We need a President who isn't a laughing stock

Hello Penderyn,

Penderyn said:
It's interesting that the trumpers can never do anything but make threatening noises about how they're going to call out the bogey-men who can't read from the backwoods to bully all the educated swine who laugh at their pet monster. Even scumbags like Johnson are desperate to pretend they never even met the senile clown, and all sensible people laugh at the fool not to despair. God help America!
Click to expand...

Wonderfully put!

Marvelous use of the language.

They don't call it English because it came from America...
 
Penderyn said:
Chamberlain thought he was avoiding a war, but at least changed his mind later. The real question is whether the Fatman has a mind left to change.
Click to expand...

Chamberlain allowed the UK time to build up its fighter force, without it we'd have been fucked. He deserves praise for that not vilification by stupid Septics.
 
Penderyn said:
Chamberlain thought he was avoiding a war, but at least changed his mind later. The real question is whether the Fatman has a mind left to change.
Click to expand...

No he didnt, he knew damn well that there would likely be a war and bought time for the RAF to build up its defences. It was Michael Foot in the book Guilty Men and Churchill in his memoirs that thrashed Chamberlain's reputation. Fortunately a reappraisal, which has been well overdue, has redressed the balance to some extent.
 
Last edited:
Nothing says the President is more full of it than being trashed by his own tweets.

Obama-era Trump could have a really good argument with Trump-era Trump.

And he would lose either way!
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Celticguy,



As if the USA is not already dominant.

We already tower over the rest of the world. Is it really necessary to crush them and rub it in like we are some kind of immature bully?
Click to expand...

You mean should we not remind them of their obligations to a mutually beneficial pact to which they agreed ?
Ciddling deadbeats serves no purpose.
 
Eagle-Eye said:
Could the UK and Russia have defeated Germany and Italy without US forces and lend lease? You seem to forget we were fighting two wars at the same time. Also Russia had American weapons when they pushed the Germans off Soviet soil.
Click to expand...

Yes, certainly, though it would have taken longer. If you haven't got the guts to fight Hitler till he's beat, selling weapons is a profitable game.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top