains it. The denier claimed without basis that the parents of Sandy Hook victims falsified the death certificates. He has made a record of publicly claiming (falsely) that the Sandy Hook parents are 'liars,' a defamation of character. It is a false claim, so the parents were harmed and the defendant must then pay them an amount to compensate them for the harm he caused them.
 
Hello evince,



No, it is not.

The problem is that the internet gives an audience to kooks whom otherwise nobody would listen to. That in no way supports an extrapolation to assume the Republican party is 'Full of' people like this fringe radical extremist.

You've made the mistake of assuming the worst about the Republican party because you believe their most extreme fringe radical voices represent the body of the Republican party. That is not true, and you have no proof that it is. It is an incorrect assumption on your part.

he still has the complete devotion of the republican party voters
 
Alex Jones claims
In September 2014, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who runs the website InfoWars, which had previously claimed that the murders were a "false flag" attack perpetrated by the government, made a new conspiracy claim that "no one died" at Sandy Hook Elementary School because the Uniform Crime Reports showed no murders in Newtown for 2012, and that the victims were "child actors."[26][27] This claim is false and misrepresents the FBI report. In reality, because the Connecticut State Police was the lead investigator after the attack, the Sandy Hook victims were included in Connecticut's statewide records (under "State Police Misc.") rather than under the Newtown statistics.[27][28]
In November 2016, Erica L. Lafferty, daughter of Dawn Lafferty Hochsprung, the school principal who was shot and killed at Sandy Hook School, wrote open letters to then-President-elect Donald Trump (published in Medium and USA Today), calling upon him to denounce Jones,[29] after Trump had appeared on Infowars during his presidential campaign and lavished praise on its presenter, saying that the conspiracy theorist had an "amazing" reputation and pledging not to let him down.[29] On February 20, 2017, the Newtown School Board wrote to President Trump and urged him to recognize the murders of 26 people at Sandy Hook and to "remove your support from anyone who continues to insist that the tragedy was staged or not real."[30][31][32] Trump did not respond to the letter.[30][31]
In March 2018, six families of victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, as well as an FBI agent who responded to the attack, filed a defamation lawsuit against Jones for his role in spreading conspiracy theories about the shooting,[33][34][35][36] and on April 16, 2018, parents of two other victims of the shooting sued Jones for $1 million each.[37]

On February 20, 2017, the Newtown School Board wrote to President Trump and urged him to recognize the murders of 26 people at Sandy Hook and to "remove your support from anyone who continues to insist that the tragedy was staged or not real."[30][31][32] Trump did not respond to the letter.



post 55 and 56
 
Hello evince,

he still has the complete devotion of the republican party voters

No, not complete.

Trump actually has several Republicans running against him for the 2020 Republican nomination. I am not trying to say this represents a large proportion of Republican voters, but there are some who are not aligned with the President (Romney, Collins, Murkowski) and that means he does not have the 'complete' support of Republican voters.

Just being realistic.

Realistic is more likely to offer a true assessment of American politics.

Fooling ourselves does not lead to good understanding or decision-making.

If we want to truly understand American politics we have to be vigilant to the pitfalls of falling for spin.

Republicans are very weak about falling for spin. Let's make sure we don't.

Let us stay strong and devoted to truth, justice and the American way.
 
Hello evince,



No, not complete.

Trump actually has several Republicans running against him for the 2020 Republican nomination. I am not trying to say this represents a large proportion of Republican voters, but there are some who are not aligned with the President (Romney, Collins, Murkowski) and that means he does not have the 'complete' support of Republican voters.

Just being realistic.

Realistic is more likely to offer a true assessment of American politics.

Fooling ourselves does not lead to good understanding or decision-making.

If we want to truly understand American politics we have to be vigilant to the pitfalls of falling for spin.

Republicans are very weak about falling for spin. Let's make sure we don't.

Let us stay strong and devoted to truth, justice and the American way.

Actually there are not several Reds running. Some are discussing it. The Repubs do not permit outliers. I do not think Sanford and the others will be allowed to actually run. There will be no debates.
There are many people testifying against Trump in the impeachment investigation. That does not say a thing about the party at large. They are sitting on the "candidates".
 
No, you get pissed when your brain dead stupidity gets shoved back into your low IQ mug. You can scream and flail all you want dumb fuck; but we still do not live in the lawless, Fascistic Third world shit hole you morons on the left would like to turn us into.

The guy has a right to be a moron. The CONSTITUTION; read it asshat. :rolleyes:

Evince hates the US Constitution, she loves the Russian version.
 
the courts found that his son existed and was murdered by some republican gun nutters brain broken child


and that the republican assholes TORTURED the MURDERED CHILDS family


but you think it was great republican tactics

You're fucking sick. Get help.
 
Fetzer is nuttier than a fruitcake. Here's part of his bio. He's also a Holocaust denier, a real piece of work.

James Henry Fetzer (born December 6, 1940) is an emeritus professor of the philosophy of science at the University of Minnesota Duluth and a conspiracy theorist...

In the early 1990s, Fetzer began to promote John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories, later 9/11 conspiracy theories, Holocaust denial, conspiracy theories regarding the 2002 death of Senator Paul Wellstone and Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theories since the multiple fatalities in 2012.


Fetzer conspiracy theories here.

So? Sounds like a very intelligent man who thinks for himself. Only morons like you get their news from the gover-media complex.
 
Hello Gonzomin,

Actually there are not several Reds running. Some are discussing it.

Sanford, Weld and Walsh are RUNNING. It is far beyond the discussion stage.

Ballotopedia

Sanford for PRESIDENT website


Walsh for PRESIDENT website


Weld for PRESIDENT website


The Repubs do not permit outliers.

The Republicans tried to not permit Trump. We se how far that got them.

I do not think Sanford and the others will be allowed to actually run. There will be no debates.

They are already running. There has already been a Republican debate.

" With the blockbuster news that House Democrats were moving forward with an impeachment inquiry as the backdrop, two long-shot GOP primary candidates squared off in a debate Tuesday night that mostly saw the pair take turns walloping an opponent not in the room: President Donald Trump.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Bill Weld and former Illinois Rep. Joe Walsh took part in Tuesday's unsanctioned GOP primary debate, which not only didn’t feature the president, but didn't even have the third candidate running in the primary, Mark Sanford, who sat out the festivities to campaign in Iowa.

The event, hosted by Business Insider, took place Tuesday night in New York City.

While Trump may not have been in the room, he still dominated the night, as Walsh and Weld spent the majority of their time on stage peppering the president over issues ranging from impeachment, to tweets, to immigration. At one point the former congressman bluntly pivoted away from talking policy to declare: “It's not about the issues, it's about Trump.”

“I'm not debating Bill Weld,” Walsh said. “The problem is an unfit president in the White House who took a divided country and is it is dividing that.”

It also didn’t take long for both candidates to throw their support behind the newly announced impeachment inquiry."

The first Republican debate was overshadowed by the impeachment news


There are many people testifying against Trump in the impeachment investigation. That does not say a thing about the party at large. They are sitting on the "candidates".

I must respectfully disagree in light of the above.
 
So? Sounds like a very intelligent man who thinks for himself. Only morons like you get their news from the gover-media complex.

"Thinks for himself", that's just a polite way of saying what I said, he's nuttier than a fruitcake.

I do like reading conspiracy theories, though. It's amazing (and disturbing) what a mind will come up with to justify its crazy thinking.
 
Back
Top