Watergate style hearings, coming soon to a television near you.

Jarod

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Watergate style hearings, coming soon to a television near you.



Trumps getting what you asked for, he’s going to regret it.
 
Jarod said:
Watergate style hearings, coming soon to a television near you.



Trumps getting what you asked for, he’s going to regret it.
Click to expand...

Finally, the whining Trump lackeys are going to get what they asked for.
 
Jarod said:
Watergate style hearings, coming soon to a television near you.



Trumps getting what you asked for, he’s going to regret it.
Click to expand...



Yeah. MADEUP BULLSHIT from the SCHIFF CHARADE will be more convincing than the WORDS OF THE URKAINE PRESIDENT HIMSELF... :laugh:
 
bullshit on steroids,,Watergate was a fair process from beginning to end,, This is a Star Chamber.
and the Thurs vote isn't even a vote on impeachment,, It;s a pig circus
 
This is the right thing to do for the institution and the American people,” said McGovern.

Pelosi stated in a letter Monday that the resolution was not legally necessary but the House decided to take the vote “to eliminate any doubt as to whether the Trump administration may withhold documents, prevent witness testimony, disregard duly authorized subpoenas, or continue obstructing the House of Representatives.”
Click to expand...
partisan noise -nothing more
 
Watergate had the break-in crime.
Bubba had the lies crime.
Dancy has squat.
No impeachment......they're still fishing for a "crime" here in the Mariana Trench and they're lost with no
air in their tanks.
 
Jarod said:
You think she needs an “impeachment resolution” to set up these hearings? Hahaha! You keep falling for these dumb as dirt talking points.
Click to expand...

you said last week she doesn't even need the vote she says she is going to take

now she is taking a vote that isn't really a vote that you say she doesn't need

yup, makes perfect sense
 
Jarod said:
Watergate style hearings, coming soon to a television near you.
Click to expand...
I'm looking forward to seeing what the crime was.
After none is found I'm looking more forward to a senate trial so repubs can call their own witnesses. Will be like a Perry Mason boomerang .
 
anonymoose said:
I'm looking forward to seeing what the crime was.
After none is found I'm looking more forward to a senate trial so repubs can call their own witnesses. Will be like a Perry Mason boomerang .
Click to expand...

Time will tell. Impeachment does not have to be based on a crime, read the Federalist papers.

The phrase high crimes and misdemeanors comes from English parliamentary documents, referring to non codified abuse of power or malfecence.
 
dukkha said:
bullshit on steroids,,Watergate was a fair process from beginning to end,, This is a Star Chamber.
and the Thurs vote isn't even a vote on impeachment,, It;s a pig circus
Click to expand...

You wanted public hearings, now you got them.

Stop whining.
 
Stretch said:
Watergate had the break-in crime.
Bubba had the lies crime.
Dancy has squat.
No impeachment......they're still fishing for a "crime" here in the Mariana Trench and they're lost with no
air in their tanks.
Click to expand...

Sondland told lawmakers that what Trump did amounted to a quid pro quo.
U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland told House committees last week that the way in which President Donald Drumpf and his allies pressured Ukraine to open political investigations in exchange for a White House meeting amounted to a quid pro quo. Sondland’s lawyer told the Wall Street Journal that the top diplomat specifically said that Ukraine agreeing to open up an investigation into 2016 election interference and a probe into a gas company where former vice president Joe Biden’s son once served on the board was a condition for a White House meeting between Drumpf and his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky. A lawmaker asked Sondland specifically whether that amounted to a quid pro quo. The diplomat specified that he wasn’t a lawyer but he believed the answer to that question was yes.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics...e-committees-trumps-ukraine-quid-pro-quo.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top